===
0700,
12
===

 

{700,12}

thaa vuh bhii ik zamaanah naale jab aatishii;N the
chaaro;N :taraf se jangal jaltaa dahar dahar thaa

1) 'those were the days', when the laments were fiery/flaming--
2) from/in all four directions, the wilderness/'jungle' used to burn audibly/cracklingly

 

Notes:

S. R. Faruqi:

dahar dahar jalnaa = to burn with a sound/voice [aavaaz]

The expression dahar dahar jalnaa is an exceedingly fresh and effective image. Ahmad Mushtaq too has used that image very well, and it's possible that he might have seen it in Mir and then used it:

aag to chaaro;N or lagii hai pattii pattii bha;Rak rahii hai
daha;R daha;R jaltii hai;N shaa;xe;N dekhuu;N aur gu;zartaa jaa))uu;N

[fire has caught in all four directions, every leaf is flaring up,
the branches burn audibly/cracklingly; I would look and keep on passing by]

This is what's called 'taking creative advantage'-- not a crude/uncouth imitation in the style of Firaq Sahib! With regard to mood, and to freshness of words, this verse recalls Mir's

{124,2}.

Both are very fine verses.

Mir has deliberately and poetically written dahar dahar ; and with the warrant [sanad] of this very verse, [the dictionaries] farhang-e aa.sifiyah and nuur ul-lu;Gaat have entered dahar dahar jalnaa as an idiom. In reality the idiom is dha;R dha;R jalnaa or daha;R daha;R jalnaa (Platts). Ahmad Mushtaq has versified it correctly, and Mir, with regard to the wordplay of the rhyme, has changed the retroflex ;R [raa-e hindii]. Up to the first half of the eighteenth century, poets used to make use of such freedoms. A verse of Sauda's is noted below, but this opening-verse of his makes the matter entirely clear [because in it an ordinary re is rhymed with a retroflex ;Re]:

saaqii siimii;N tirii shab dekh kar gorii gorii
sharm se sham((a hu))ii jaatii hai tho;Rii tho;Rii

[Cupbearer, having seen by night your bright, white silveriness,
from shame the candle keeps becoming less and less]

From Jamia Millia, Dr. ((abd ul-rashiid has informed me that the idiom can also be dahr dahr jalnaa , with the scansion of = - = - [faa((ilaat], as is proved by the following verses. By Mir Sajjad:

hotii nahii;N hai sard hamaare yih dil kii aag
laagii hai jis zamaane se jaltii hai dahr dahr

[it doesn't cool down, this fire in our heart,
from the time when it caught, it has burned audibly/cracklingly]

By Sauda:

;Thiik hotii hai jis gha;Rii dopahar
lage hai dahr dahr jalne dahar

[it's fine, at whatever time afternoon comes,
my fate has begun to burn audibly/cracklingly [like a time signal]]

It's surprising that all the dictionaries have turned out to be devoid of this idiom. Dr. 'Abd ul-Rashid has also pointed out to me a verse by a;hsan ul-diin bayaan :

mashshad-e parvaanah raushan kyuu;N nah hove dahr dahr
jis kii baalii;N par tamaam-e shab kha;Rii rotii hai sham((a

[why wouldn't the tomb of the Moth be illumined dahr dahr
at whose headboard all night the candle stands weeping?]

But in my opinion here dahr dahr has the meaning of 'at all times', because the idiom is dahar dahar jalnaa , not dahar dahar raushan honaa .

FWP:

SETS == EK; IDIOMS
MOTIFS
NAMES
TERMS

Although I usually go for painstakingly literal translation, thaa vuh bhii ik zamaanah is so colloquial that to render it as 'even/also that was a single/particular/unique/excellent era' just seems absurd. Something like 'those were the days' (which similarly can't be captured in English by taking it as a mere literal identification of which days are under discussion) seems much more to the point. There's a tone of nostalgic relish that comes with the idiom.

Probably the original idiom dha;R dha;R jalnaa was onomotopoetic, and through those great old Indic retroflex sounds echoed the crackling and popping of a vigorous fire.

The speaker seems to be nostalgic for those days, as he wistfully recalls a time when his now-burnt-out laments had such a fiery power that-- that what? That they consumed the wilderness for miles around in all directions? That they were 'effective' in getting a response of some kind? That they evoked, if not the beloved's voice, then at least the audible 'voice' of the flames?