Outdoor and Indoor Air Pollution
Overview
|
|
|
The natural atmosphere |
|
Outdoor pollutants and their sources |
|
Indoor air pollution |
|
Health effects of air pollution |
|
Measurement of particle pollution |
|
Climate change |
|
|
|
|
Slide 3
Troposphere
|
|
|
Lowest 10 km of atmosphere |
|
Contains 75% of the atmospheric mass |
|
The layer in which most weather
phenomena occur, e.g., frontal passage, storms, winds |
|
The layer in which most air pollution
problems occur |
|
Energy balance is key factor |
Slide 5
Air set in motion by:
|
|
|
Absorption of energy at surface
followed by transfer of heat to lowest layer of air |
|
Heated parcels become buoyant relative
to nearby cooler parcels, thereby rising |
|
Rising of air parcel leaves lower
pressure at surface |
|
Dense, cool air moves towards the area
of low pressure |
|
Pressure gradient force drives winds |
Slide 7
Slide 8
Slide 9
Slide 10
Air Pollutants of Human
Health Concern
|
|
|
|
Carbon monoxide |
|
Sulfur dioxide |
|
Nitrogen dioxide |
|
Volatile organics |
|
Ozone |
|
Particulate matter |
|
Sulfates, nitrates, organics, elemental
carbon, lead and other metals |
Carbon Monoxide - CO
|
|
|
Colorless, odorless gas |
|
Primary pollutant, emitted by
incomplete combustion of biomass or fossil fuels |
|
Binds strongly with hemoglobin,
displacing oxygen |
|
Emissions reduction by higher
temperature combustion and use of catalytic converters on motor vehicles |
Sulfur Dioxide – SO2
|
|
|
Primary pollutant, emitted by
combustion of fuels containing sulfur; also metal smelting |
|
Irritates upper respiratory tract |
|
Converted in atmosphere to acid
sulfates |
|
Emissions reductions by building taller
smoke stacks, installing scrubbers, or by reducing sulfur content of fuel
being burned |
Slide 14
Slide 15
Slide 16
Slide 17
Slide 18
Nitrogen Dioxide – NO2
|
|
|
Formed by oxidation of NO, which is
produced with high temperature combustion (NO2 is a secondary
pollutant) |
|
Oxidant that can irritate the lungs and
hinder host defense |
|
A key precursor of ozone formation |
|
Emissions reductions by engine redesign
and use of catalytic converters |
Volatile Organic Compounds
VOCs
|
|
|
Products of incomplete combustion,
evaporation of liquid fuels, atmospheric reactions, and release from
vegetation (both primary and secondary) |
|
Wide range of compounds with varying
health effects |
|
Another key ozone precursor |
|
Emissions reductions by high
temperature combustion and control of evaporation, e.g., during refueling of
cars |
Ozone – O3
|
|
|
Secondary pollutant, formed via
photochemical reactions in the atmosphere from NOx and VOC in the presence of
sunlight |
|
Strong oxidant that damages cells
lining the respiratory system |
|
Concentrations often highest downwind
of source regions |
|
Emissions reductions by control of NOx
and VOC emissions, especially from motor vehicles |
Slide 22
Slide 23
Particulate Matter - PM
|
|
|
Products of combustion, atmospheric
reactions, and mechanical processes |
|
Wide range of particle sizes |
|
Wide range of physical/chemical
properties |
|
Wide range of health impacts, including
premature death |
|
Control by filtration, electrostatic
precipitation, and reduction of precursor gases |
Slide 25
Slide 26
Slide 27
Slide 28
Slide 29
Slide 30
Slide 31
Slide 32
Figure 3.2 Trends in
estimated U.S. Lead Emissions
Figure 3.3 Trends in U.S.
