|
Learning to Communicate
Environmental Science to Political Decision Makers: Summer Semester Workshop
Midterm Briefings Held July 16, 2008
On Wednesday, July 16, students in the MPA in Environmental
Science and Policy program at Columbia University’s School of International
and Public Affairs gave their first formal workshop briefings of the academic
year. This innovative public policy program includes a year long sequence
workshop where students “learn by doing.”
In the summer and fall semesters, the program’s 59 students are divided
into five teams and analyze a piece of environmental legislation that has been
proposed but not yet enacted. In the summer they analyze and communicate the
science of the environmental issue in the bill. In the fall semester they
assume that these bills have been passed into law and they develop a plan to
implement the new programs. In the spring semester the program’s workshop
features a capstone project that partners students with dedicated public and
non-profit organizations on critical sustainability issues.
“The Summer Workshop is about the process of learning how to
translate science and analysis into operational environmental policy,” said
Director of the MPA-ESP Program Steve Cohen during his introduction of the
Briefings. He further explained that “decision makers have very little
time to cover these [science] issues…but our students have the ability to take
the high-points of these issues and summarize them for decision makers. Our
goal is for students to learn about the process of communicating complex
information and to think about the factors that contribute to effective
communication.”
The midterm briefings presented summaries of the first three outputs
of each project team. The presentations
provided a summary of the legislation or international agreement—major goals
and provisions of the statute or agreement—and provided details on the history and
scientific dimensions of the environmental problem being addressed. The following is a description of the five
student projects presented during this summer’s midterm workshop briefings:
H.R.2774
Solar Energy Research and Advancement Act of 2007
Faculty Advisor: Andrea Schmitz
Professor
Andrea Schmitz is currently the Director of Environment, Health and Safety for
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. In her current role there, she
oversees Con Edison's Environmental Response Team (ERT), which provides
around-the-clock response to environmental and safety incidents. Professor
Schmitz has been leading her cohort this summer in their study of applying
solar energy as an alternative energy source. The Solar Energy Research and
Advancement Act of 2007 supports the research, development, and commercial
application of solar energy technologies.
Specifically, the bill directs the Secretary of Energy to study methods
to integrate concentrating solar power into regional electric transmission
systems and to bring this power to growing electric power load pockets across
the country. The Workshop group is
exploring the problems with current power sources such as coal; issues such as
the exposure to heavy metals and run-off from mines and the polluting air
emissions of coal burning energy plants.
The
bill proposes an alternative to coal and other pollution emitting energy sources. The Solar Energy Research
and Advancement Act of 2007 aims “to support the research, development, and
commercial application of solar energy technologies.” The Workshop
group’s next steps are to analyze the proposed solution of solar energy and learn
to describe the science and applicability of the energy source to potential
investors and policymakers.
S.2204 Global Warming
Wildlife Survival Act
Faculty Advisor:
Matthew Palmer
Serving as an advisor to the US
Fish and Wildlife Service, NYC Parks,
NY State DEC, NJ DEP, and several
NGOs on conservation, restoration, and ecological management issues, Professor
Matthew Palmer brings his wildlife conservation expertise to his Workshop group
this summer. His research interests are primarily in plant community ecology,
with emphases on conservation, restoration, and ecosystem function. Professor
Palmer’s Workshop group is spending this semester learning about the Global
Warming Wildlife Survival Act. This bill
“requires the Secretary of the Interior to establish a national strategy for
assisting wildlife populations and habitats in adapting to the impact of global
warming.” The bill aims to assist
wildlife in adapting to climate change through research and creating new coping
strategies for impacted species. The
goals of the bill center around imperiled species; enhancing the monitoring of
current and prospective programs, guiding restorative efforts with its newly
established advisory board, establishing corridors for wildlife, reducing
threats that are not related to climate, and improving the management wildlife.
The group also outlined the breadth
of why this act is so critical: economic interest, ecological impact, and moral
commitment. The group’s next steps
before they present their work at the August 13 Final Briefings are to study
habitat protection and restoration, the management of migration corridors,
relocation of species, and the monitoring programs that are being developed and
implemented through this Act.
