DEMENTIA
Miriam Rabkin, M.D.
The dementias are a group of disorders involving multiple cognitive
defects and the general loss of intellectual ability. Blancard’s 1726
definition, “extinction of the imagination and judgment,”[i]
has been expanded into more formal diagnostic criteria, such as those of the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association (Table
1), which emphasize the presence of memory loss, impairment in abstract thought,
language, praxis or recognition, and disturbance of previous social or
occupational functioning. Dementia is a prevalent problem, afflicting
approximately 10 percent of 65-year olds and at least 40 percent of those over
85.[ii]
While there are more than 60 different causes of dementia,[iii]
this chapter will focus on the most common. Internists are often responsible for
the diagnosis and care of persons with dementia, and it is important for them to
recognize that management of such patients is improved with a “team”
approach, utilizing occasional neurologic and psychiatric consultation,
intensive social work and nursing care and the close involvement of family
members.
Table 1: DSM IV criteria for dementia
|
·
A.
The development of multiple cognitive deficits manifested by both:
1) Memory impairment (impaired
ability to learn new information or to recall previously learned
information);
2) One (or more) of the following cognitive disturbances:
a) aphasia (language disturbance)
b) apraxia (impaired ability to carry out motor activities despite
intact motor function)
c) agnosia (failure to recognize or identify objects despite intact
sensory function)
d) disturbance in executive functioning (i.e., planning,
organizing, sequencing, abstracting) |
|
·
B.
The cognitive deficits in criteria A1 and A2 each cause significant
impairment in social or occupational functioning and represent a
significant decline from a previous level of functioning |
|
·
C.
Not occurring exclusively during the course of delirium |
|
·
D.
Either (1) or (2): ·
There
is evidence from the history, physical examination or laboratory tests of
a specific organic factor (or
factors) judged to be etiologically related to the disturbance. ·
In the
absence of such evidence, an etiologic organic factor can be presumed if
the disturbance cannot be accounted for by any non-organic mental disorder
(e.g., major depression accounting for cognitive impairment) |
Reprinted and
modified from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed,
APA 1994.
Diagnosis
Patients and their families are often the first to note signs of dementia
and “informant questionnaires” may be as diagnostically accurate as brief
cognitive tests.[iv]
Frequent early complaints involve changes in level of functioning, and common
early symptoms include forgetting names and conversations, inability to manage
finances and difficulty learning new skills. Behavioral changes such as
personality change and agitation may also be evident. Overt dementia may be
preceded by a three to five year period of mild but significant cognitive
impairment in which subtle changes in cognition may be difficult to distinguish
from the normal changes of aging. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been
studied in a national cohort of patients; 40 to 50 percent of patients
progressed to Alzheimer’s disease within four years.
Symptoms
that may indicate dementia are summarized in Table 2; the presence of any of
these should trigger an assessment. Once the presence of dementia is suspected,
history and physical exam should focus on four areas: determining if cognitive
impairment is present, excluding delirium and depression, establishing the most
likely cause of dementia and deciding if it is treatable or reversible.
Table 2: Symptoms that may indicate dementia
|
Does the
person have increased difficulty with any of the activities listed below? |
|
·
Learning and retaining new
information ·
is repetitive; has trouble
remembering recent conversations, events, appointments, frequently
misplaces objects |
|
·
Handling complex tasks ·
has trouble following a complex train
of thought or performing tasks that require many steps, such as balancing
a checkbook or cooking a meal |
|
·
Reasoning ability ·
is unable to respond with a
reasonable plan to problems at work or at home, such as knowing what to do
if the bathroom is flooded; shows uncharacteristic disregard for rules of
social conduct |
|
·
Spatial ability and
orientation ·
has trouble driving, organizing
objects around the house, finding his or her way around familiar places |
|
·
Language ·
has increasing difficulty with
finding the words to express what he or she wants to say and with
following conversations |
|
·
Behavior ·
Appears more passive and less
responsive; is more irritable that usual; is more suspicious than usual;
misinterprets visual or auditory stimuli |
|
In
addition to failure to arrive at the right time for appointments, the
clinician can look for difficulty discussing current events in an area of
interest and changes in behavior or dress. It may also be helpful to
follow up on an area of concern by asking the patient or family members
relevant questions |
Reprinted and
modified from source 10.
(1) Is cognitive impairment present?
While some patients are obviously forgetful or disoriented, the presence
of memory deficits may be subtle. An efficient, well-validated diagnostic tool
is the Mini Mental State exam (appendix A), which takes five to ten minutes to
perform in the office. A score of less than 24 points is 87 percent sensitive
and 82 percent specific for dementia or delirium; conversely, a score of 26 or
higher virtually excludes dementia. Other simple questions can be extremely
helpful - a 1991 review by Siu[v]
found that disorientation to day of the week has a high positive predictive
value for the presence of dementia and ability to subtract serial sevens to 79
has a high negative predictive value. Patients with early dementia may have
difficulty with prompted recall (remembering the president’s name) and with
recognition (recognizing the president’s name). Of obvious importance is the
need to take a patient’s level of education, hearing, vision and fluency in
English into consideration when assessing cognitive ability. Providers also need
to remember that short office-based screening instruments are unlikely to detect
mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
(2) Is the patient delirious or depressed?
