Minutes
President
Bollinger convened the meeting of the Faculty of the Arts and Sciences at
1.
President Bollinger began by calling attention to his recent email
announcing that the search for the new Vice President for Arts and Sciences had
been launched. Professor David Freedberg
is chairing the search committee, and President Bollinger expressed his deep
appreciation for the committee’s efforts in this endeavor. He went on to discuss the search for the new
Provost. He reported that he has been
talking to many people around
He then indicated that he is
continuing his efforts to learn about the institution. He cited space as an area to which he is
devoting a good deal of attention. He
observed that space will be critical if the institution is to move forward in
any meaningful programmatic way. He also
stated that he was aware of the needs within the Arts and Sciences for an
increase in faculty size, and that he expects to announce a plan within the
next month or so regarding that need.
He expressed his deep appreciation
to everyone who has been involved with the
He then went on to talk
about the budget. He noted that
President Bollinger reported
that he intends to invest considerable effort during spring semester to engaging
alums. He said that he views the 250th
anniversary of the university as an important fundraising opportunity.
With respect to the case
related to affirmative action scheduled for presentation to the Supreme Court,
he reported that they are in the final stages of preparation. It is expected that the Supreme Court will
make its decision by the end of the year.
If the decision is negative, it will have a significant impact on
2.
It was moved, seconded, and approved by majority vote that the minutes
of the meeting on
3.
Vice President Cohen opened the discussion on the proposal to establish
renewable term appointments for lecturers in the Arts and Sciences by providing
some context for the proposal. He
indicated that, currently, associates and lecturers with unmodified titles are
unable to hold their appointments beyond the seventh year. A survey was done of peer institutions and it
was found that
Vice President Cohen went on
to call attention to several other aspects of the proposal, noting in
particular the rigorous review process that would be implemented for these
appointments and that the number of lecturers in these appointments may not
exceed 6% of the total professorial rank faculty in the Arts and Sciences. The proposal currently excludes the Departments
of the Arts and International and Public Affairs but had not excluded the
Professor Helfand rose to
oppose the proposal. His reasons for
doing so included the fact that no courses had been excluded from the array of
courses that a lecturer could teach.
Further, he stated his belief that the producers of knowledge should be
the conveyors of knowledge. Professor
Jervis added his voice to the concern about what is and is not appropriate for
full-time lecturers to teach.
In response to a question
about numbers, Vice President Cohen cited the governors that would limit
proliferation of such appointments:
a) It is unlikely that many departments
will come forward with requests for such appointments as they would replace
professorial rank faculty. b) Lecturer
positions would be rationed by their having to be approved by the vice
president and deans in the course of the annual review process for
Instructional Budget Statements. Vice
President Cohen then spoke to the issue of the appropriateness of what lecturers
can teach. He stated that he himself
believes that the faculty have to have confidence in the reasonableness of
departments with respect to decisions about content. Professor Breslow rose to describe the
situation in the Chemistry department as an argument for why decisions on
lecturers’ and associates’ teaching assignments need to be departmentally
based.
Professor Kelley rose to
speak in support of the proposal. She
noted that the primary argument for it is that it benefits the students. Not only does it ensure strong teaching in
areas not necessarily represented elsewhere in the departmental faculty, but it
will also ensure greater continuity among personnel. It is her experience that lecturers do their
job very well and that, if the faculty is to take pedagogy seriously, it has to
make provision for career paths that recognize pedagogues in a serious
way. Professor O’Halloran supported Vice
President Cohen’s earlier statements about the importance of taking the review
process most seriously. Professor Friedman,
noting that the proposal prohibits the movement of professorial rank faculty
into the lecturer ranks, asked whether Directors of Instruction might move into
this track. His question was responded
to in the affirmative. Professor Jervis
reiterated the hope that, as the structures were put in place for this career
track, more elaborated guidelines regarding what lecturers could and could not
do would be developed. Professor
Weinberg observed that the real concern might more appropriately be phrased as
what regular professorial rank faculty would no longer be doing, and Professor
Foner asked for clarification on what would keep a future vice president from
forcing a department to take a lecturer rather than an assistant professor that
it might have requested. Vice President
Cohen responded that he found that scenario unlikely.
