Ghazal 162, Verse 3

{162,3}

mai;N bhii mu;Nh me;N zabaan rakhtaa huu;N
kaash puuchho kih mudda((aa kyaa hai

1) even/also I have/keep a tongue in my mouth
2) if only you would ask,'What's your desire/intention?'

Notes:

mudda((aa : 'What is claimed, or alleged, or pretended, or meant; desire, wish; suit; meaning, object, view; scope, tenor, drift'. (Platts p.1015)

Ghalib:

[1865:] The light of my eyes, Mir Mahdi, and Mir Sarfaraz Husain, must probably be unhappy with me and must have a complaint against me, and must say, 'Look, you don't write us a letter!':

ham bhii mu;Nh me;N zabaan rakhte hai;N
kaash puuchho kih maajraa kyaa hai

[we too have a tongue in our mouth
if only you would ask, 'What's the situation?']

==Arshi p. 315
==Urdu text: Khaliq Anjum vol. 2, p. 543

Nazm:

From the word bhii the meaning emerges that if you ask the Others about their situation, the Lord has given me a tongue too-- ask me too, and find out. (174)

== Nazm page 174

Bekhud Dihlavi:

He says, you keep on asking the Others about their state. On me too God Most High has bestowed a tongue-- ask me too sometimes, 'what do you want?', and see what reply I give to this. (232)

Bekhud Mohani:

Anger and blame drip from this verse. (312)

FWP:

SETS == BHI; EXCLAMATION; KYA

Nazm points to bhii in its additive sense-- I 'too' have a tongue. The verse, however, leaves us to decide for ourselves on the comparison set. I 'too'-- like the Others? Like you, the beloved? Like human beings in general? This is certainly the more amusing meaning, since it has sarcastic (or ominous?) overtones and opens up richer narrative possibilities. But certainly bhii also contains the sense of 'even', which offers its own pleasure-- 'even' I have a tongue, though you might not have expected to find the power of speech in one so lowly and hapless.

Justin Ben-Hain observes (Apr. 2013): 'Perhaps on some level Ghalib was attuned to linguistics, for the first line uses four consecutive, labial syllables. Then zabaan breaks this repetition, enacting the line's statement that the mouth is not merely a pair of lips, but the vessel for the tongue/speech.'

The verse is exclamatory, but as usual, we have to decide for ourselves the tone in which it's exclaimed. Bekhud Mohani finds it dripping with anger and blame, which is certainly a possible tone. But it could be meek, helpless, wistful, so that the contrafactual expresses a mere utopian fantasy (if only she'd ask!-- but of course, quite naturally, she never will). Or it could be world-weary and sardonic (why let all these morons talk, when I could show them up with a word?).

And then in the second line, whose-- and what-- is the mudda((aa ? The commentators unhesitatingly assume that it's the lover's, but the word's range of meanings (see the definition above) certainly opens the possibility that it might be somebody else's intention, desire, claim, etc. that the lover wishes to explain or reveal. Most obviously, he could wish to reveal to the beloved the false, lustful ambitions of the Other(s). Even if it's his own intentions, he might have more to say than just a humble profession of his passion. Who knows-- maybe he wants to talk about the larger, mystical meaning of life, or say a few last (first?) words before going off into the desert.

As usual, the versatility is striking, and the colloquial energy is a delight. For an even cleverer use of the 'tongue in the mouth' image, see {138,5}.