|
GUEST ESSAY
TALKING ABOUT YOUR GENERATION
A Virtual Model
Professor Paige West
he tall blond man from
Nebraska wears the clip-on microphone like a professional. He towers
above us, the participants in his seminar on marketing at the
Specialty Coffee Association of America’s annual meeting, and
smiles a radiant white row of perfect teeth. He breaks the ice by
revving up the caffeinated crowd when he says, “OK. OK. We are
here to sell coffee! YEAH.” People in the audience cheer
enthusiastically.
We are all here in this
conference room in our attempt to understand why people buy flavored
coffees, “single-origin” coffees like those from Papua
New Guinea, Organic, Fair Trade, and the other seemingly socially
responsible coffees. Our first task is to break into groups and come
up with a list of the “essential qualities” of our
“generation.” I am placed into the Generation X group
because I was born between 1964 and 1982, but as a group, we don’t
seem to have much in common. We try to make a list of essentialisms
but don’t agree on any of them.
Mr. Nebraska (MN): “OK,
so you Silent Generation folks, give us your qualities.”
“We built and
defended this country,” says one man wearing a hat with a
battleship’s name on it.
MN: “OK, now for
the Baby Boomers, what do you have to contribute as a generation?”
“We are free
thinkers!” shout several people at the same time.
MN: “What about
the Xers?”
Several people from my
seemingly stoic group now perk up and yell, “We are
individuals,” “We question authority,” and, “We
are fast technology!”
MN: “Now, what
about you Millennials? Hello, Millennials? Where are my Millennials?”
Two young guys, who
seem out of place in this older, business-suited crowd, shyly raise
their hands. One of them says, "We are much faster technology.”
Everyone laughs. Then
Mr. Nebraska begins his lecture.
For the next hour, he
talks about American generations and how they hold the key to
marketing. He begins with his analysis of the essential
characteristics of each generation. “The Silent Generation”
are a hardworking-loyal-sacrificing-dedicated-conformist-never
questioning-authority-delayed-gratification-duty-before-pleasure
group. Mr. Nebraska smiles broadly when he talks about these people,
calling them “folks” and mentioning his grandparents. But
then he tells us that they don’t have any purchasing power in
the retail world, so they are a waste of time for the seminar.
He then moves on to the
Baby Boomers. They can be summed up as essentially full of
“optimism,” “team-oriented,” dedicated both
to “personal growth” and “personal gratification.”
They work long hours but have a “youthful mindset” which
they maintain with “health and fitness.” Baby Boomer DNA
is apparently encoded with the deep and abiding desire for iconic
logos that symbolize gratification, indulgence, and defying age.
Their DNA forces them to desire lots of choices among products, quick
and thoughtful professional services, and upscale,
consumer-comes-first-type retail culture.
It turns out that my
generation is “liquid”: we have “liquid value”
and a “liquid mindset.” We can “adjust to
anything,” because we are
independent-individualist-selfish-latchkey kids who rely on
experience and have “no loyalty to anyone or anything.”
My Generation X DNA makes me skeptical of logos, desirous of multiple
similar products with a unique story behind each of them, wanting
service that is “authentic,” during which I can “make
a connection” and “share a story.” Culturally, I
desire casual, flexible, liquid space where I can read the paper,
check my e-mail, and chat with friends.
Finally, he moves on to
the people born between 1983 and 2000, the Millennials. For Mr.
Nebraska, Millennials want “achievement” but are “not
driven.” They value “globalism” but are “community
focused” and think that through introspection, they can change
the world. Millennials are “encoded” with the desire for
brands and logos. They value the “symbols of products”
more than anything else. They want “global products” that
are “political” and “environmentally friendly,”
things that allow them to express their “self-knowledge.”
They want to be “made to feel important.” And culturally,
they want, and can find, “a meaning-filled experience”
during “retail time.”
When he is finished
with his description of the Millennials, he looks at us thoughtfully,
pauses, and says, “This, this, is at the very core of
people. It is who they are.” Later, he says, “The logo,
product, service and atmosphere, or culture of a business”
is the key to making your “generational pitch.” And he
cautions the audience, “You want to listen to this, the
cultures I’m talking about. They are in people’s DNA.”
Recently,
anthropologists James Carrier and Daniel Miller, building upon the
idea that economic activities have become increasingly removed from
social relationships, developed a set of theories called
“virtualism,” defined as the
attempt to make the actual world conform to an abstract model of it.
They use the concept to criticize economic policies where there is a
tendency to abstract human decision making from its social context,
and build models of the world and its workings that cannot take the
full range or complexity of people’s daily lives into account.
But these abstractions become virtualism when the real world is
expected to transform itself in accordance with the models.
Miller argues that we
can see this virtualism at work in the production of the contemporary
consumer in economic discourses. He sees the creation of a “virtual
consumer” who desires and buys certain things according to
models of consumer behavior based on figures used in economic
modeling. Mr. Nebraska and the organization for which he works deploy
their generation-based models at trade conferences for everything
from coffee, to sporting goods equipment, to pens. People like the
coffee shop owners, small coffee roasters, and others at these
conferences alter their business plans, selling strategies, and
physical retail spaces to reflect the desires of virtual consumers.
Virtual consumers are assumed to be white upper- and middle-class
people in the formulation offered by Mr. Nebraska. In turn, we
consumers, in all of our diversity, come to want the things they
offer us, because we get used to them, and later, we come to expect
them. Eventually, because the physical world has come to look like
the virtual world, the consumer’s actual behavior comes to
mirror the virtual behavior, and the virtual consumers become real.

|