Following discussion, Vice
President Cohen summarized the sense of the faculty. He noted the general endorsement of the
proposal but acknowledged the clear call for a) the Faculty Development
Committee to devote time to thinking in some detail about implementation of the
review structures and, b) the Vice President and deans to think carefully when they
reviewed the first cycle of such positions.
4.
Dean Henry Pinkham presented the update on the Graduate School of Arts
and Sciences. He called the faculty’s
attention to the annual report on the ECFAS website. He began his report by noting that the
--The school
has achieved its goal of full funding for 90% of the incoming students. It seeks now to move to 100%. In response to a question from the floor, he
clarified the policy on unfunded students.
Departments no longer have quotas of unfunded students that they must
admit. Departments must be prepared to
allocate fellowship support to any unfunded student it admits beginning in year
two of the student’s tenure at
--The Arts and
Sciences will need to find ways to replace the instructional needs that are
emerging as a result of downsizing of the
--Greater
attention needs to be given to the professional training component of the
Ph.D. This includes preparation for
non-academic roles and training for teaching.
Improving the training for teaching is the rationale for seeking to develop
a teaching center.
--Space
represents an acute situation for graduate students, many humanities and social
sciences departments have no space for their graduate students, including no
space for them to meet with students in the classes for which they serve as
teaching fellows. Ideally, it would be
important to create a communal space, such as a
Responding to
the statements about the need for improved training for teaching, Professor
Breslow described the efforts in the Department of Chemistry to train teaching
fellows.
Professor
Shapiro asked about the status of unionization.
Dean Pinkham indicated that they were waiting for a decision from the
National Labor Relations Board. Provost
Cole gave an overview of a number of cases currently on the NLRB agenda.
At that point,
the focus of the discussion shifted and a question was asked regarding plans
for any further increases in the size of the undergraduate student body. Provost Cole reported that
5.
Professor Andy Nathan, chair of the Executive Committee of the Faculty
of Arts and Sciences, began his report by introducing the members of ECFAS
present at the meeting. He then described
the consultative process in which the committee has been engaged. He noted that everyone with whom the
committee has talked had been generous with both their time and the quality of
the information they provided. Professor
Nathan reported that the Executive Committee was reassured by the state of the
Arts and Sciences. He highlighted the
interrelated nature of the enterprise and acknowledged some of its
challenges.
He next gave an
overview of the key sections of the Executive Committee’s letter included in
the call for the meeting. He called
attention to the goals for administration and faculty governance (noting that faculty
want to have a central role in the priority setting process in the current
budgetary environment) and the summary of their work to date. He then invited faculty discussion of the
questions at the bottom of pages 6 and 7 in their letter and encouraged faculty
to ask any additional questions they might have.
Professor
Sisman reiterated the importance of thinking about issues related to
faculty. Vice President Cohen described
three aspects to be considered about instructional support – securing eminence,
increasing the size of the faculty, and improving the salaries of continuing
faculty. He noted that it will be
important to have a sense of the faculty regarding the balance among these
three competing demands. Professor
Jervis asked how any increase in faculty size might be funded given the
flatness of the income stream.
6.
Professor Helfand presented the report of the Committee on Arts and
Sciences Fundraising. He began by
reminding the faculty that the Arts and Sciences is dependent upon tuition for
85% of its revenues. He then returned
the theme of the capital campaign which was to raise 50 substitutional chairs
for the Arts and Sciences. A total of 42
have been raised; however, their December 2002 market value was only $47
million rather than the $75 million that had been envisioned. Professor Helfand observed that if the rest
of the chairs and the outstanding pledges were to be realized, the endowment
level would increase from $47 million to $58 million.
He reported
that the Committee on Arts and Sciences Fundraising had had several meetings
with representatives from UDAR. He cited
the openness of UDAR in discussing its current status and in describing the
future of fundraising at
Vice President
Susan Feagin was called upon to provide an overview of current planning and
activities in UDAR. These include:
--building on
the foundation of the capital campaign
--restructuring
UDAR with respect to both organization and culture
--more actively
involving faculty in fundraising going forward
--involving
trustees in fundraising
--shifting to a
culture of greater accountability
She closed by emphasizing
the fundamental operating principle that fundraisers do not set priorities and expressing
appreciation to Vice President Cohen and the deans who had reached out to her
and her staff in the spirit of welcome and collaboration since her arrival.
There being no
further business to come before the body, the meeting was by consensus
adjourned at
Prepared
by
Roxie R. Smith
Associate Vice President