As the DSM IV criteria indicate, the diagnosis of dementia should not be
made in the presence of delirium or depression and these diagnoses should be
carefully excluded in patients with new cognitive deficits. Both dementia and
delirium can present with intellectual impairment, and both are common in older
patients. Clues to the presence of delirium are rapid progression (over hours to
days), reduced attention, incoherent speech, a fluctuating level of
consciousness and a waxing and waning course.
Depression and delirium are often mistaken for one another in elderly
patients. Distinguishing the two is complicated by the fact that they can
co-exist, that dementia can present as mood disturbance in the absence of
significant memory deficits, and that depression can (infrequently) present as
dementia or “depression-related cognitive dysfunction”.[vi]
A careful clinical interview can be supplemented by using a self-report
screening instrument such as the Geriatric Depression Scale, and psychiatric
consultation can be extremely useful.
(3) What is the most likely cause of dementia?
The most common etiologies of dementia are Alzheimer’s disease (AD),
cerebrovascular disease and Parkinson’s disease (PD), accounting for
approximately 60 percent, 10 percent and 3 percent of patients in clinical
series respectively. Critical elements in distinguishing these from each other
and from rarer causes include the history, mental status exam, physical exam and
laboratory testing.
HISTORY:
It
is impossible to overstate the importance of a detailed history in the
evaluation of patients with dementia. Patients should be carefully
interviewed in the language in which they are most fluent, and family members
and caregivers surveyed for parallel history. In addition to focusing on aspects
of the history which might implicate delirium and depression, specific issues
that should be addressed include:
(1) Time course: Did the symptoms begin abruptly or gradually? How quickly have they progressed? Alzheimer’s disease typically presents insidiously with subtle defects of short term memory and progresses gradually. Abrupt onset or rapid progression points to another diagnosis - such as delirium.
(2)
Associated
illness: Did symptoms present in the context
of another medical disorder? Is there a diagnosis of systemic disease such as
vasculitis, sarcoid, TB, SLE or diabetes? Has the patient suffered seizures?
Strokes? Head trauma? A history of CVA implies that dementia is caused by
cerebrovascular disease, but a recent study demonstrated that the presence of
brain infarction increases the likelihood that patients with pathologic evidence
of Alzheimer’s disease will be symptomatic.[vii]
(3) Medications and alcohol use: As discussed below, these are among the most common causes of reversible dementia.
(4)
Dietary
history: Is there a reason to suspect vitamin
deficiency? In a 1988 series of 141 consecutive patients with neuropsychiatric
symptoms due to cobalamin deficiency, Lindenbaum et al. found that 28 percent
had neither anemia nor macrocytosis.[viii]
(5)
Occupational
history: Has the patient been exposed to heavy
metals?
(6) Social history: In addition to information about alcohol and drug use, patients should be asked about history of syphilis and risk factors for HIV infection. Physicians should have a clear and concrete sense of a patient’s ability to perform the activities of daily living, a key to planning care.
(7)
Family
history: Early onset Alzheimer’s disease is
clearly inherited, as are Huntington’s disease, several rare metabolic
disorders such as Wilson’s disease and mitochondrial and lysosomal disorders.
MENTAL STATUS TESTING:
There are many well-validated tools used for cognitive testing. The goal
of testing is to demonstrate a decline in intellectual function, to assess if
depression may be a contributing factor, to make predictions about future
functioning and to plan care. The Mini Mental Status Exam and the Geriatric
Depression scale are easily administered by primary caregivers and should be
performed on all patients with dementia. More detailed evaluation, such as the
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS), the Blessed
Information-Memory-Concentration test, visuospatial testing and the Boston
Diagnostic Aphasia Evaluation may also be helpful in making a diagnosis.
Neuropsychiatric evaluation of this type can be performed at the Memory
Disorders Clinic and should be considered if a patient’s presentation is
atypical, a diagnosis is elusive or if dementia occurs before the age of 55.
PHYSICAL EXAM:
In addition to the history and mental status examination, a targeted
physical exam should be performed on all patients with dementia. Signs of
systemic disorders such as vasculitis, SLE, sarcoid, TB and hypothyroidism
suggest further tailored evaluation is needed. Careful neurologic examination
should include observation of gait and posture, cranial nerves, motor strength,
sensation and reflexes:
(1)
Gait and posture: Stooped posture and shuffling gait are characteristic
of Parkinson’s disease. A “magnetic” gait in a patient with dementia and
incontinence should trigger suspicion of NPH. Patients with a broad-based gait
and difficulty turning may have cerebellar dysfunction or posterior column
disease (such as cobalamin deficiency). Bradykinesia and abnormal gait are seen
late in the course of Alzheimer’s disease, if at all.
