
Does Self-Representation in a Criminal
Case Ever Make Sense?
From the Nolo.com Criminal Law Center
Not usually, but here's a discussion of the few
situations in which you might consider representing yourself in a criminal
case.
Defendants may choose to represent themselves for a variety of reasons:
- Some defendants can afford to hire a lawyer, but don't do so because
they think the likely punishment is not severe enough to justify the
expense.
- Some defendants believe (often mistakenly) that an attorney who represented
them previously was not competent, and figure they can do just as well
on their own.
- Some defendants believe that lawyers are part of an overall oppressive
system and seek to make a political statement by representing themselves.
- Some defendants want to take responsibility for their own destiny.
- Some defendants who are in jail awaiting trial can gain privileges
through self-representation, such as access to the jail's law library.
- Self-represented defendants are not bound by lawyers' ethical codes.
This means that a defendant who represents himself can delay proceedings
and sometimes wreak havoc on an already overloaded system by repeatedly
filing motions. However, this approach is not recommended, since it
can be counted upon to backfire.
While it's not usually a good idea for criminal defendant to represent
himself
, it may make sense in some situations. The most obvious rule is that
the less severe the charged crime, the more reasonable it is for a defendant
to self-represent. For example, defendants charged with minor traffic
offenses, shoplifting or simple assault (a fight) may get by without hiring
an attorney, while defendants charged with felonies should rarely be without
one. The most difficult situations involve misdemeanors, such as drunk
driving or a repeat offense that, upon conviction, can easily result in
at least some incarceration. Hiring an attorney in these situations may
make sense because jail time and a fine are possibilities, and convictions
may carry hidden costs (such as more severe punishment for yet another
conviction at a later time, or vastly increased insurance rates). On the
other hand, first-time offenders charged with non-violent crimes are not
usually sentenced to jail, and judges and prosecutors often offer standard
deals to all defendants, whether or not they are represented by an attorney.
Thus, the most critical piece of information that defendants should try
to learn is before deciding whether to hire an attorney is what the punishment
is likely to be if they are convicted, both immediately and in the future
(if the defendant is arrested or convicted for a similar crime).
| How To Find Out What
The Punishment Is Likely to Be |
|
It can be difficult to learn about judges' common sentencing
practices. Typical sentences aren't usually listed in statutes
or court rules (although sentencing in federal court is
a big exception). However, some states do have what are
called determinate sentencing laws. These laws provide specific
sentences for specific types of offenses -- allowing the
judge to add or subtract a year or two in either direction
depending on the circumstances. Other states have indeterminate
sentencing laws, which allow the judge to sentence an offender
for a period of time between a minimum sentence and a maximum
sentence -- for instance between two and ten years. The
person will be released when a parole board agrees to the
release.
If a defendant wants to find out what his or her punishment
is likely to be if he or she is convicted, the defendant
might take the following steps:
- Pay a private defense attorney for an hour of consultation.
An experienced defense attorney can often make accurate
predictions as to likely punishment.
- Ask a relative or close friend who is or who knows an
attorney for informal, unpaid advice.
- Talk to an attorney from the public defender's office.
|
|
Self-Representation at the Arraignment
In most criminal courts the arraignment is where the defendant first appears
before a judge and enters a plea of guilty or not guilty to the offense
charged. Assuming the defendant plans to enter a plea of not guilty, which
almost every defendant does at this early stage, the court will then:
- set a date for the next procedural event in the case
- consider any bail requests the defendant or the prosecutor makes (usually
if the defendant is at liberty at the arraignment, the defendant will
continue at liberty without a change in bail status)
- appoint a lawyer for the defendant upon the defendant's request and
a showing of eligibility, and
- ask the defendant (or the defendant's lawyer if he or she is represented)
to "waive time" (that is, give up the defendant's right to
have the trial or other statutory proceedings occur within specified
periods of time).
Most people can handle an arraignment without a lawyer. However, if the
defendant can get the court to appoint a lawyer for him or her without
having to delay the arraignment, or the defendant is able to arrange for
private representation before the arraignment, having a lawyer at this
stage is always better.
Self-Representation with the Help of a Legal Coach
Defendants who choose to represent themselves are wise to seek an attorney
willing to serve as a "legal coach." The goal of hiring a legal
coach is to combine a lawyer's knowledge with the defendant's own time.
Because the defendant pays for the lawyer's help only occasionally, the
cost of a legal coach can be far less than turning the entire case over
to a private attorney.
Not all attorneys are willing to serve as legal coaches. Some are worried
about their liability if they give wrong advice based on incomplete information;
others do not want to be involved with a case unless they are in control
of it. Thus, if a defendant is considering going it alone and thinks he
or she will want a lawyer's help, the defendant should, if possible, get
the earliest possible start to lining one up.
Click
here for related information and products from Nolo.com.
|