The Libraries develop collections, which support the curricular
and research programs of the University. Since it, along with
research libraries at other universities, does not have sufficient
resources to acquire everything published in areas pertinent to the
Universities program, library materials selectors employ the
following general criteria when evaluating titles to be added or
removed from the collections. Particular criteria assume greater or
lesser importance depending on the type of material under
consideration, the resources available, the stated acquisitions
commitment level as detailed elsewhere in this policy statement and
the subject matter covered.
-
Relevance to the actual or potential needs of
Columbia’s educational and research programs
Library materials selectors maintain close ties with the
departments, institutes, and research programs, which comprise
the primary user group for a particular subject or area.
Additionally, they keep, for resource development purposes,
records of research activities, grant received, and the
curriculum for their areas. This information permits the
selectors to anticipate and provide for current and changing
needs of Columbia’s faculty and students.
-
Scope and content
Selectors must gauge each acquisition in terms of the breadth
and depth of information needed by their primary user groups and
quality of the research being presented. Overall, however,
library materials selectors comprehensively collect important
general monographs related to the research interests of the
Columbia community, and selectively acquire more specialized
treatments. Similarly, for periodicals, preference is given to
titles whose coverage of sufficient breadth to be of use and
interest to an entire department, while those of interest to a
small number of individuals, are collected selectively.
-
Depth of the existing collection in the subject and
local availability of the item
When considering the purchase of a new title, a selector must
also consider the strengths and weaknesses of the existing
collection in which the new title will be located. While we do
generally build upon strengths, unneeded redundancy is avoided.
We do purchase duplicates where high use is expected.
Availability of expensive or tangential titles through consortial
arrangements is also considered and an access instead of
ownership option may be considered.
-
Quality
The quality of a title must be evaluated weighing several
subjective factors collectively, i.e., its sponsorship;
scholarship; level of creativity; lasting value; the reputation
of the author, the publisher, the contributors, the editorial
board; the quality and importance of the illustrations;
bibliographies included, etc. None of these are the deciding
factor alone but each are considered as they contribute to or
detracts from the overall quality of the item under
consideration.
-
Currency and timeliness
For many disciplines, particularly the sciences require
up-to-date information. In those areas, preference is given to
titles which report new and revised information in a timely
fashion.
-
Bibliographic accessibility
The contents of periodicals, particularly, require
bibliographic indexing and abstracting (I/A) tools to insure
sufficient user access. Inclusion or exclusion from the major I/A
tools is one of characteristic employed by selectors when
evaluating the subscription to a periodical magazine or
journal.
-
Price
The value of a book, periodical, newspaper, etc. to the
collection cannot be measured only by considering its price. The
price, however, in addition to the other criteria mentioned here,
has to be considered when evaluating a purchase. When evaluating
"free" materials, the cost of acquisitions processing,
cataloging, shelving, and preservation must also be
considered.
-
Language and country of origin
The language of the primary and secondary users of each title
under consideration must be considered. The Libraries do collect
social science and humanities materials in most languages to
support its extensive area studies programs.
|