Disclosure
|
|
|
Equity interest in Genetix Pharm. Inc. |
|
Exclusive license of retroviral cell
lines from Columbia |
|
No direct participation in MDR clinical
trials |
|
Columbia U. annual reporting |
|
FDA |
Gene Therapy
|
|
|
|
Transfer of genes into cells |
|
Expression of transferred genes |
|
To correct a defect |
|
To provide a new function |
Gene Replacement/Homologous
Recombination
|
|
|
Best theoretical approach |
|
Very low efficiency |
|
Useful in ES cells |
|
Not practical at present |
Gene Addition
|
|
|
Best practical approach |
|
High efficiency possible |
|
Used most often |
Vectors for Gene Transfer
|
|
|
Naked DNA |
|
DNA in lipid complexes |
|
Adenoviruses |
|
Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) |
|
Retroviruses |
|
Lentiviruses |
Slide 6
Adenoviruses
|
|
|
Very high titers |
|
Can be used in vivo |
|
Do not integrate; episomal |
|
Are immunogenic and provoke
inflammatory responses |
Adeno-associated Viruses
|
|
|
Hiigh titers |
|
Can be used in vivo |
|
Variable integration |
|
Are immunogenic |
Retroviruses
|
|
|
Advantages: Acceptable titers and gene
expression; chromosomal integration; stable producer lines available; safety
known |
|
Disadvantages: Require cell division
for stable integration |
|
Uses: Bone marrow stem cell gene
therapy |
|
Lentiviruses better |
Uses of Gene Therapy
|
|
|
Correct genetic defects-ADA,
hemophilia, sickle cell, Gaucher’s disease |
|
Add new gene functions-angiogenesis,
cancer |
Gene Therapy Versus Protein
Therapy
|
|
|
Potentially permanent correction with
gene as opposed to daily requirement for drug |
|
Must be effective in level of
expression and expression must be regulatable |
Systems to Study Gene
Transfer
|
|
|
Tissue culture cells: relatively easy |
|
Mice |
|
Larger animals - dogs, primates |
|
Humans |
Factor 8 and 9 Deficiencies
|
|
|
Hemophilia A and B |
|
Factor 8 and 9 concentrates and
recombinant proteins effective |
|
Factor 8 and 9 genes in AAV or
adenovirus injected into muscle raises levels in mice and dogs |
|
Human Factor 9 AAV trial into muscle
underway (High) |
|
Evidence for immune responses |
Ischemic Vascular Disease
|
|
|
Angioplasty, bypass surgery available |
|
VEGFs can grow new blood vessels |
|
VEGF gene as naked DNA injected into ischemic legs relieves
ischemia |
|
VEGF gene in AAV and adenovirus
injected into ischemic cardiac muscle being tested |
Anti-Cancer Gene Therapy
|
|
|
Add a toxic gene to tumor cells (HSVTK) |
|
Add normal tumor suppressor gene-p53 or
Rb |
|
Add anti-sense oligonucleotide to
oncogenes (bcr-abl) |
|
Provoke immune response to tumor using
CD34+ or dendritic cells transduced with antigens |
Adding a Toxic Gene
|
|
|
|
Herpes simplex thymidine kinase
(HSVTK)gene: |
|
Specifically phosphorylates gancyclovir
and converts it to a toxic product |
|
End result is tumor cell killing |
|
Injected into brain tumors
post-operatively |
|
Patients treated with gancyclovir |
|
Results equivocal |
Anti-Sense to Oncogenes
|
|
|
|
Oligonucleotides with anti-sense to: |
|
BCR-Abl in CML |
|
Mutated Ras |
|
BCL |
|
Results to date equivocal |
Tumor Suppressor Genes
Increase Anti-tumor Immune
Responses
|
|
|
Injecting cytokine genes into tumors
and using as vaccines |
|
Adding tumor antigens to antigen
presenting cells (dendritic cells) and using as vaccines |
|
|
Cancer Gene Therapy
|
|
|
Protecting marrow cells from the toxic
effects of chemotherapy |
|
Use of the multiple drug resistance
gene |
Slide 21
Slide 22
Slide 23
Critical Plasmids for Safe
Retroviral Production
MDR Gene Therapy
|
|
|
MDR gene product is a p-glycoprotein |
|
Pumps natural compounds out of cells |
|
Many classes of anti-cancer drugs
