M 4225 Science of Health
Promotion & Disease Prevention
What is Health???
|
|
|
|
traditional medicine - absence of disease |
|
WHO (1947) – complete physical, mental & social well-being, not merely
absence of disease and infirmity |
|
Murray & Zentner – state of well-being
(where)…person uses purposeful, adaptive responses…to maintain relative
stability and comfort |
|
strive for personal objectives &
cultural goals |
Gorin and Arnold
|
|
|
antithesis of disease (dis-ease) |
|
balanced state |
|
growth |
|
functionality |
|
goodness of fit |
|
wholeness, well-being |
|
empowerment and transcendence |
G&A : Healthy Behaviors
|
|
|
smoking cessation |
|
eating well |
|
physical activity |
|
sexual awareness |
|
injury prevention |
|
substance safety |
|
oral health |
|
self development |
|
productivity |
Healthy People 2000
|
|
|
|
US federal program with 3 goals & 22
areas of risk reduction : |
|
increase healthy life span |
|
decrease health disparities |
|
universal access to preventive services |
|
1995 progress report : |
|
50% objectives moving toward target |
|
18% moving away from target |
|
3 % no change |
|
29% QNS |
Health People 2010
|
|
|
|
prevention agenda for the US with 28 areas
of focus; 2 major goals |
|
increase quality & quantity of healthy
life |
|
eliminate health disparities |
|
leading health indicators |
|
physical activity |
|
overweight & obesity |
|
tobacco use |
|
substance abuse |
|
responsible sexual behavior |
|
mental health |
|
injury and violence |
|
environmental quality |
|
access to health care |
Criteria for Health
Promotion Programs
|
|
|
address carefully defined, modifiable risk
behaviors that are measurable in target group |
|
reflect consideration of special
characteristics, needs & preferences of target |
|
effective and appropriate for setting |
|
make optimum use if available resources |
|
organized and implemented so effect &
outcomes can be measured and evaluated |
Health Promotion Theories
|
|
|
|
emerging field |
|
previously, behavioral and social science
theory most common |
|
focus on individual and ID-ing and
quantifying determinants of behavior |
|
health belief models |
|
theory of reasoned action |
Assumptions about
individual-level determinant theories
|
|
|
individual is decision maker |
|
good health is valued; will change behavior
to prevent ‘bad health’ |
|
all behavior is volitional |
|
cognitive predispositions drive health
behaviors |
|
research evidence does indicate that these
theories are effective |
Process of change….
|
|
|
|
pre-contemplation |
|
no plans to change ever! |
|
contemplation |
|
increasing awareness of need for change |
|
preparation |
|
planning to take action….soon…. |
|
action |
|
steps taken to modify a behavior or
environment |
|
maintenance |
|
consistent engagement in new behavior |
Change may be facilitated
or ‘pushed’ by crisis….
|
|
|
|
a dis-equilibrium |
|
emotional and cognitive, where old/usual coping mechanisms and/or
problem solving skills ineffective |
|
developmental/predictable vs.
accidental/situational |
|
identifiable points in life cycle where new
coping skills and problem solving necessary |
|
unexpected ‘accidents’ necessitating new
coping skills |
|
|
Antecedents of crisis
theory…
|
|
|
|
|
Lindemann |
|
precursor of PTSD; also grieving stages |
|
Caplan |
|
transitional period, self limiting to 4-6
weeks |
|
context of event important |
|
intervention most successful at height of
crisis |
|
Aquilera and Messick |
|
balancing factors include realistic
perception of problem, amount and quality of social support and caliber of
coping mechanisms |
Other emerging models
|
|
|
|
precaution adoption/transtheoretical |
|
steps of decision-to-take-precautions
process ~ previously un-identified threat |
|
information-motivation-behavioral skills |
|
helps understand factors which influence
choices about health behaviors |
|
elaboration likelihood |
|
framework for understanding attitude
formation and change facilitation |
|
authoritative parenting |
|
not ‘authoritarian’ – good for adolescents
engaged in risky behaviors |
"food for thought……."
|
|
|
|
food for thought……. |
|
how does the concept of ‘boundaries’ –
separation of personal and professional ideas and beliefs – affect health
promotion and disease prevention? |
|
do nurses have an ‘edge’ in health promotion
and disease prevention activities? Why
or why not? |