(2)
Cranial nerves: Focal abnormalities suggest cerebrovascular disease.
(3)
Motor strength: Focal abnormalities again suggest cerebrovascular
disease. Rigidity and cogwheeling are typical symptoms of Parkinson’s disease.
(4)
Sensation: Peripheral neuropathy may be a clue to the presence of
cobalamin deficiency, although it is also present in other unrelated disorders
such as diabetes.
(5)
Reflexes: As well as looking for focal deficits and the delayed reflexes
of hypothyroidism, examiners should test the more primitive “release”
reflexes such as snout, glabellar, rooting and sucking which are more commonly
found in neurodegenerative disorders. The presence of asterixis obviously points
towards hepatic encephalopathy.
LABORATORY TESTING:
Further evaluation of the patient with dementia is a matter of some
debate. Extensive evaluation, including lumbar puncture, was once standard
practice. In 1987, a National Institutes of Health Consensus Conference
recommended that all patients with dementia have a CBC, electrolyte panel,
screening metabolic panel, thyroid function tests, vitamin B12 and folate
levels, syphilis serology, urinalysis, electrocardiogram and chest Xray.[ix] Subsequent studies
indicate that this list may be excessive, and the American Academy of Neurology
practice parameters published in 1994[x]
suggest that routine evaluation of the demented patient include:
(1) CBC
(2) serum electrolytes,
including calcium
(3) glucose
(4) BUN/creatinine
(5) liver function tests
(6) thyroid function tests
(7) vitamin B12 level
(8) syphilis serology
The 1996
Clinical Practice Guideline on dementia published by the Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research makes no specific recommendations about serologic
evaluation, other than to refer to the American Academy of Neurology guidelines
mentioned above and to caution that “a laboratory test should not be used as a
screening procedure or as part of the initial assessment. Laboratory tests
should be conducted only after (a) it has been established that the patient has
impairments consistent with those used in this guideline (i.e. in multiple
domains, not lifelong, representing a decline from a previous level); (b)
delirium and depression have been excluded; (c) confounding factors such as
educational level have been considered; and (d) it is relevant to rule out a
medical condition.”[xi]
In selected patients, further investigation is appropriate. Indications
for lumbar puncture include suspicion of infection or vasculitis, positive
syphilis serology, the presence of metastatic cancer, rapidly progressive
dementia or dementia in a patient under the age of 55. Neuroimaging is indicated
in patients with focal neurologic deficits, seizures, prominent gait
disturbance, a history of head trauma or dementia at an early age. Risk factors
for HIV should prompt serologic testing regardless of age.
Several new diagnostic tests for AD have recently emerged. The best
studied is the use of ApoE genotyping as a diagnostic
(not screening) test.[xii]
A 1998 report by Mayeux et al.[xiii]
based on over 2,000 autopsied patients with dementia, examined the incremental
diagnostic yield of knowing if patients had one or more E4 alleles. Clinical
probabilities of having Alzheimer’s disease as the specific cause of dementia
were computed based on age, sex, and a clinical assessment that included routine
blood tests to exclude reversible causes of dementia and head imaging. Knowing
the ApoE genotype improved the area under the ROC curve by about eight percent,
mainly by reducing the false positive rate. The diagnostic strategy of clinical
assessment followed by ApoE genotyping could not exclude other causes of
dementia in a small number of subjects (about four percent in this study). Very
few African-Americans or other minorities were in this study. The utility of
ApoE genotyping in routine clinical practice will depend on the ability of the
clinician to generate Bayesian probabilities, will require knowledge of pre- and
post-testing genetic counseling, and should be preceded by evidence showing that
a specific diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, rather than a strategy of
excluding reversible causes of dementia, benefits patients, the health care
system, or both. While it is likely that this test will become part of the
accepted assessment of demented patients, based on these considerations, we do
not recommend its use at this time.
(4) Is there a potentially reversible cause of
dementia?
When discussing dementia, the terms “treatable” and “reversible”
are not interchangeable. While there is no curative therapy for most forms of
dementia, such as Alzheimer’s disease, many symptoms are treatable and
intervention can greatly improve quality of life. A potentially reversible
dementia, however, is one in which a patient’s baseline intellectual function
can be restored. It is critically important to consider reversible causes when
evaluating a patient with dementia. However, clinicians should be aware that
even if potentially reversible dementias exist, treatment may not be effective.
In series of patients with dementia, potentially reversible causes are found in
fewer than 20 percent. The most common of these are drug toxicity, alcohol abuse
and depression. In one of the few papers to address follow-up after treatment,
Clarfield analyzed 32 studies including 2889 patients and found that 13 percent
had potentially reversible dementias but only 11 percent improved with treatment
and only 3 percent had complete reversal.[xiv]
The list of disorders causing potentially reversible dementia is
extremely long (Table 3), raising the spectre of extensive and invasive
evaluation of every patient with dementia. This is a low yield approach.
Instead, careful attention should be paid to the history, remembering that it is
often extremely useful to obtain history from caregivers as well as patients.