require MDR pump for removal |
|
Normal marrow cells have little or no
MDR gene function |
|
Add a normal MDR gene to marrow stem
cells |
|
Provides drug resistance |
|
Can also be used to select transduced
cells |
Slide 26
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 29
Slide 30
MDR Transduction in Mice
|
|
|
|
MDR gene present and expressed up to
one year |
|
Evidence for stem cell transduction |
|
Taxol selects MDR-transduced cells |
Challenges of Human Gene
Therapy
|
|
|
Complete safety |
|
Unique receptors on human HSC |
|
High level and efficient gene transfer |
Slide 33
Autotransplantation
|
|
|
Harvest stem cells from patient |
|
Transduce stem cells with vector
containing gene of interest |
|
Return transduced stem cells to patient |
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells
|
|
|
Capable of marrow reconstitution |
|
Easily harvested by out-patient
apheresis |
|
Mobilized with chemotherapy/growth
factors |
|
Efficiently transduced |
|
Repeated harvesting and use |
|
Cells of choice for marrow
transplantation |
Progenitor Assays
|
|
|
Methylcellulose plates |
|
Measure BFU-E and CFU-GM |
|
PCR-positive colonies |
|
Colonies with and without taxol |
Transduction Protocol
|
|
|
|
CD34+ cells cultured on fibronectin
plates with IL-3, IL-6 and SCF |
|
48 hr pre-incubation |
|
Two changes of retroviral supernatant
over 24 hrs |
|
Successful MDR transduction of
methylcellulose colonies |
|
Resistance to taxol |
Summary
|
|
|
These results indicated the feasibility
of using CD34+ PBPC MDR transduction to provide drug resistanceof marrow in
Phase 1 clinical trials |
Columbia MDR Phase1Clinical
Trial
|
|
|
Safety demonstrated: no delayed
engraftment or RCR |
|
Feasibility shown: Large scale
retroviral supernatants and CD34+ cells used in scale-up |
|
Pre-infusion: High-level CD34+
transduction in BFU-E and CFU-GM |
|
Post-infusion: 2/5 patients with low
level MDR PCR + cells |
Requirements for HSC Gene
Transfer
|
|
|
Stem cells required for short- and
long-term marrow repopulation |
|
Progenitors (BFU-E and CFU-GM) are
irrelevant to repopulation |
|
True stem cells (NOD-SCID) required for
marrow homing, marrow repopulation and expansion |
Murine Studies-Qin 1999
|
|
|
Untransduced (fresh) cells outcompete
transduced cells for marrow engraftment both short- and long-term |
|
Two to 4 day delay in infusing
untransduced cells after infusing transduced cells increases short- and
long-term repopulation of transduced cells |
Indiana Trial- MDR Gene
Therapy
|
|
|
Pts with relapsed germ cell tumors |
|
Intensive carboplatin and etoposide
therapy followed by either MDR-transduced or untransduced HSC |
|
Three cycles of oral etopside |
|
CH-296 fibronectin fragment
(Retronectin) |
|
Abonour-Nature Medicine 2000 |
Slide 43
Indiana Gene Therapy Trial
|
|
|
Best results reported to date of HSC
gene therapy |
|
MDR-transduced cells persist up to 1
year and are selectable with drug |
|
TPO, SCF and G-CSF are best growth
factor combination |
|
Retronectin fragment used |
Slide 45
Indiana Trial: Summary
|
|
|
Best HSC gene transfer and expression
to date |
|
MDR-transduced cells selected by
chemotherapy |
|
Retronectin effect positive |
|
TPO, SCF, G-CSF growth factors best |
|
Lack of competition of fresh and
transduced cells critical |
NOD-SCID Mouse Assay
|
|
|
|
Only valid assay for human HSC |
|
MDR-transduce human cord blood CD34+
cells |
|
5 cytokines, Retronectin |
|
Plate for MDR PCR +colonies in MC |
|
Inject cells into NOD-SCID |
|
Analyze NOD-SCID 5-6 weeks later |
NOD-SCID Mouse Engraftment
MDR-Transduced HSC in
NOD-SCID Mouse - MDR PCR
|
|
|
|
|
Methylcellulose colonies: PCR+ |
|
Pre- NOD-SCID: 20/30 (66%) |
|
