Introduction
Since the launch of economic reforms in the 1980s, China’s global position has changed significantly, triggering a surge in Chinese nationalism. In the Western media and some scholarly discussions, this new wave of nationalism is often viewed as an attempt by the Chinese state to regain legitimacy by shifting the focus away from failing communist beliefs. This teaching unit takes a broader look at the phenomenon by examining different types of nationalism in contemporary China. It aims to help students understand how these nationalisms formed for different political purposes and how the conflicts among them reveal the true nature of nationalist currents and reflect political tensions between the Chinese state, elites, and ordinary citizens.Audience and Uses
The unit could be useful in a variety of courses including but not limited to:
The unit can be used by itself or in combination with the following other units on race, ethnicity, and nationality in East Asia:
Student Reading
ZHAO, Suisheng. Chapter 1 “Rise of Chinese Nationalism: Causes, Content, and International Ramifications,” pp. 8-36 in Nation-State by Construction. California: Stanford University Press, 2004.
Zhao’s book explores in great detail the historical origins of nationalism in contemporary China. He argues that by identifying and discussing different types of nationalism, we can see that nationalism is not the sole province of state propaganda and intellectual discourse. Populist sentiment also plays a major role. The different types of nationalism represent the arguments over the content of nationalism. They also illustrate the political conflicts between different ethnic groups and elite groups and between the state and its citizens, all of whom have their own interests and ideological agendas. Discussion Questions
Further Reading for the Instructor
BROWN, Melissa J. Is Taiwan Chinese: The Impact of Culture, Power, and Migration on Changing Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004.CHUN, Allen. “Fuck Chineseness: on the Ambiguities of Ethnicity as Culture and as Identity.” Boundary 23.2 (1996): pp. 111-138. GRIES, Peter Hays. “Popular Nationalism and State Legitimation in China,” pp.180-194 in State and Society in 21st-Century China: Crisis, Contention, and Legitimation. Peter Hays GRIES and Stanley ROSEN, eds. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004. GUO, Yingjie. Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China: The Search for National Identity under Reform. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004. MACKERRAS, Colin. “What is China? Who is Chinese? Han-Minority Relations, Legitimacy, and the State,” pp. 216-234, in State and Society in 21st-Century China: Crisis, Contention, and Legitimation. Peter Hays GRIES and Stanley ROSEN, eds. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004. WEI, C. X. George and Xiaoyuan LIU, eds. Exploring Nationalisms of China: Themes and Conflicts. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2002. ZHAO, Dingxin. “An Angle on Nationalism in China Today: Attitudes among Beijing Students after Belgrade 1999.” The China Quarterly 172 (2002): pp. 885-905. Additional Classroom Materials
The following article and film can be used along with the materials above or taught independently for an additional session or two.Student Reading XIAO, Zhiwei. “Nationalism in Chinese Popular Culture: A Case Study of The Opium War,” pp. 41-54 in Exploring Nationalisms of China: Themes and Conflicts. C.X. George WEI and Xiaoyuan LIU, eds. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2002. This short article discusses how popular concepts of nationalism were constructed through feature films on the Opium War. The most interesting part of the article is the comparison between the 1997 film The Opium War and another film on the same event, Lin Zexu (1959). Xiao compares how British invaders are portrayed differently in the two films and how a historically denounced “traitor” in Lin Zexu is treated with a certain degree of sympathy in The Opium War. The comparison demonstrates how intellectuals and business elites now define nationalism with a pragmatic approach, rather than basing it strictly on moral principles. The article also reveals how this popular nationalism is actually endorsed by the state, even though The Opium War was produced solely with private funds. This reading lends itself to discussions of how Chineseness is defined through the participation of different social actors with different political, economic, and ideological agendas in different historical periods.Film XIE, Jin, dir. The Opium War (Yapian zhanzheng) (feature film) 1997. 150 minutes. In Mandarin with English subtitles. Unfortunately, this film is not widely available from libraries or for rent. It is available for purchase from: http://us.yesasia.com/en/PrdDept.aspx/code-c/section-videos/pid-1001835215/ and http://www.hkflix.com/xq/asp/filmID.527034/qx/details.htm. Discussion Questions
|
||