Spiked-online and the Hubbert
curve
Posted to www.marxmail.org on
Last November, Paul Flewers had
the following to say about spiked-online.
"Re Spiked and their new pals Hill
and Knowlton. As a former supporter of the Revolutionary Communist
Party, I'm hardly surprised at this. They'll go with anybody, so it seems,
these days. The question is: Who's listening to them? An interesting exercise
to while away idle hours is to take some names from the Spiked
web-site, do a Google search, and find for what
corporations and think-tanks they've been working. We're talking about Big Oil
here, that sort of thing."
I should explain the reference to Hill and Knowlton. This is
a PR firm that was responsible for creating the campaign that led to Gulf War
1. Remember the business about Iraqi soldiers plucking Kuwaiti babies from
their incubators and dumping them on the cold floor to die? That lie was cooked
up by Hill and Knowlton. If you go to www.spiked-online.com and clink
"events", you'll discover no less than 3 soirees co-sponsored by Hill
and Knowlton.
Although there are fewer and fewer radicals who have
connections with this crew, they do seem to maintain some credibility--largely
through the efforts of James Heartfield, an erstwhile
ubiquitous figure on the Internet who still writes Marxish
sounding tracts. For example, a young Barnard professor named Bashir Abu-Manneh has a polemic
against Hardt and Negri in
the latest MR that finds these words by Heartfield
worth quoting: “The real meaning of the ‘new social movements’ is a move away
from the idea of an agent of social transformation altogether. The novel forms
of organization are a break with the idea of collective agency.”
Unfortunately, Abu-Manneh, with
whom I had a discussion with on this citation, seems unaware that in the world
of James Heartfield "social transformation"
entails the liberal use of DDT, a right to smoke cigarettes in restaurants,
etc. There was some progress, however. In the original version of the article,
there were also favorable references to Frank Furedi,
Hardt's guru, that are now nowhere to be found. I
imagine that after I pointed these words written by Furedi
in a
All this is background, especially Paul Flewer's
discovery of spiked-online connections to big oil companies, to an article that
appears on spiked-online today:
Inflaming the oil
crisis by Joe Kaplinsky
Are we running out of
oil? Terrorism in
Worries about supplies
have been slowly building for some time; recent events have brought them to a
head. But to the extent that real problems exist, they are less the result of
oil scarcity or instability in the
In the
Fears about running
out of oil have become widespread in
Like earlier concerns
about oil depletion, the current panic has little basis in the geology of oil.
The argument that we are about to run out of oil has been around for as long as
oil has been produced. But the depletion argument becomes popular at different
times for different reasons. The last time oil depletion became a major concern
was during the OPEC boycott of 1973/4, and carried on through the recession of
the early 1980s. From the mid-1980s, concerns about global warming took over -
and instead of worrying that we had too little oil many fretted that we had too
much. Burning all that oil would disrupt the climate, they argued, by adding
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Today we have a
synthesis of these two arguments. We apparently have both too little oil and
too much. The most pessimistic forecasters argue that, not only is industrial civilisation about to collapse as it runs out of oil, but
it will be tipped over the edge by global warming as a consequence of past
energy use.
Full: http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/0000000CA562.htm
Leave it to spiked-online to not only downplay the urgency
of oil depletion, but to defend global warming skepticism all in the same
breath. Somebody, I can't remember whom, tried to link the Hubbert
curve with some kind of oil company conspiracy to drive up the price of oil.
The spiked-online article, in my opinion, is much more in line with the
industry's thinking.