Patients should bring all their medications to clinic (including all
nonprescription drugs, supplements and vitamins). Many routinely prescribed
medicines such as antihypertensives, H2-blockers and nonsteroidals can affect
cognition in elderly patients, and polypharmacy is a particular concern.[xv]
Appendix B reviews some of the medications that are known to cause cognitive
impairment. Alcoholism among the elderly is increasingly common, and alcohol use
should be reviewed.
After medication side effects, alcohol use and depression, normal
pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), metabolic disorders, hypothyroidism, neoplasm and
trauma are less frequent etiologies of potentially reversible dementia. As noted
above, recommendations for routine laboratory testing usually include thyroid
function tests, syphilis serology and B12 levels.
Table 3: Causes of potentially reversible dementia
|
Neoplasms Gliomas Meningiomas Metastatic
tumors (carcinoma,
lymphoma, leukemia) Paraneoplastic
effects Nutritional
disorders Thiamine deficiency (Wernicke’s
encephalopathy, Wernicke-Korsakoff
syndrome) B12 deficiency (pernicious anemia) Vitamin B6 deficiency (pellagra) |
Metabolic
disorders Thyroid
disease (hyper- and hypo-) Hypoglycemia Hypernatremia,
hyponatremia Hypercalcemia Renal
failure Hepatic
failure Cushing’s
disease, Addison’s disease Hypopituitarism Wilson’s
disease Trauma Craniocerebral
trauma Acute and
chronic subdural hematoma |
Infections Bacterial
meningitis/encephalitis Parasitic
meningitis/encephalitis Fungal
meningitis/encephalitis
Cryptococcus Viral
meningitis/encephalitis Brain
abscess TB
meningitis Neurosyphilis |
|
Drugs Antidepressants Antianxiety
agents Hypnotics Sedatives Antiarrhythmics Antihypertensives Anticonvulsants Cardiac medications (including
digitalis and its derivatives) Drugs with anticholinergic effects |
Psychiatric
disorders Depression Schizophrenia Other
psychosis Toxins Alcoholism Heavy
metals (lead, mercury, arsenic) Organic poisons (including solvents
and insecticides) |
Autoimmune
disorders CNS
vasculitis Temporal
arteritis SLE Multiple
sclerosis Other disorders Normal
pressure hydrocephalus Whipple’s
disease Sarcoidosis |
Reprinted
and modified from source 10.
Treatment
Treatment of dementia falls into two categories, cognitive and
behavioral. Clearly, attempting to slow the progress of dementia will vary
depending on diagnosis. Treatment of symptoms such as agitation, aggression,
depression and incontinence, however, is similar no matter the underlying cause.
As we learn more about Alzheimer’s disease, there is increasing interest in
the possibilities of primary prevention. Diet and estrogen use are under intense
scrutiny – and trials are ongoing - but data are not conclusive. At present,
experts believe that there are no modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer’s
disease.[xvi]
(1) Treatment of dementing diseases:
ALZHEIMER’S
DISEASE:
FDA-approved drug therapy for the treatment of the cognitive impairment
of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) consists of hydergine, tacrine (CognexTM)
and donepezil (AriceptTM). Hydergine was initially conceptualized as
a cerebral vasodilator, although this has subsequently been disproved; it does
not appear to improve cognitive ability but instead may cause mild improvement
in mood in those demented patients who are depressed. Tacrine and donepezil are
central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors whose effects appear to be limited; they
are best understood as weak palliative agents for AD.
Although a 1986 trial[xvii]
reported dramatic improvements in patients with AD treated with tacrine, result
of this magnitude have not been reproduced, and the methods used in that study
have been formally criticized by the FDA.[xviii]
Five subsequent trials, including a 30-week randomized controlled trial in
healthy patients with mild to moderate AD,[xix]
have demonstrated slight improvements in cognitive function which disappear as
soon as the drug is stopped.[xx]
The half-life of tacrine is two to four hours and it must be given as a QID
drug. Complications of tacrine include gastrointestinal side effects and
transaminase elevation,[xxi]
and dropout rates in clinical trials have been high (>50 percent). We do not
recommend the use of this agent.
Donepezil has also been tested in short trials of patients with mild to
moderate AD and was associated with a slight improvement in cognitive function
or lack of further deterioration compared to placebo. These trials had a
drop-out rate of approximately 20 percent.[xxii],[xxiii]
The agent has not been associated with LFT abnormalities, although nausea
occurred in a small number of patients, and has a much longer half-life which
permits once-daily dosing. At present, it is not known which patients are most
likely to benefit from cholinesterase inhibitor therapy, which are most likely
to suffer adverse effects and what effects might be observed in patients with
intercurrent illness. The durability of cognitive improvement is similarly
unclear. It may be appropriate to request neurologic consultation before
initiating donepezil therapy.
