Ghazal 229, Verse 3

{229,3}*

phuu;Nkaa hai kis ne gosh-e mu;habbat me;N ay ;xudaa
afsuun-e inti:zaar tamannaa kahe;N jise

1) who has blown/breathed in the ear of love, oh Lord,
2) the incantation of waiting/expectation, which they would call 'longing'?

Notes:

phuu;Nknaa : 'To blow, blow on (with the breath); ... to blow or breathe a charm or incantation'. (Platts p.293)

 

afsuun : 'Incantation, charm, spell, verses used in spells or enchantments, fascination, sorcery, witchcraft'. (Platts p.62)

 

inti:zaar : 'Expecting, waiting (anxiously); looking out; expectation; expectancy'. (Platts p.87)

 

tamannaa : 'Wish, desire, longing, inclination... ; request, prayer, supplication, petition'. (Platts p.337)

Nazm:

The astonishment is over this: the moment love appears, how has longing been produced, and how did the incantation of waiting take effect? By the interrogative is meant not a real inquiry, but rather an expression of surprise or wonder. (258)

== Nazm page 258

Bekhud Dihlavi:

He says, oh Lord, who has blown into the ear of love such an incantation of waiting, which they call 'longing'? It is surprising that the moment love appears, longing too is produced. (314)

Bekhud Mohani:

Through the address to the Lord, a subtle point is that he wants to say to the Lord, all these are the wonders of your power alone.... the point is also that outwardly no one considers you to be the cause of this action. But we understand very well that you alone are behind the veil/curtain. (471)

FWP:

SETS == DEFINITION

One way to create an enchantment is to recite the magically efficacious words, and to blow them with the same breath, even as they are recited, into the ear of the enchantee; or else over some medium, like a bowl of water, that would then receive and transmit the enchantment when someone consumed it. The life-restoring effect of the breath of Jesus, when he blows on someone, is only superficially similar, since he uses Divine power rather than magic.

Magic itself is, strictly speaking, forbidden to good Muslims, but there's a very wide folkloric and narrative grey area in which figures like Hazrat Khizr move with dexterity and ease. The whole dastan tradition, including the vast Hamzah cycle, is overwhelmingly full of all sorts of magic, both the illicit kinds created by evil magicians, and the acceptable 'white' kinds that are taken to be sponsored in some vague or indirect manner by divine powers or representatives.

So this verse should be taken as a kind of neutral question, not implying on the face of it any special accusation of evil. As Bekhud Mohani notes, the address to the Lord may imply that he is considered ultimately responsible; or, of course, it may just be the usual exclamation, 'oh lord!' or 'oh God!'. The inshaa))iyah structure of the verse leaves the interpretive possibilities as open as possible.

Another question raised by the verse might be called a definitional one. The verse asks about the source of the 'incantation of waiting' that 'they'-- unspecified, and therefore to be taken as 'people in general'-- would call 'longing'. This might be just a clever way of providing a (quasi-)definition of 'longing': what people take to be a human emotion is really the result of a magic spell.

But the verse also leaves open the possibility that the people who identify this 'incantation of waiting' as 'longing' are wrong. It might not really be the nature of longing that's at issue, but rather the erroneous judgments made by those who view such emotions from the outside, by 'people in general'. They think that there exists a spontaneous human emotion called 'longing' that is generated by lovers from their own hearts. But in fact what they are seeing is the operation of an irresistible magic spell, such that the poor lovers are really victims of enchantment, frozen into attitudes of perpetual 'waiting', like Sleeping Beauty in the English fairy-tale tradition.