Ghazal 27, Verse 5

{27,5}

hanuuz ma;hramii-e ;husn ko tarastaa huu;N
kare hai har bun-e muu kaam chashm-e biinaa kaa

1) now/still I long for intimacy with beauty

2a) every hair-root does the work of a seeing eye
2b) every hair-root has the desire/intention of a seeing eye

Notes:

tarasnaa : 'To long, be eagerly or anxiously desirous (of), to crave or desire earnestly and repeatedly, to beg (for), entreat, supplicate; to be tantalized'. (Platts p.318)

 

kare hai is an archaic form of kartii hai ; (GRAMMAR)

Nazm:

That is, although I see with the root of my every hair, I still don't obtain intimacy with beauty; that is, I don't obtain access to the One [God]. And the reason he says that the root of every hair acts as a seeing eye is that since everything is a mirror of the manifestation of the Creator, and if this is true of nature, then every hair-root is part of nature. That is, every hair-root is showing wisdom and artifice, the way that one sees through an eye. (29)

== Nazm page 29

Vajid:

Urdu text: Vajid 1902 {27}

Bekhud Dihlavi :

He says, although my every hair-root has become an eye, and in every sand-grain I am seeing her glories, nevertheless I haven't been able to attain to the level of intimacy with beauty. (57)

Bekhud Mohani:

The simile of the hair-root for an eye is a subtle/pleasing one. I don't understand why some friends have said that the reason for calling a hair-root an eye is that everything is a mirror for the expression of God's power, so this is also true of the hair-root. Why shouldn't it just be said that the hair-root and the eye have a manifest similarity [of roundness]? (71)

FWP:

SETS == HANUZ; MULTIVALENT WORD ( kaam )
EYES {3,1}

On the special, mystical power of the 'seeing eye' see {22,8}; coincidentally (?), {22,7} invokes 'every hair-root' in a related, though not identical, context.

Nazm and Bekhud Mohani suggest two foundations for the verse, and since they're not at all inconsistent we can enjoy them both.

The word kaam with its meanings both of 'work, action' and 'desire, intention' is also surely a key to the verse. (For more on such dual uses of kaam see {22,6}.) Does every hair-root do the work of an eye-- that is, does it see-- or does it only have the desire to possess, or even become, an eye? It's the difference between a successful performance, and a longing for performance. And since hanuuz can mean both 'now' and 'still, yet'-- for more on this see {3,4}-- it would be possible to construct various logical relationships.

Here is one prominent one: Since I have lots of hair-roots doing the work of seeing eyes, now I long for intimacy with beauty (because I can take full advantage of it). Or, alternatively: I still long for intimacy with beauty (despite all my failures to attain it)-- my every hair-root longs to be a seeing eye.

Is the 'hair-root as an eyeball' image grotesque? Not really, to my mind, because it's too hard for most of us to visualize the root of a hair, so the question of imaginatively trying to see it as an eyeball doesn't really arise. Nor does it in fact look much like an eyeball. Of course, the price of escaping a too-literal grotesquerie is a rather flat abstractness: the verse gives us no real physical collelatives at all for its imagery.