Title VII of the Water Resources Development Act:
Coastal
Louisiana
Ecosystem Restoration
Professor
Heikkila
With
research in the fields of policy analysis and institutional theory, renewable
and natural resource management and policy, and water governance issues with
focuses on comparative analyses of public institutions and water resource
management, Professor Tanya Heikkila brings a sea of knowledge to her group’s
water-centered Workshop. The focus of her
Workshop this summer is to examine Title VII of the Water Resources and
Development Act of 2007. This act calls
for the restoration of the Coastal Louisiana Ecosystem, namely wetlands, swamps
and marshes, with the aim of protecting the local populations from the threat
of storm surge and land loss, as well as modifying the existing flood control
structures and channels. These
human-made altercations to the landscape have severely affected the coastal
hydrology and deltaic cycle in the region, leaving the population dangerously
exposed to storms. By restoring the
ecosystem to a more natural state the group hopes to ultimately protect and
preserve a unique and vital economic region.
The
group’s work thus far has been to examine the Title VII legislation, identify
the problem outlined in the legislation and discover and clearly convey the
science behind the problem.
S 2355
The Climate Change Adaptation Act
Faculty Advisor: Steven Cohen
Professor Steve
Cohen is an expert in New York
City, politics and policy, public management,
environmental policy and management, solid waste management, and citizen
participation. He authors a blog on the
New York Observer’s Green Channel and has written several authoritative texts
on environmental management and policy.
Professor Cohen’s Workshop group
is studying The Climate Change Adaptation Act, examining this climate change
legislation and the environmental problems addressed in it. The Workshop’s
emphasis has been on the impact of climate change on coastlines. The cohorts have also focused on
understanding why government action is needed and what plans the government has
developed and implemented. The Act is designed
to assess impacts of climate change, ensure that the U.S. is fully prepared for these
impacts, and focus on adaptation to climate change. The Act presents a variety of important impacts
ranging from ocean acidification to shifts in the hydrological cycle. The key
environmental problems identified in the legislation range from those affecting
the oceans and coast lines to the effects of severe weather and storms.
Because about 50% of
Americans live within 50 miles of coastline, areas of heightened vulnerability
to climate change, this Act hits close to home.
While natural disasters are already common in coastal areas, climate
change has increased the risks of these. Natural ecosystems have been severely
affected: wetlands have shrunk and disappeared.
But climate change in coastal regions also impacts human infrastructure
like roads, bridges, and subways through flooding, scouring and salinity. Due to the magnitude of climate change
impact, The Climate Change Adaptation Act was designed to assess and prepare
for the impacts of climate change at a national level, provide funding for
research and assessments, establish a Grant program to support Coastal States’
plans, and develop a National Strategic Plan for Climate Change Adaptation
every five years. The Workshop’s next
steps are to analyze the proposed solution and the science behind it and to
predict and learn scientific issues and controversies that are related to the
problem and its solutions.
S. 2728 Twenty-First
Century Water Commission Act of 2008
Professor Kathleen Callahan
With over 35 years worth of experience with the Environmental
Protection Agency in a career that has spanned many of the diverse sections and
departments of the EPA, Professor Kathy Callahan brings a unique perspective in
leading her Workshop. She served as
Region 2 Deputy Regional Administrator for the EPA and her insight is
invaluable to her team. Her group has spent the semester thus far learning
about the bill to establish the Twenty-First Century Water Commission. This Act, sponsored by Senator Johnny
Isakson, aims to study and develop recommendations for a comprehensive water
strategy to address future water needs.
Water quantity and quality are of such concern because
climate change causes droughts and flooding.
Water is needed to support the four greatest human demands: electricity
production, agricultural needs, industrial needs, and residential needs. The Workshop group has learned that seemingly
unrelated social trends – baby-boomer retirement, relocation choices – are
amplifying already problematic scenarios of climate change by increasing demand
in dryer areas. Pollution can also
increase in areas where flooding occurs intensified by larger, less frequent
single-event rainfalls. Suburban
expansion also impacts the quality and quantity of available water.
The bill proposes to establish a commission to develop a national water
strategy that will address water quality and quantity issues the United States
faces and will face over the next 50 years. The commission’s purpose is to study and
project future supply, demand of freshwater in the U.S., and produce a comprehensive
water-use strategy. The group’s next
steps are to conduct analysis and discussion of the Act, explore the science
behind the proposed solutions, predict issues and controversies, and track the
program’s success.
For more information on the MPA-ESP program, please contact Louise Rosen,
Associate Director of the MPA-ESP Program and, at 212.854.3142 or via email at lar46@columbia.edu.
|