The freedom traditionally accorded to members of the faculty
to decide for themselves in large measure what they teach and how imposes a
correlative obligation of responsible self-discipline. Every effort must
therefore be made to be accurate, to be objective, to demonstrate appropriate
restraint, and to show respect for the opinions of others. Faculty members may
not enroll or refuse to enroll students on the basis of those students' beliefs,
or otherwise discriminate arbitrarily or capriciously among them. Evaluation of
students and awards of grade and credit must be based on academic performance
professionally judged, not on matters extraneous to that performance; grades and
other evaluations shall be provided to the University promptly as required for
each student, for each class. Faculty members shall meet their classes as
announced and shall also make themselves regularly available to their students
outside the classroom. When it is impossible to meet a class, alternative
instruction shall be offered, and adequate notice given, such as to satisfy the
students' expectations and the faculty member's contract with the University;
this obligation can be met in various ways, and the method adopted should be
endorsed by the department chairman or the dean. Exploitation of students or of
junior colleagues for private advantage is to be avoided, and all significant
assistance must be publicly acknowledged. Faculty members must respond
conscientiously to requests from students or former students for references; the
confidential nature of teacher-student relationships is to be respected.
All members of the faculty share responsibility for the governance of the University and for the preservation of an atmosphere of scholarship and rational discourse. Faculty members may not use their positions to cause interference with personal security, property, or freedom of movement, expression, or assembly on campus. Faculty members should join in the broadest possible search for academic talent, and in the appointment or promotion of the best qualified candidate, making every effort to be objective in their professional judgments of colleagues and potential colleagues. Faculty members must acknowledge indebtedness to other scholars. Senior faculty members should stand ready to counsel their junior colleagues and to give them due credit for any assistance given. When faculty members assume obligations outside the University, they should assess the amount and character of these obligations with due regard to their paramount responsibilities within the University. When a faculty member speaks or acts as a private person outside the University, a special effort must be made to avoid giving the impression that he or she speaks or acts on behalf of the University.
A climate must be maintained at the University where creativity and productivity in research are promoted in an atmosphere of high ethical standards. It is essential that the integrity of research be maintained at all times, since long-standing, often irreversible damage can result from breach of academic commitment to truth in investigative activities. Misconduct in research is herein defined as gross lack of integrity in conducting basic or clinical investigations involving dishonesty, knowing misrepresentation of data, and/or violation of accepted standards. Academic misconduct or fraud can destroy public trust in the academic community as a whole and in our own institution in particular; it can shatter individual careers; it can undermine sensitive relationships between investigators, students, and the public.
In modern collaborative research, the implications of academic misconduct or fraud go far beyond the individual; they also affect collaborators whose own work has been committed to objective search for truth. The specter of guilt by association may lurk in the background for many years to come. Therefore, joint authorship requires joint responsibility; each author claiming credit for the entire work must also be aware of joint discredit. Investigators in collaborative research projects each must make reasonable and periodic inquiry as to the integrity of and processes involved in gathering and evaluating data. It should be understood that overall responsibility for the integrity of collaborative research rests with the principal investigator. Senior investigators cannot be allowed to escape the consequences of the discovery of misconduct or fraud committed under their supervision.
Every member of the faculty has a duty to respond promptly to any well-founded suspicion of academic misconduct or fraud. Allegations must be made with caution; nevertheless, the results of long-standing misconduct or fraud are so devastating that potential irregularities must be brought promptly to the attention of the proper authorities. At the same time, the rights of those whose research procedures or results are in question from the standpoint of possible falsification or adulteration must be carefully protected while a careful and fair investigation is being carried out.
For the guidelines for the review of professional misconduct or fraud in research, please see the complete text of Appendix E of The Faculty Handbook which is available on the web at www.columbia.edu/cu/vpaa/fhb.
Note: These and other passages from the faculty Handbook also inform policy regarding graduate students. Graduate students engaged in teaching and research are at all times expected to uphold the ethical standards that are here applied to the faculty