In addition to anticholinergic drugs, anti-inflammatory agents, estrogens
and dietary antioxidants have all been studied in the treatment of Alzheimer’s
disease.[xxiv]
Studies of Ginkgo biloba suggest that
it may produce a very small improvement in cognitive function; the clinical
significance of this change is unknown.[xxv]
In one trial of 341 patients vitamin E (alpha-tocopherol) and selegiline,
both dietary antioxidants, delayed nursing home placement in patients with AD
when compared to placebo; they had no effect on cognitive function and were
associated with more frequent falls.[xxvi]
Estrogen therapy is not effective,[xxvii]
and there are no data to support the use of NSAIDS, steroids or COX-2
inhibitors. It is most appropriate to refer patients interested in
unconventional or untested AD therapies to the Sergeivsky Center at CPMC, where
there are several clinical trials of these agents underway.
(2) Common clinical syndromes:
BEHAVIORAL
PROBLEMS:
Wandering, aggression, yelling, inappropriate sexual behavior and
elopement are common in the demented, represent a burden to the caregiver both
in the home and in institutions, and complicate the care of the cognitively
impaired patient. Medical therapy can be effective, but there are no controlled
trials demonstrating the superiority of either low dose neuroleptics or
benzodiazepines. Both haldol 0.5-1 mg bid or ativan 0.5 mg bid are reasonable
first-line interventions.[xxviii]
Environmental measures - familiar caregivers, soft lighting, reassurance, music
- may be as effective as pharmacologic treatment in some settings. Prior to
therapy, any abrupt change in behavior in demented patients should spur a search
for an underlying medical cause such as infection, drug toxicity or delirium.
While it may be tempting to use physical restraints to prevent wandering
or falls, data suggest that the use of posey vests, wrist restraints and other
similar measures is actually associated with increased risk of injury and
aspiration; there have been reports of deaths in patients restrained by posey
vests. There are explicit guidelines governing the use of restraints in
inpatient settings, and ethical guidelines have been published by the American
Academy of Neurology.[xxix]
DEPRESSION:
As discussed above, dementia and depression can co-exist and treatment of
depression frequently improves cognitive ability.[xxx]
Sleep disorders can also contribute to decreased quality of life in elders, and
should be evaluated.[xxxi]
Elderly patients tend to require lower doses of antidepressant medication - a
starting dose of Prozac, for example, would be 5-10 mg rather than the usual
10-20 mg. Local resources include psychiatry consultation as well as the
Geriatric Depression service.
INCONTINENCE:
As dementia progresses, urinary incontinence becomes more common and can
complicate care and threaten patient dignity. Common causes of incontinence
include confusion, inability to get to the bathroom, medication, fecal
impaction, urinary tract infection, urge incontinence, stress incontinence and
overflow incontinence. While patients and caregivers may feel that this problem
is an inevitable result of “senility,” many forms of incontinence are
treatable, and the problem should be formally evaluated. History can provide
important clues to the differential and a diary (“bladder record”) can be
particularly helpful. Behavioral interventions such as scheduled toileting,
prompted voiding and habit training can alleviate the problem, and medication or
surgical therapy is sometimes indicated. A thorough discussion of incontinence
is beyond the scope of this chapter, but multiple resources are available,
including a Practice Guideline published by the Agency for Health Care Policy
and Research.[xxxii]
WEAKNESS:
Deconditioning and weakness can compound problems with gait, balance and
reflexes, predisposing demented patients to falls. Physical therapy can improve
quality of life and should be considered for all mobile patients who can
cooperate. Specific skill training (such as rising slowly, transferring from bed
to chair or commode or using a walker) is appropriate, as is counseling about
modifying the home environment. A family member or other caregiver should
arrange the household to ensure adequate lighting, limited obstacles (stairs,
throw-rugs, exposed electrical cords) and an easy way to call for assistance.
Special
Considerations
(1) Advance directives:
Respect
for a patient’s dignity and autonomy demands that the primary caregiver
explicitly address the issue of end of life care. Ideally, such a conversation
occurs before serious dementia sets in, while patients have the capacity to
designate health care proxies and discuss their values and priorities. You
should not assume that because a patient has Alzheimer’s disease s/he lacks
decisional capacity – this must be assessed on an individual basis for each
patient.[xxxiii]
This issue is addressed at length in chapter 6. Family members of demented
patients require education, counseling and support, particularly as they assume
greater and greater responsibility for proxy decision-making.
(2) Palliative care:
Decisions about withholding and withdrawing care from patients with
dementia can be complex and challenging, particularly if patients cannot
participate and have not previously discussed their wishes with their family or
physician. In general, there is a consensus that the most appropriate care for
patients with advanced dementia is comfort-oriented. Routine screening such as
Pap smears and mammography is generally not performed and interventions are
limited to the treatment of patients’ symptoms. Artificial hydration and
nutrition are often avoided, as are diagnostic testing, hospitalization and
resuscitation. These decisions must be carefully considered, discussed with the
patient and proxy, individualized and explicitly documented.
