Harvard University
Ethan Yeh ][ Luis Hernandez
Ethan Yeh ][ Harvard created its Afro-American
Studies Department over 30 years ago in response to student protests
and a sit-in. Protests for ethnic studies specifically in Asian American,
Latino, and Native American studies began then as well, and has continued
to this day. The Afro-American Department itself did not begin to flourish
until the arrival of Professor Henry Louis Gates in the early 1990's.
Harvard's official stance on ethnic studies is that it is "inherently
comparative." Our Dean of Faculty of Arts and Sciences goes on
to say that, "the creation of narrowly-defined administrative or
curricular entities in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences would be misguided.
Our faculty members do not favor limiting the study of ethnicity to
a handful of groups whose own self-definition has been changing over
time and will no doubt continue to do so. Nor is there a good reason
to limit, or to privilege, the study of some ethnic groups at the expense
of others." This means that they believe ethnic studies at Harvard
should be a broad array of classes that are within existing departments
(except for the Afro-American Department). As a result, there is no
institutional support for ethnic studies because departments have their
own interests and often do not provide resources specifically for ethnic
studies classes, nor do they hire ethnic studies or minority professors.
In 1993, an ad-hoc Faculty Committee on Ethnic Studies (CES) was created
as a result of massive protests over linking grade inflation to the
admission of minority students. Today, the CES is still an ad-hoc committee
and has little power and responsibility. They invite 2 visiting professors
each year for 1 semester, organize conferences and forums related to
ethnic studies (these are rare), and provide 3 faculty research grants
of $2500 for the creation of new ethnic studies classes each (these
were not given out last year because of poor administration). This year,
they began a new thesis prize for Ethnic Studies and are considering
a certificate in ethnic studies (similar to a minor, it was actually
supposed to begin in Fall 2001).
The student support for ethnic studies has been cyclical over the years.
Most of the accomplishments in ethnic studies at Harvard have been the
result of student initiatives. Today, student support is not particularly
strong, but it is growing in light of recent discussions concerning
a Latino Center and the certificate.
Luis Hernandez ][ The status of ethnic
studies at Harvard is both daunting and promising. Following the recent
controversies surrounding President Summers meeting with Professor Cornel
West and his refusal to seriously consider the proposal for a Latino
Studies program, it seems that the opportunity is pressing to formalize
consensus towards an end that shall foster diversity and/or ethnic studies.
However the reality of the present moment as well as historical data
points to the fact that ethnic studies initiatives have been underscored
by blatant opposition and administrative reservations. Within the last
few years what seemed to be promising moment at Harvard for success
on the ethnic studies front, resulted in a grave and disappointing realizing
that we were farther from reaching our goals than we had thought. Primarily
resulting from support from the Harvard Foundation for Intercultural
and Race Relations and as always at the urgency of student activism,
the Committee on Ethnic Studies was considering a certificate program
in Ethnic Studies. As the academic year was ending, students were lead
to believe that the committee approved the certificate program, but
returned to campus in the fall to observe that a new Ethnic Studies
Committee had been appointed (thus changing the composition of the committee)
and the new members reconsidered the proposal and voted against the
certificate program. Prior to the certificate proposal, in 1995 the
academic affairs committee submitted a proposal to the College for an
ethnic studies concentration but was dismissed by the Dean on financial
grounds and philosophical concern about methodology for studying a variety
of ethnic groups. It seems that the administration's position continues
to advocate studying ethnicity within the current departmental structure
of the faculty, and thus it is evident that the powers that be at this
institution favor maintaining the status quo at Harvard. We have been
knocking on the Master's door for over three decades, and have not even
received room at the maids quarters. In light of this, we remain hopefully
that this sleeping giant will lead once again even if at the cost of
a rude awakening. Should history teach us a lesson, either Harvard is
right, or we are insightful.