|
Workshop in Applied Policy Analysis
MPA in Environmental Science and Policy
The Workshop in Applied
Earth Systems Policy Analysis
The Wildlife Conservation Society, The Energy Department of the New York City
Housing Authority, Gateway National Recreation Area, the National Audubon
Society, and EarthAction together with the Alliance for Renewable Energy (ARE)
are all clients for the spring Workshop in the MPA program in Environmental
Science and Policy. In the spring semester, Workshop
groups undertake analytic projects for real-world clients in government
and nonprofit agencies. These teams, working under the supervision of faculty
members, write a report analyzing an actual environmental policy or management
problem faced by their clients. These projects are part of the 3-semester
12-point workshop requirement for the MPA Program. They enable students to
integrate the environmental science learned in the summer semester with the
policy, politics and management issues they have learned throughout the program.
Assessing the Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental/Ecological
Services
Client: The
Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and Forest Trends (FT)
Faculty Advisor: Kathleen
Callahan
This project is
focused on the efforts to use payments for ecological/environmental services
(PES). Payments for environmental services (PES) aim to support the positive
incorporation of environmental externalities through the transfer of funds from
beneficiaries of those environmental services to the service provider. The
WCS, in partnership with the Earth Institute of Columbia University, Enterprise
Works/VITA, Forest Trends, the Land Tenure Center of the University of
Wisconsin, has received a 5 year grant from the U. S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) with the objective of enhancing social, economic and
environmental benefits that may be achieved through sustainable natural
resource management. Key goals in this effort, which is known as TransLinks,
include poverty reduction and equitable governance.
Students in this
workshop group will work with the WCS and its partner, Forest Trends (FT). FT
is a public/private, non profit organization that works to expand the value of
forests to society and promote sustainable forest management and conservation.
In the TransLinks program FT has taken a lead role in using PES for
forest preservation. However, WCS and Forest Trends wish to do an update on
broad PES efforts to date. The MPA ESP students will work to evaluate PES
efforts in areas that may include carbon markets, water accessibility markets
and biodiversity markets.
Retrofitting
Older Apartment Buildings for Energy Efficiency: Practical Proposals for Public
Housing in New York City
Client: Lloyd Kass,
Director of the Energy Department at the New York City Housing Authority
Faculty Advisor: Steven
Cohen
The New York City Housing
Authority has embarked on an effort to scale up its energy-efficient building
retrofit efforts to an "enterprise" level. The workshop group has been asked
to describe and assess comparable efforts to enhance the energy efficiency of
older multi-family residential buildings. The issues facing the NYCHA are
technological, organizational, financial, and behavioral. We will analyze the
questions surrounding these issues and determine the impact of these factors on
energy efficiency programs.
Changing variables in the
financial plans of NYCHA threaten the viability of initiatives which was only
exacerbated in 2008 by the intense variability in energy costs. These
government energy efficiency projects are generally financed with the promise
that the debt service costs are the same or lower than the avoided energy costs
resulting from the improvement. Cost of capital, volatile energy prices, poor
project management, and unrealized energy savings make energy efficiency
initiatives risky enterprises. Due to these risks, agencies and other
contractors generally play it safe. Only easy energy-efficiency measures are
implemented and the cost of the more promising technologies remains too high
for wide adoption. Students will be searching for examples of these problems
outside of New York City and can for examples of strategies and programs that
have reduced these problems. The group has been asked to survey and develop a
set of comparative case studies and concrete examples of successes and failures
and recommend approaches that might be suitable for public housing in NYC.
Gateway's Long-Term
Ecosystem Management Options under Changing Climate Conditions
Client: National Park
Service, Gateway National Recreation Area
Client Contacts: Barry
Sullivan, General Superintendant
Faculty Advisor: Tanya
Heikkila
This Workshop group has been
asked to develop a report that discusses environmental policy implications for
Gateway National Recreation area using conceptual models and comparisons to
other urban centers' reaction to climate change. A conceptual model must be
created to describe the response of Gateway's major ecosystem types to the
various components of climate change such as sea level rise, storm intensity,
precipitation, water and soil temperature increases, and others. To help
identify ecosystem processes or key species groups that may be expected to
change, the cohort will need to determine what the expected response of key
biotic components, processes, and functions of the ecosystems will be to
climate change. Aside from the physical and hydrological predictions of
Gateway, students are asked to examine and compare how different regions are
evaluating and addressing climate change. The student's could seek-out the
climate change programs of major coastal urban centers (NYC, Boston, Miami, LA,
Hong Kong, etc.), identify the focus areas of these places and synthesize
information from these programs that would be relevant to Gateway's objective
of effectively planning for climate change.
