The foremost requirement is a systematic census of published and unpublished texts to determine what was written from 1550-1750. These chronological
boundaries, it should be stated at once, are themselves subject to revision as the appropriate temporal framework. As noted, each Sanskrit discipline has a
history of change specific to it, and while large overall trends may be noticed, no one periodization will easily accommodate all the knowledge systems
under analysis. A starting point of 1550 is chosen in recognition of the activities, in north India, of the logician Raghunatha Siromani (Navadvip),the leading
new (navya ) scholar in the eyes of many seventeenth- and eighteenth-century intellectuals; and, in south India, of Appayya Diksita (Madurai), who
profoundly influenced later scholarship in a variety of disciplines. An endpoint in 1750 is suggested by the approximate death-date of Nagesa Bhatta
(Avadh),the last scholar to produce major new works on grammar, poetics, and law.
The URL of this page is: http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pollock/sks/manuscripts/index.html