(3) Caregiver support:
Caring
for a family member with dementia can be exhausting, frustrating and emotionally
devastating and physicians should make a special effort to support the spouses,
children and other caregivers of demented patients. Counseling and support
groups can be very helpful, as can scheduled “holidays” when alternate care
mechanisms are planned. Adult day care centers are available for patients who
require supervision but not nursing care.
Decisions about nursing home placement can be complicated. Caregivers are
likely to feel guilt about “abandoning” family members, loss as they concede
that they are no longer able to care for the patient at home and relief at being
spared the burden of care. Financial concerns may also be prominent.
Anticipating these decisions and making appropriate referrals to social work can
ease the transition to nursing home care.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs.
Richard Mayeux and Mary Sano for their helpful comments and suggestions.
[i] Berrios.
Alzheimer’s disease: a conceptual history. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
1990;5:355-65.
[ii]
Skoog I, Nillson L, Palmertz B et al. A population-based study of dementia
in 85-year-olds. New Engl J Med 1993;328:153-58.
[iii]
Friedland LP. Epidemiology and neurobiology of the multiple determinants of
Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 1994;15:239-41.
[iv]
Jorm AF. Methods of screening for dementia: a meta-analysis of studies
comparing an informant questionnaire with a brief cognitive test. Alzheimer
Dis Assoc Disord 1997;11:158-62.
[v]
Siu, A. Screening for dementia and investigating its causes. Ann Intern Med
1991;115:122-32.
[vi]
Stoudemire A, Hill C, Gulley LR et al. Neuropsychological and biomedical
assessment of depression-dementia syndromes. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci
1989;1:347-61.
[vii]
Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA et al. Brain infarction and the clinical
expression of Alzheimer’s disease: the nun study. JAMA 1997;277:813-17.
[viii]
Lindenbaum J, Healton EB, Savage DG et al. Neuropsychiatric disorders caused
by cobalamin deficiency in the absence of anemia or macrocytosis. New Engl J
Med 1988;318:1720-8.
[ix]
Differential diagnosis of dementing diseases. NIH Consensus Statement 1987
July 6-8;6(11):1-9.
[x]
American Academy of Neurology. Practice parameter for diagnosis and
evaluation of dementia (summary statement): report of the Quality Standards
Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1994;44:2203-6.
[xi]
Recognition and initial assessment of Alzheimer’s disease and related
dementias: Clinical practice guideline No. 19. U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR
Publication No. 97-0702. November 1996.
[xii]
St George-Hyslop PH. Molecular genetics of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol
Psychiatry 2000;47:183-99.
[xiii]
Mayeux R, Saunders AM, Shea S et al. Utility of the apolipoprotein E
genotype in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. N Emgl J Med
1998;338:506-11.
[xiv]
Clarfield AM. The reversible dementias: do they reverse? Ann Intern Med
1988;109:476-86.
[xv]
Moore AR, O’Keefe ST. Drug-induced cognitive impairment in the elderly.
Drugs Aging 1999:15:15-28.
[xvi]
Mary Sano PhD, personal communication.
[xvii]
Summers WK, Majovski LV, Marsh GM et al. Oral tetrahydroaminoacridine in
long-term treatment of senile dementia, Alzheimer type. N Engl J Med
1986;315:1241-45.
[xviii]
Relman, AS. Special report: Tacrine as a treatment for Alzheimer’s
dementia (editor’s note). N Engl J Med 1991;324:349 - 52.
[xix]
Knapp, M, Knopman DS, Solomon PR.. A 30-week randomized controlled trial of
high-dose tacrine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA
1994;271:985-91.
[xx]
Conway EL. A review of the randomized controlled trials of tacrine in the
treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: methodologic considerations. Clin
Neuropharmacol 1998;21:8-17.
[xxi]
Gracon SI, Knapp MJ, Berghoff WG et al. Safety of tacrine: clinical trials,
treatment IND and postmarketing experience. Alzheimer Dis Associ Disord
1998;12:93-101.
[xxii]
Roger SL, Farlow MR, Doody RS et a. A 24-week double-blind placebo
controlled trial of donezepil in patients with Alzheimer’s disease.
Neurology 1998;50:136-45.
[xxiii]
Burns A, Rossor M, Hecker J et al. The effects of donezepil in Alzheimer’s
disease – results from a multinational trial. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord
1999;10:237-44.
[xxiv]
Mayeux RM, Sano M. Treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med
1999;341:1670-79.
[xxv]
Oken BS, Storzbach DM, Kaye JA. The efficacy of Gingko biloba on cognitive
function in Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neuro 1998;55:1409-15.
[xxvi]
Sano M, Ernesto C, Thomas RG et al. A controlled trial of selegiline, alpha-tocopherol
or both as treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med
1997;336:1216-22.
[xxvii]
Mulnard RA, CotmanCW, Kawas C et al. Estrogen replacement therapy for
treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled
trial. JAMA 2000;283:1007-15.
[xxviii]
Devanand DP, Marder K, Michaels KS et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled
dose-comparison trial of haloperidol for psychosis and disruptive behavior
in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:1512-20.