Time permitting, students
could also help scope out opportunities for Columbia University to facilitate
and host an open one-day forum roundtable discussion. This would be
comprised of National Park Service urban park leaders, and recognized academic
leaders involved with public policy, recreation and conservation, who would
explore "the role of a National Park in the context of a large urban
environment, for the 21st century."
Quantifying and Reducing a
National Organization's Impact on Global Climate Change and Developing a Model
to be Replicated
Client: National Audubon
Society, Bob Perciasepe, Chief Operating Officer (former EPA Assistant
Administrator for Water (1993-1998) and Air (1998-2002))
Faculty Advisor: Gail
Suchman
National Audubon's mission is
to conserve and restore natural ecosystems, focusing on birds and other
wildlife, and their habitats, for the benefit of humanity and the earth's
biological diversity. Audubon has a national network of over 50 community-based
nature centers (some as old as 70 years and newer ones that are LEED
certified), runs many scientific, educational and advocacy programs, and
publishes Audubon Magazine. National Audubon has a history of leading by example
and desires to further enhance its organization's impact and influence.
Therefore, National Audubon is requesting support for a project that will
provide a comprehensive evaluation of its own carbon footprint and
recommendations for how to reduce it. All of National Audubon's facilities and
property holdings would be covered in this analysis.
The Board of Directors has
established a basic organizational framework for the project in order to reduce
Audubon's impact on global warming. Audubon will determine the "Carbon
Footprint" of their facilities, discover opportunities to improve
"sequestration" at sanctuaries or land holdings, and encourage and make tools
available for all employees to determine their own personal footprint.
Audubon will develop a plan
to achieve a carbon neutral profile considering all of its facilities and land
holdings and will decrease its FY08 greenhouse gas footprint by at least 10% by
FY13.
Audubon has already begun to
collect data for this project. The project team must evaluate the available
data, and identify and fill data gaps to the extent possible. Through
research, the project team will identify various valid methodologies for
calculating contributions to greenhouse gas emissions and will recommend and
implement the appropriate methodology for Audubon. The team will also
recommend actions which National Audubon should take in the short and longer
term, as well as assess financial support options available at the state
or federal level to assist Audubon in its efforts to reduce its carbon
impacts. Finally, the team will use its findings to develop a model to be used
by other organizations and even businesses for quantifying and reducing their
contribution to greenhouse gas emissions.
Renewable Energy Payments
(REPs) Policies for the United States
Client: EarthAction and
the Alliance for Renewable Energy-ARE
Client Contact: Lois
Barber
Faculty
advisor: Sara Tjossem
Renewable
Energy Payment (REP) policies (aka Feed-in Tariffs) are in place in over 40
countries and are being called 'The World 's Most Effective Renewable Energy
Policies'. Research will strengthen ARE's ability to engage in a full scale,
multi-track campaign to bring REPs to the USA. Students will be determining
the successes and failures of REP policies both at the federal and state
level. Asking the question of how REP policies can be integrated with the
Renewable Portfolio Standards (RSPs) policies already in place students will
design a model for REP policy in New York State that is reconsidering its RPS. By
comparing the costs per kwh or producing renewable energy, students can
determine which policies create the best value for ratepayers and the economic
costs and benefits of REPs in Germany and Spain as well as the expected impacts
in the US.
In
terms of job creation and economic development, students will analyze what
effects decentralized RE production has had on job creation and whether REPs could
help create jobs in Florida or Michigan. Students will also analyze what the
investment security merits of REPs that would make RE more financeable would
be, given the credit crunch in the US which would severely inhibit RE growth. Finally,
this workshop group will find and evaluate other policy incentive mechanisms
such as Cap & Trade, Renewable Energy Certificates, Individual Tax Credits,
and Production Tax Credits.
|