Ambient Lead Concentrations
Indoor Air Pollution
|
|
|
Combustion is principal source:
cooking, smoking, heating |
|
Dilution and dispersion are limited,
especially nearest the source |
|
Pollutants of greatest importance
include: CO, NO2, PM, VOCs |
|
Indoor concentrations often far higher
than outdoors, even in urban areas |
|
Those who spend the most time indoors
near the source will be most impacted |
Slide 36
Slide 37
Slide 38
Slide 39
Slide 40
Slide 41
Slide 42
Slide 43
Slide 44
Slide 45
Slide 46
Slide 47
Health Effects of Air
Pollution
|
|
|
|
Historical experience provides strong
evidence for causal relationship between air pollution and premature death |
|
Modern epidemiology studies have
consistently found significant associations |
|
Two primary epidemiologic study
designs: |
|
Time series studies of acute effects |
|
Cohort or cross-section studies of
chronic effects |
|
Let’s look at the evidence for particle
health effects… |
Slide 49
Slide 50
Slide 51
Air Pollution Epidemiology
|
|
|
Provides most directly relevant results
for policy makers |
|
Assesses effects of real mix of
pollutants on human populations |
|
Pollutants tend to co-vary, making it
hard to distinguish effects |
|
Can demonstrate associations between
outcome and exposure, but not cause and effect |
|
Must control for confounding factors |
|
Exposure assessment is “ecologic” |
Time Series Epidemiology
|
|
|
Addresses effects in narrow time window |
|
Involves multiple regression analysis
of long series of daily observations |
|
Large number of studies have reported
significant associations between daily deaths and/or hospital visit counts
and daily average air pollution. |
|
Time series design avoids spatial
confounding; however, temporal confounding due to seasons and weather must be
addressed. |
|
Particles often appear most important,
but CO, SO2, NO2, and/or ozone may also play roles. |
|
For example, NMMAPS Study |
Slide 54
Cohort Epidemiology
|
|
|
Address long-term exposure-response
window |
|
Large populations in multiple cities
enrolled and then followed for many years to determine mortality experience |
|
Cox proportional hazards modeling to
determine associations with pollution exposure |
|
Must control for spatial confounders,
e.g., smoking, income, race, diet, occupation |
|
Assessment of confounders at individual
level is an advantage over cross-sectional, “ecologic” studies |
|
|
Slide 56
Slide 57
Slide 58
Slide 59
Slide 60
Conclusion
|
|
|
“Long-term exposure to
combustion-related fine particle air pollution is an important environmental
risk factor for cardiopulmonary and lung cancer mortality.” |
Human Health Effects of
Airborne Particulate Matter
|
|
|
Daily time-series studies have
demonstrated small but consistent associations of PM with mortality and
hospital admissions, reflecting acute effects. |
|
Acute effects on lung function, asthma
exacerbations, and other outcomes |
|
Multi-city prospective cohort studies
have shown increased mortality risk for cities with higher long-term PM
concentrations, reflecting chronic effects. |
Implications
|
|
|
Acute effects are well documented but
of uncertain significance |
|
Chronic effects imply very large
impacts on public health. |
|
A new US national ambient air quality
standard for PM2.5 was established in 1997, largely based on the
cohort epidemiology evidence |
|
Mechanistic explanation for chronic
effects remains unclear |
|
Weaknesses in exposure assessment
limits interpretation |
Slide 64
It is also unclear…
|
|
|
|
Whether a threshold exists |
|
Who is at risk due to |
|
Higher exposures |
|
Greater susceptibility |
|
What particle components are most toxic |
|
Which sources should be controlled |
|
|
Measurement of Airborne
Particulate Matter
|
|
|
Getting the size right |
|
A look at some field studies |
|
|
|
|
Slide 67
Slide 68
Slide 69
Slide 70
Slide 71
Slide 72
Slide 73
Slide 74
Slide 75
Slide 76
Slide 77
Slide 78
Slide 79
Analysis of Particle
Samples
|
|
|
Mass determined by weighing Teflon
filter before and after sampling under controlled conditions |
|
Elemental carbon estimated by light
absorption |
|
Analysis of trace elements by ICP-mass
spectrometry |
Slide 81
Slide 82
Slide 83
Winter NYC Individual
Data:
Indoor and Outdoor vs. Personal Absorbance
Slide 85
Slide 86
Slide 87
Elevated personal samples
are consistent with steel dust in subway air!
Preliminary Conclusions
|
|
|
We see strong urban influences on air
toxic exposures for some particle components. |
|
Personal exposures are closely
associated with outdoor concentrations of black carbon, an indicator of
diesel exhaust particles. |
|
Diesel particle exposures are
associated with lung cancer and have been suggested to play a role in asthma. |
|
New studies underway to examine the
diesel/asthma link. |
Slide 90
Slide 91
Slide 92
The Greenhouse Gases
Slide 94
Slide 95
Slide 96
US greenhouse gas emission
trends
Slide 98
Slide 99
Impacts of Climate Change
|
|
|
|
General warming; greater at poles;
greater in winter |
|
Sea level rise |
|
Changing rainfall patterns |
|
Greater variability and intensity of
weather extremes |
|
Longer and deeper droughts |
|
More frequent and extreme storms |
Climate Change and Public
Health
|
|
|
Changing patterns of rainfall will have
profound effects on local agriculture, water supply, and well-being |
|
Heat-related mortality and morbidity |
|
Death and injury due to extreme storms |
|
Changing patterns of vector-borne
diseases |
|
Air pollution |
|
Ability to adapt will vary with income
level |
Slide 102
Slide 103
Slide 104
New York Climate and Health
Project
|
|
|
How might health in the NY metropolitan
region be affected by climate and land use change? |
|
Mailman School of Public Health: |
|
Patrick Kinney (PI) – Public health
impact analysis |
|
|
|
Goddard Institute for Space Studies: |
|
Cynthia Rosenzweig – Global and
regional climate modeling |
|
|
|
LDEO: Chris Small – Remote sensing |
|
|
|
Hunter College: Bill Solecki – Regional
land-use/land-cover modeling |
|
|
|
SUNY Albany: Christian Hogrefe – Regional air quality
modeling |
|
|
|
Duke University: Roni Avissar – Regional climate modeling |
Slide 106