[xxix]
The American Academy of Neurology Ethics and Humanities Subcommittee.
Ethical issues in the management of the demented patient. Neurology
1996;46:1180-83.
[xxx]
Montano CB. Primary care issues related to the treatment of depression in
elderly patients. J Clin Psychiatry 1999;60 (Suppl 20) 45-51.
[xxxi]
Asplund R. Sleep disorders in the elderly. Drugs Aging 1999;14:91-103.
[xxxii]
Clinical Practice Guideline: Managing acute and chronic urinary
incontinence. US Department of Health and Human Services. Agency for Health
Care Policy and Research. AHCPR publication No 96-0686. March 1996.
[xxxiii]
Derse AR. Making decisions about life-sustaining medical treatment in
patients with dementia. The problem of patient decision-making capacity.
Theor Med Bioeth 1999;20:55-67.
Maximum
Score Score
|
|
|
Orientation: |
|
5 |
(
) |
What
is the (year) (season) (date) (day) (month) ? |
|
5 |
(
) |
Where
are we (state) (county) (town) (hospital) (floor) ? |
|
|
|
Registration: |
|
3 |
(
) |
Name
3 objects: 1 second to say each. Then ask the patient all 3 after you
have said them - give one point for each correct answer. Then repeat
them until patient learns all 3. Count number of trials and record: |
|
|
|
Attention
and calculation: |
|
5 |
(
) |
Serial
7’s (stop after 5 answers). One point for each correct.
Alternatively, spell “world” backwards. |
|
|
|
Recall: |
|
3 |
(
) |
Ask
for the 3 objects repeated above. Give one point for each correct. |
|
9 |
(
) |
Language: Name
a pencil and watch (2 points). Repeat the following: “No ifs ands or
buts” (one point). Follow a 3-stage command: “Take a piece of
paper in your right hand, fold it in half and put it on the floor”
(3 points). Read and obey the following: “Close your eyes” (one
point). Write a sentence (one point). Copy a design (one point). |
|
30 |
(
) |
Total
Score: |
|
|
|
Assess
level of consciousness along a continuum: Alert
---- Drowsy ---- Stupor ---- Coma |
Instructions
for Administration of Mini-Mental State Examination:
Orientation:
(1)
Ask for the date. Then ask specifically for parts omitted, e.g.,
“Can you also tell me what season it is?” One point for each correct.
(2)
Ask in turn “Can you tell me the name of this hospital?” (City,
state, etc.). One point for each correct.
Registration:
Ask the patient if you may test his or her memory. Then say the names of three unrelated objects, clearly and slowly, about one second for each. After you have said all three, ask the patient to repeat them. This first repetition determines the patient’s score (0-3), but keep saying them until he or she has learned all three (up to six trials). If the patient does not eventually learn all three, recall cannot be meaningfully tested.
Attention
and calculation:
Ask the patient to begin with 100 and count backwards by 7. Stop after 5 subtractions (93, 86, 79, 72, 65). Score the total number of correct answers. If the patient cannot or will not perform this task, ask him or her to spell the word “world” backwards. The score is the number of letters in correct order, e.g., dlrow = 5, dlorw = 3.
Recall:
Ask
the patient if he or she can recall the three words you previously asked
them to remember. Score 0-3.
Language:
Naming:
Show the patient a wrist watch and ask him or her what it is. Repeat for
pencil. Score 0-2.
Repetition:
Ask the patient to repeat the sentence. Allow only one trial. Score 0 or 1.
3-stage
command:
Give the patient a piece of blank paper and repeat the command. Score one
point for each part correctly executed.
Reading:
On a blank piece of paper print the sentence “Close your eyes,” in
letters large enough
for the patient to see clearly. Ask the patient to read it and do what it
says. Score one point only if the patient actually closes his or her eyes.
Writing:
Give the patient a blank piece of paper and ask him or her to write a
sentence (do not dictate a sentence - it is to be written spontaneously). It
must contain a subject and verb and be sensible, but correct grammar and
punctuation are not necessary. One point for a coherent sentence with
subject and verb.
Copying:
On a blank piece of paper, draw intersecting pentagrams, each side about one
inch,
and ask the patient to copy it exactly. All 10 angles must be present and
two must intersect to score one point. Tremor and rotation should be
ignored.
Adapted
from Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: a practical
method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J
Psych Res 1975;12:196-99.
