![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Gabriel Orozco, Home Run (far view), 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mexican-born conceptual artist Gabriel Orozco's first American retrospective, at the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art (2000), was met with mixed reviews from the American press. Los Angles Times art critic Christopher Knight slammed the exhibition with witty vitriolic headlines: "Orozco's Artwork is Derivative of Duchamp's" and "Conceptually, It's Not Exactly New" (The Los Angeles Times. June 7, 2000 F1+).
In Home Run (1993), Orozco places oranges in cups, vases, and other containers in the windows of apartments across the street from New York's Museum of Modern Art. The gallery walls no longer function as the structural framework to display the work: the actual artwork is outside of the institution, visible just by looking out the window. The gallery walls function differently from how they usually do; in this case, they serve only the purely functional purpose of supporting the architectural framework of an edifice that allows the viewer to see the sculpture from its vantage point. The work of art only exists because of a wall label in the museum. So, instead of the artist creating the work of art simply by signing it, as Duchamp did by signing "R. Mutt" on a urinal, the work exists solely due to the curator creating a wall label. Thus, Orozco has the institution invest an outside object with the status of the work of art. In Empty Shoebox, Orozco radically reorients the tripartite interaction of space, viewer, and object. He specified for an empty shoebox to be placed on the floor, in the corner of a room. Museum directors and curators had problems insuring it, since it could easily get kicked or thrown away.
The beauty of Orozco's work comes from his to ability fold art out into reality, not unlike Duchamp, but in new ways. His retrospective at the Los Angeles Museum of Contemporary Art did not include any new work (artists usually include a few new pieces in a retrospective). Instead, in a self-referential gesture, he recombined his old pieces to create new pieces. Orozco's gesture should not be mistaken as the equivalent of a dog chasing his tail. He is generating something new. His art activates the space around it. He makes a total space, the type of space that one experiences in the real world. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||