184
THE ICONOGRAPHY OF MANHATTAN ISLAND
VARIATIONS IN NOMENCLATURE, ETC., ON THE MAPS [■]
GENERAL TITLE
Castello Harrisse
De Manatvs. op de Noort Riuier Manatvs Gelegen op de Noot Riuier
[The Manatus on the North River] [erasure]
[Manatus lying on the North River]
REFERENCES ON MANHATTAN ISLAND
Note that No. 14, on the North R., occurs twice,
vpest of 13 and vpest of 15
No. 18 (south). No. 19 (north). Note, however,
that the descriptions of these farms in the key
are, by transposition, respectively, made to
agree in substance
No. 23 (with house)
No. 42 (no writing)
No. 45 (with house)
The island unnamed
No. 18 (north), No. 19 (south)
Lacking, but called for in the key
Number lacking, but has zeegendal
Number lacking, but has the house
t Eyland Manatus
REFERENCES ELSEWHERE THAN ON MANHATTAN ISLAND
Achter Col
No. 20 (on both Ward's and Randall's Islands)
No. 33 (on Staten Is.)
konyne Eylandt
Wichquawanck
Rooden Hoeck
No. 3 5 (south of Rooden Hoeck)
Dit fatzoen van Huysen Bewoonen de Wilden
Keskachaue
Mareckewich
No. 38 (under 37)
No. 40 (with house)
Hellegat
Erroneously, Achter 't Col
Number lacking on Randall's Island
Number lacking, but mentioned in the key.
Conyne Eylant
Wich Quawanck
Rooden houc
Erroneously written. No. 25 (note that 25 is also
on Manhattan in both maps)
Dit fatcoen Huysen Bewoonen wilden Keskachaue
Marec [space] kewich
Erroneously written. No. 36 (see the real 36 in
dotted heart line, to the south-east)
Number lacking, but called for in the key
Helle Gadt
VARIATIONS IN NOMENCLATURE, ETC., IN THE KEYS[-
BOUWERIES AND PLANTATIONS [^]
Harrisse
Aenwysing der voornaemste Plaetsen op de
Manatvs.
[Indication of the principal places on the Ma¬
natus.]
N". I Comp Bouwery met Een Treffelleyck Huys
Castello
Aenwysing der Plaetsen op en om Manatus.
[Indication of the places on and in the neighbour¬
hood of Manatus.]
I: Comp. Bouerij met een trelFelyck Huys
[r] For the purpose of easy comparison, the tables of references and the other inscriptions found on the Cas¬
tello and Harrisse copies are here literally transcribed, and the variations in nomenclature, etc., both on the maps
and in the keys, are noted. Translations of the references are given later, under the detailed descriptions.
[2] The principal difference between the bouweries and the plantations seems to be that the former were fully
developed farms, with cattle, etc., whereas the latter were probably confined to the raising of tobacco or other
crops. The author has recently learned of the forthcoming publication of a hitherto unrecorded letter, written
by Kiliaen Van Rensselaer, and said to throw new light upon the original bouweries. See forthcoming Hol¬
land Society Year Book, 1916, and Chronology, 1638.
|