Median
Mini-Mental State Examination Score by Age and Educational Level:
|
Age |
------------
Education ------------ |
|||
|
|
0
- 4 yrs |
5
- 8 yrs |
9
- 12 yrs |
>
12 yrs |
|
18-24 |
23 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
|
25-29 |
25 |
27 |
29 |
30 |
|
30-34 |
26 |
26 |
29 |
30 |
|
35-39 |
23 |
27 |
29 |
30 |
|
40-44 |
23 |
27 |
29 |
30 |
|
45-49 |
23 |
27 |
29 |
30 |
|
50-54 |
22 |
27 |
29 |
30 |
|
55-59 |
22 |
27 |
29 |
29 |
|
60-64 |
22 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
|
65-69 |
22 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
|
70-74 |
21 |
26 |
28 |
29 |
|
75-79 |
21 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
|
80-84 |
19 |
25 |
26 |
28 |
|
>
85 |
20 |
24 |
26 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adapted from
Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS et al. Population-based norms for the
mini-mental state examination by age and educational level. JAMA
1993;269:2386-91.
|
Type of medication |
Generic name |
Common trade name(s) |
|
Anticholinergic
agents |
scopolamine |
Transderm
Scop, |
|
|
orphenadrine |
Norflex,
Norgesic |
|
|
atropine |
Lomotil |
|
|
benztropine |
Cogentin |
|
|
meclizine |
Antivert |
|
|
homatropine |
Hycodan |
|
Antidepressants |
amitriptiline |
Elavil,
Triavil |
|
|
imipramine |
Tofranil |
|
|
desipramine |
Norpramine |
|
|
doxepin |
Sinequan |
|
|
trazodone |
Desyrel |
|
|
fluoxetine |
Prozac |
|
Antimanic
agents |
lithium |
Eskalith,
Lithobid, Lithotabs |
|
Antipsychotic
agents |
thioridazine |
Mellaril |
|
|
chlorpromazine |
Thorazine |
|
|
fluphenazine |
Prolixin |
|
|
trifluperazine |
Stelazine |
|
|
perphenazine |
Trilafon |
|
|
haloperidol |
Haldol |
|
Antiarrhythmic
agents |
quinidine |
Quinidex,
Quinaglute |
|
|
disopyramide |
Norpace |
|
Antifungal
agents |
amphoteracin
B |
|
|
|
ketoconazole |
Nizoral |
|
Antibiotics |
metronidazole |
Flagyl |
|
|
ciprofloxacin |
Cipro |
|
|
norfloxacin |
Noroxin |
|
|
ofloxacin |
Floxin |
|
|
cefuroxime |
Ceftin,
Zinacef |
|
|
cephalexin |
Keflex |
|
Antiemetics |
prochlorperazine |
Compazine |
|
|
metoclopramide |
Reglan |
|
|
hydroxyzine |
Atarax,
Vistaril |
|
|
meclazine |
Antivert |
|
|
diphenhydramine |
Benadryl,
Dramamine |
|
Anticonvulsants |
phenytoin |
Dilantin |
|
|
valproic
acid |
Depakene,
Depakote |
|
|
carbamezapine |
Tegretol |
|
Anti-Parkinsonian
agents |
levodopa |
Laradopa |
|
|
levodopa/carbidopa |
Sinemet |
|
|
bromocryptine |
Parlodel |
|
|
pergolide |
Permax |
|
Antineoplastic
agents |
chlorambucil |
Leukeran |
|
|
cytarabine |
|
|
|
interleukin
2 |
|
|
Antihypertensive
agents |
beta
blockers
propranolol
metoprolol
atenolol
timolol |
Inderal Lopressor Tenormin Timoptic |
|
|
alpha
blockers
methyldopa
clonidine
prazosin |
Aldomet Catapres,
Combipres Minpress |
|
|
calcium
channel blockers
verapamil
nifedipine
diltiazem |
Calan,
Isoptin Procardia,
Adalat Cardizem |
|
Inotropes |
digoxin |
Lanoxin |
|
Benzodiazepines |
diazepam |
Valium |
|
|
chlordiazepoxide |
Librium |
|
|
lorazepam |
Ativan |
|
|
triazolam |
Halcion |
|
|
alprazolam |
Xanax |
|
|
flurazepam |
Dalmane |
|
NSAIDS |
ibuprofen |
Motrin,
Advil, Nuprin |
|
|
naproxen |
Naprosyn,
Anaprox, Aleve |
|
|
indomethacin |
Indocin |
|
|
sulindac |
Clinoril |
|
|
sidlunisal |
Dolobid |
|
H2
receptor antagonists |
cimetidine |
Tagamet |
|
|
ranitidine |
Zantac |
|
|
famotidine |
Pepcid |
|
|
nizatidine |
Axid |
|
Radiocontrast
media |
various |
|
|
Corticosteroids |
hydrocortisone |
Cortef,
neo-cortef |
|
|
prednisone |
Deltasone |
|
Skeletal
muscle relaxants |
cyclobenzaprine |
Flexaril |
|
|
baclofen |
Lioresal |
|
Antihistamines/decongestants |
diphenhydramine |
Benadryl,
Tylenol PM, Sominex |
|
|
chlorpheniramine |
Chlor-trimeton,
Contac, others |
|
|
brompheniramine |
Dimetane,
Dimetapp, others |
|
|
pseudoephedrine |
Sudafed,
Actifed, Robitussin, Claritin, Entex, Tylenol-cold, others |
|
|
phenylpropanolamine |
Triaminic,
Ornade, others |