Post-NOD-SCID: |
|
Mock: 0/50 + (0%) |
|
A12M1: 16/168 + (10%) |
Summary: MDR-Transduced HSC
in NOD-SCID Mouse
|
|
|
MDR transduction of human HSC achieved |
|
Transduction efficiency comparable to
that of clinical trial:1-10% of human cells |
|
Conditions: 5 cytokines, no polybrene,
Retronectin, multiple viral exposures |
Amphotropic Retroviral
Packaging Lines
|
|
|
AM12 et al |
|
Titers between 104 and106 |
|
Limited receptor expression on human
HSC |
|
Cannot be concentrated |
|
Safety and scale-up documented in human
clinical trials |
|
Low-level transduction efficiency in
human clinical trials |
VSV-G Envelope Packaging
Lines
|
|
|
|
High-titer |
|
Virus can be concentrated |
|
Transient packaging due to VSV-G
toxicity |
|
Adding plasmids to 293T cells |
|
Plasmids require SV40 T antigen
expression |
|
Variable packaging and titers |
|
Potential recombinational events |
|
Difficult to scale-up as compared to
stable lines |
RD114 Envelope Packaging
Lines
|
|
|
Transient supernatants produced |
|
High-titer |
|
Can be concentrated |
|
Efficiently transduce human HSC as
tested in NOD-SCID mice (Kelly et al 2000, Gatlin et al 2001) |
Stable RD114 Packaging Line
(M. Ward)
|
|
|
Moloney gag-pol in 3T3 cells |
|
Add RD114 gene with phleomycin
selection |
|
Isolate high titer clones with NeoR
gene and G418 |
|
Make retroviral supernatants |
|
Concentrate virus by centrifugation |
|
Can transfer G418 resistance to human
CD34+ cells |
|
Can transfer normal b globin gene into
sickle CD34+ cells |
Current Bank lab GT
Goals-2003
|
|
|
Better HSC transduction - new envelopes
(RD114); transient VSV-G packaging lines |
|
Concentrate on human globin gene
therapy using Leboulch lentiviral vector |
|
Use NOD-SCID mouse model to predict
human HSC transduction |
Cure of Children with
X-SCID
|
|
|
Most successful human trial to date |
|
T cells lack gC cytokine receptor
required for lymphoid proliferation |
|
Retroviral transfer of gC cytokine
receptor gene into CD34+ cells |
|
Autotransplantation |
|
Selection of corrected cells |
|
Normal immune function in 7/9 patients |
|
T cell leukemia (clonal) in 2/9
patients 3 years post-transduction |
Leukemia in
Children with X-SCID
|
|
|
Similar insertional mutagenesis events
in both children |
|
Unregulated gC cytokine receptor gene
inserted into LMO2 locus |
|
Activation of LMO2, a proliferative
gene |
|
A rare event in an early T cell/HSC
that leads to a leukemic transformation |
|
Slow growth and eventual proliferation
of the clone |
|
May be prevented by regulated gC
cytokine receptor gene |
Lentiviral Vectors
|
|
|
Transduce non-dividing cells |
|
Can transduce murine and human HSC
efficiently |
|
Very high titers |
|
Better for globin gene therapy |
|
Can cure mouse models of human sickle
and thalassemia |
|
Safety issues |
Slide 59
Lentiviral Plasmids
Slide 61
Successful b Thal Gene
Therapy
|
|
|
May et al: Nature 2000 |
|
b globin gene correction in b
thalassemic mice |
|
Lentiviral vectors with extensive b -LCR elements used |
|
Gene-modified cells produce b globin in
vivo |
|
Correction of thalassemia phenotype |
Successful Sickle Gene
Therapy
|
|
|
Pawliuk et al: Science
2001 |
|
b globin gene correction in two mouse
models of sickle cell |
|
Lentiviral vectors with extensive b -LCR elements used |
|
Gene-modified cells produce b globin in
vivo |
|
Correction of sickle phenotype |
Sickle Mouse Models
Leboulch Globin Lentiviral
Vector
Slide 66
Current Gene Therapy
Experiments - 4/03
|
|
|
Viruses with new envelopes - RD114 |
|
New
incubation conditions- BIT media, new cytokines |
|
NOD-SCID mouse assay for true HSC -
CD34+ CD38- cells |
|
Use of lentiviral vectors in human
globin gene therapy |
|
|