( 38 )
task before us, then the policy which has been laid
down can be judged in the light of all the facts....We
believe that the announcement of August 20 was right
and wise, and that the policy which it embodies is the
only possible policy for India." If, as I have endea¬
voured to show, the facts have not been correctly
appreciated, the conclusions deduced from them cannot
be right. We have no quarrel with the policy of the
announcement so far as it lays down that complete
responsible government should be established in India
not at one bound but by stages. But I do not agree
with the view that it necessarily demands that those
stages shall be many and that they shall be reached in
a long period of time. If that were the correct inter¬
pretation of the policy of the announcement, and if that
announcement stood in the way of the needed measure
of reform, the difficulty must be solved by a more liberal
pronouncement. The people of India had no voice in
determining the language of the announcement of
August 20, and the cause of Indian reform must not
be prejudiced by it. But I maintain that there is no¬
thing in that announcement which stands in the way of
a substantial measure of responsible government being
introduced as the first step towards the goal. We have
urged that the Congress-League scheme should be that
first step. But if that is not to be, the proposals under
consideration must yet be expanded and modified to
become adequate to meet the requirements of the
situation. I will indicate below the mam directions
in which, in my opinion, the proposals should be
modified and expanded.
Suggestions for Modlficatioo and Expansion.
27. (i) The many qualifying conditions contained in
the]pronouncement of August 20, created a suspicion
in the minds of Indians that though his Majesty's Gov¬
ernment had declared responsible government to be the
|