Ghazal 206, Verse 3

{206,3}

bah pech-o-taab-e havas silk-e ((aafiyat mat to;R
nigaah-e ((ajz sar-e rishtah-e salaamat hai

1) with the twisting and turning of desire/lust/ambition, don't tear/break the thread/course of health/safety

2a) a gaze of weakness/submission is the end/origin of the thread/connection of safety/health
2b) the end/origin of the thread/connection of safety/health is a gaze of weakness/submission

Notes:

pech-o-taab : 'Twisting and twining; convolution, twisting knots, folds; contortions; restlessness, anxiety, agitation, perplexity, disquietude, distraction, distress; vexation, anger, indignation'. (Platts p.297)

 

havas : 'Desire, lust, concupiscence, inordinate appetite; --ambition; --curiosity'. (Platts p.1241)

 

silk : 'Thread, string; order, series, train; course, tenor; road, way'. (Platts p.670)

 

((aafiyat : 'Health, soundness; safety, security; well-being, welfare, freedom from evil or discomfort &c.; success, prosperity'. (Platts p.757)

 

((ajz : 'Powerlessness, impotence, weakness, helplessness, submission, wretchedness'. (Platts p.759)

 

sar : 'Head, top, pinnacle, tip, end, point; front, face; origin, beginning; head, chief; intention, end, aim; inclination, aim, desire, will'. (Platts p.648)

 

rishtah : 'Thread, string, line; series; connexion, relationship, kin; relation by blood or marriage; alliance, affinity'. (Platts p.593)

 

salaamat : 'Safety, salvation; tranquillity, peace, rest, repose; immunity; liberty; soundness; recovery; health'. (Platts p.668)

Nazm:

Health/welfare is a thread, for which desire/lust is a twist and a tangle from which there's the fear of the thread's breaking. That is, desire/lust comes to a man, and health/welfare goes. And a gaze of weakness/submission-- that is, reunuciation of desire/lust-- is the thread/connection of wellbeing. (233)

== Nazm page 233

Bekhud Dihlavi:

The meaning is that through desire/lust, comfort and health/safety in both worlds are destroyed. (291)

Bekhud Mohani:

The means for the obtaining of health/safety is humility [;xaaksaarii]. The difference between the two lines has emerged as: if you want peace and repose, then adopt contentment [qanaa((at] and flee from desire/lust. And if you want safety/health, then abandon pride and adopt humility. (413)

FWP:

SETS == A,B; GENERATORS; WORDPLAY

This is a maddeningly difficult verse to pin down, and obviously Ghalib made it that way on purpose. The first question is one that only Bekhud Mohani realizes the need for asking: what is the relationship between the two lines? Do they mean to give the same basic advice, in slightly paraphrased forms, so that they're like two parallel moral maxims? In favor of this possibility, we can notice that ((aafiyat and salaamat are almost synonyms (see the definitions above) , and that both of these qualities are available by means of a 'thread' to which we're urged to pay attention.

Or are the two lines not parallel-- is one situation a mere secondary illustration or 'proof' of the other, or do they stand in some other relationship? Since the first line is an imperative, it might be considered the urgent message of the verse, while the second would provide a reason for obeying the command. Or the abstract, general maxim offered in the second line might be taken as the main point, with the first line a mere behavioral extrapolation from it. As usual, we have to decide all such questions for ourselves.

And above all, what's the tone of the verse? Here's where all that carefully ambiguous vocabulary comes in. In the first line, pech-o-taab can mean anything from the physical ('convolution') through the helplessly suffering ('anxiety, distress') to the actively purposeful ('anger, indignation'). And havas can mean almost any kind of 'desire', from 'lust' through 'ambition' to 'curiosity': it's true that havas often has a negative valuation, as in {138,4}; but sometimes it can be apparently morally neutral, as in {21,1} or {123,9}; or even clearly positive, as in {112,6}.

Since the lover is never in the realm of worldly well-being or ((aafiyat anyway, prudential admonitions ('don't upset the applecart, don't rock the boat') from the Advisor would hardly commend themselves. The first line might well be the kind of worldly, cynical injunction the Advisor might deliver-- the kind that the lover knows in his bones that he is destined to go out and violate immediately. Perhaps, indeed, he's only saying the lines by way of mockery.

And similarly, what's the tone in the second line? The world salaamat has the same sense of all-purpose (worldly) well-being as does ((aafiyat , and thus invites us-- as it surely does the lover too-- to rebellion. For if the way to achieve such salaamat is to constantly and prudently display a 'gaze of powerlessness / impotence / weakness / helplessness / submission / wretchedness', then what kind of salaamat can it really be? Either the gazer would really be wretched, and thus wouldn't enjoy any kind of 'well-being' at all, or else he would be faking it, offering a great show of hypocritical humility in order to get certain worldly advantages-- just as the Advisor would instinctively do and the lover would instinctively not do.

In short, I defy anybody to genuinely pin down the tone of this verse. It's radically elusive. Is it a counsel of despair offered by the broken-down lover to himself? A cynical trick urged by the Advisor? A genuine moral maxim about Sufistic resignation and contentment and humility? A simple report, from some worldly person who's been-there-done-that and is telling us the best way to make it through life?

Whatever the tone may be, the wordplay is terrific. The beautifully-deployed thread imagery includes pech-o-taab , silk , to;Rnaa , sar , rishtah . And to see how the (long, narrow, straight) 'gaze' too ties into (sorry, sorry!) the complex of thread imagery, compare the magnificent {10,12}.