Ghazal 191, Verse 1

{191,1}*

nuktah-chii;N hai ;Gam-e dil us ko sunaa))e nah bane
kyaa bane baat jahaa;N baat banaa))e nah bane

1) she's a nit-picker; the grief of the heart wouldn't be able to be narrated to her
2) how would a thing succeed, where a thing having been contrived/fabricated wouldn't {succeed / come into existence}?

Notes:

nuktah-chiin : 'Hypercritical; captious; —a captious critic, a caviller, carper'. (Platts p.1147)

 

baat ban'naa : 'To be successful, prove a success, answer well; to gain credit or honour, to prosper, flourish'. (Platts p.117)

 

baat banaanaa : 'To talk much; to make up a story; to invent excuses, to concoct, fabricate; to talk grandly, to boast'. (Platts p.117)

Ghalib:

[1862:] [In a letter, Ghalib quotes {191:1, 2, 5, 8, 4, 9}. For more on the letter, see {161,1}.]

Nazm:

baat kaa ban'naa and ban pa;Rnaa are in the sense of 'for devices/strategems to succeed'; and baat kaa banaanaa is in the sense of 'twisting and turning a matter in order to cause one's purpose to succeed'. He says, she's such a nit-picker that I would want a hundred thousand times to contrive to recount to her the sorrow of my heart-- she realizes this, and cuts me off. (214)

== Nazm page 214

Bekhud Dihlavi:

He says, that mischievous one is a nit-picker. To narrate to her the grief of the heart-- it just doesn't happen. That is, she will seize on every single word, and then add an objection.... baat banaanii means 'to tell a lie'. The meaning is, because of ner nit-picking our lie will become apparent to her, and the thing will be spoiled. (273)

Bekhud Mohani :

baat ban'naa = for a desire to be accomplished. baat banaanaa = to express one's purpose. The beloved is a nit-picker-- she objects to every single word. To narrate to her the grief of the heart is not an easy task, nor does it yield any result. In such a place, where even expressing one's purpose would not cause a desire to be accomplished, what hope can there be? (374)

FWP:

SETS == IDIOMS; REPETITION
SOUND EFFECTS: {26,7}
SPEAKING: {14,4}

Here's a well-known and very popular ghazal. Because of its refrain, the whole ghazal is greatly shaped by idiomatic expressions involving baat ban'naa , often with the baat colloquially omitted (for another example of the same idiom, see {70,3}. This particular verse also features the especially suitable baat banaanaa (see the definition above), made from the transitive form of the same verb. In addition, the second line of the verse cleverly integrates baat banaanaa into another common idiomatic pattern displayed in banaa))e nah bane ; for discussion of this structure, see {191,8}.

The result is a classic second line with almost tongue-twisting sound effects, a wonderfully circular feeling when you recite it, and a kind of radical untranslatability. The framing structure kyaa bane baat jahaa;N baat ... nah bane [how would a thing succeed, where a thing wouldn't succeed?] can hardly fail to be present in your ear and mind, interrupted only by banaa))e , which itself works, in terms of both sound and idiomatic meaning, as a kind of embellishment of the theme.

What exactly is the problem being expressed in this inshaa))iyah second line? The beloved is a nit-picker, so you can't get anywhere when you talk to her and try to tell her the 'grief of the heart'. But the precise involvement of falsehood versus truth remains undecideable.

=she's a nit-picker-- thus she detects and unravels the grandiose falsehoods with which I try to impress her, so that my situation is hopeless

=she's a nit-picker to such a degree that not even carefully framed fancy falsehoods would impress her, so what hope is there for a helplessly truthful, inarticulate, suffering lover like me?

=she's a nit-picker about style, and only enjoys fancy rhetoric and floridly embellished verbiage-- and even that doesn't ultimately succeed with her, so what hope can any lover have?

Ajit Sanzgiri has suggested that the 'nit-picker' can be the 'grief of the heart' itself-- it is strict and scrupulous, and refuses to be embellished or rhetorically dressed up in any way, even to please the beloved. I think this is possible, but not as persuasive as the primary reading, since personifying the 'grief of the heart' is not very common in itself-- much less envisioning it as a 'nit-picker' (which is the obvious and perfect behavior for the beloved). But who can say that this reading too doesn't hover at the edges of the main meaning, especially in view of the positioning and grammar of the first half of the first line?

This one is really a verse of convoluted idiomatic wordplay, and its great charm is the astonishing second line. The following verse, {191,2}, has a similar structure.