Ghazal 198, Verse 1

{198,1}

ham rashk ko apne bhii gavaaraa nahii;N karte
marte hai;N vale un kii tamannaa nahii;N karte

1) we don't approve of envy/jealousy, not even/also our own
2) we die, but we don't {long for her / 'do her longing'}

Notes:

Nazm:

That is, the way avarice for one's own wealth is the extreme of avarice and deprivation, so the same is true of the extreme of envy/jealousy: when we feel a longing for union, we ourself become jealous of ourself. (222)

== Nazm page 222

Bekhud Dihlavi:

He says, in passion for her, we've come to feel envy/jealousy even over ourself. Thus we've accepted the sacrifice of our life, but we've given up longing for her. That is, if we long, then she will come or will call us there, and in both those situations my eyes will see her, and we'll feel envious; our hands will touch her hands, we'll burn with envy; our feel will fall on the earth of her street; we'll be jealous. Thus we've left off longing for her. (288)

Bekhud Mohani:

We have so much envy/jealousy that not to speak of the Rival, it doesn't even please us that we ourself would long for her. Although we're dying, we don't long to meet with her, (390)

Faruqi:

[See his comments on Mir's M{217,5}.]

FWP:

SETS
INDEPENDENCE: {9,1}

Bekhud Dihlavi labels this not a ghazal but a verse-set, but he seems to be alone among the commentators in taking that view.

The commentators unite to provide one reading, which is basically that of {153,1}; thus in its intensely paradoxical way this reading makes perfect Ghalibian sense, and is certainly the primary one. But notice that {153,1} also makes heavy use of wordplay: without the clever triple use of dekhnaa , its enjoyableness would be much diminished.

The same clever use of wordplay energizes the present verse as well, in a subtle but thus all the more amusing way. If we don't approve of envy, including our own, then we're speaking in what might almost pass as a Ghalibian mainstream: this verse is part of the set that I call 'independence' verses (for more on these verses, see {9,1}).

And notice what the result of our rejection of envy is: in the second line, we repudiate all interest in something that belongs or pertains to somebody else: we reject, literally, 'her longing' [un kii tamannaa]. Since we radically disapprove of all envy, why should we envy or covet something that's so clearly hers-- her very own longing? Of course, this is a secondary reading, a kind of artefact, since kisii kii tamannaa karnaa is a perfectly normal way to describe one's longing for someone. But the discussion of 'our own envy' in the first line tends to activate the apparent contrast of 'her longing' in the second. For more on this ambiguity of the possessive, see {41,6}. For more on the complexities of rashk , see {53,4}.)

In short, I'm suggesting a parallel with {197,2} and so many other Ghalibian verses, in which the overt meaning and the wordplay interact in complex and doubly enjoyable ways.