CHAPTER 16
OSTEOARTHRITIS,
GOUT AND PSEUDOGOUT
Katherine G.
Nickerson M.D.
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis (OA) represents a progressive process of softening, ulceration, and destruction of articular cartilage frequently associated with the formation of bony and cartilaginous excrescences at joint margins (osteophytes). Although the pathogenesis of primary (idiopathic) OA is not understood, it is probably caused by factors that disrupt the balance between cartilage synthesis and breakdown and thus represents a disturbance in cartilage physiology rather than simple mechanical wear and tear. Clinically, it is slowly progressive, occurs late in life, and principally affects the hands and large weight-bearing joints. OA can also represent the final common pathway of a variety of other insults to cartilage integrity, as listed in Table 1.[i]
Pain
is the primary presenting complaint of patients with osteoarthritis, and is
usually described as a deep, dull ache localized to the affected joint. The pain
from osteoarthritis is not caused by articular cartilage, which is aneural. The
mechanism of pain can be multifactorial.[ii]
Subchondral bone can have microfractures or symptomatic medullary hypertension,
osteophytes can cause stretching of nerve endings in the periosteum, ligaments
may be stretched, the joint capsule can be inflamed or distended, the synovium
may be inflamed and muscles may spasm. Disability associated with the pain of OA
is common, and by some estimates, osteoarthritis of the knee is the leading
cause of chronic disability in the United States.[iii]
Age is the single strongest risk factor for OA, and the prevalence of OA
in the population over age 50 is high, although ascertainment varies with the
technique (radiologic, autopsy, clinical symptoms). Over 50 percent of people
age 60 and greater have some clinical signs of OA, and the prevalence increases
with age.[iv]
Men and women are equally affected by OA of the hips, but women more frequently
have hand and knee involvement. Obesity is a risk factor for OA of
weight-bearing joints, and heredity (especially in OA of the hands and
generalized OA) is an additional risk factor. Trauma to a joint, particularly
fracture or ligament injury, is clearly associated with subsequent OA. The role
of repetitive use without overt injury (i.e. running, repetitive stereotypic
movements) remains somewhat controversial. It appears, however, that in the
absence of underlying anatomical abnormalities, weakness or soft tissue
injuries, normal joints tolerate prolonged and vigorous exercise without
accelerating the development of OA.
TABLE 1: Classification of Osteoarthritis
|
Idiopathic: Hands (Heberden’s and Bouchard’s nodes, erosive
interphalangeal arthritis) Feet (hallux valgus, hallux rigidis) Knee (patellofemoral, medial or lateral
compartments) Hip Spine |
|
Secondary: Trauma Congenital (e.g. congenital dislocation of the hip) Metabolic (e.g. ochronosis hemochromatosis, gout,
CPPD) Endocrine (acromegaly, obesity) Inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) |
Diagnosis:
As noted,
patients with OA most often present with pain. They may also have limited range
of motion and bony deformities. Unless the condition is accompanied by CPPD (see
below), they do not usually have inflammatory signs. An exception is in OA of
the hand where there may be an inflammatory phase in the evolution of
Heberden’s and Bouchard’s nodes (bony deformities of the DIP and PIP joints,
respectively). This usually resolves, however, leaving deformities that may be
cosmetically distressing but are rarely the cause of significant disability. OA
may be accompanied by morning stiffness, but it is usually brief (a few minutes)
compared to patients with inflammatory arthritis (hours). The physical
examination may demonstrate bony deformities, crepitus, and limited range of
motion. Gait disturbances are common.
Laboratory tests are normal and joint fluid, if obtained, has normal viscosity and a non-inflammatory profile (< 2000 WBC). It is an error to assume that the presence of a positive ANA, an elevated ESR, or the presence of rheumatoid factor excludes the diagnosis of OA; age alone can cause all of these abnormalities. OA can also co-exist with other arthritides, such as RA and gout or pseudogout. Although there is active interest in using serologic and synovial fluid biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of disease activity, these are still investigational. Standard x-rays are poor tools for the diagnosis of OA; they are neither sensitive nor specific. More than 90 percent of persons over the age of 40 will have some radiographic change consistent with OA on hip and knee films, for example, but only about 30 percent will have symptoms.[v] Neither joint-space narrowing nor the presence of osteophytes is correlated with intraarticular pathology in patients with early OA.
Treatment
of osteoarthritis:
There is no cure for OA. Patients must understand their role in managing pain, maintaining mobility and minimizing disability. Progression of disease, either symptomatically or radiographically is not inevitable. In fact, many patients with OA of the hip or knee remain stable over long periods of time. It is thus important to be encouraging and hopeful.
Maintaining muscle strength and range of motion, and learning about body
mechanics may be extremely helpful. It is possible to reverse the downward
spiral of pain, inactivity and muscle weakness through exercise or a physical
therapy program. The patient may be able to do this on his or her own. Multiple
studies have demonstrated the efficacy of exercise. A randomized controlled
trial of supervised walking in patients with moderate OA of the knee
demonstrated that those who walked had decreased pain, decreased need for
medications, and improved function.[vi] Motivated patients may
also benefit from aerobic exercise such as swimming, walking or bicycling.[vii]
Low impact activities are preferable when there is OA in weight-bearing joints.
Some patients are helped by a formal course of physical therapy, where they can
learn isometric exercises to maintain strength, as well as to improve range of
motion. The goal should be to educate patients to do as much as possible on
their own. Prescriptions for physical therapy can be simple, e.g. “Dx: OA of
the knee; Rx: range of motion and strengthening exercises.” We strongly
suggest that all patients with OA be counseled about the advantages of exercise
and referred to physical therapy if interested.
TABLE 2: Goals of physical therapy in OA (adapted from Minor)[viii]
|
·
Reduction of impairment and improvement of function; ie, reduction of
joint pain, increases in range of motion and strength, normalization of
gait and facilitation of the performance of daily activities. |
|
·
Protection of the OA join from further damage by reducing stress on
the joint, attenuating joint forces, and improving biomechanics |
|
·
Prevention of disability and poor health secondary to inactivity by
increasing the daily level of physical activity and improving physical
fitness |
Pharmacologic therapy
Every treatment guideline for the management of osteoarthritis concludes
that acetaminophen should be the drug of first choice. Although NSAIDs are heavily marketed and prescribed, their
use for OA has been called into question.[ix]
Despite expert recommendations that they not be used as first-line drugs for OA,
NSAIDs often are; 50 percent of all NSAID prescriptions are for the treatment of
OA.[x]
NSAIDs were first developed as anti-inflammatory agents to treat
conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis. They have been widely used for other
indications because of their excellent analgesic properties. Cyclooxygenase-2
(COX-2) inhibitors have also been heavily marketed for use in OA; these agents
are effective analgesics but are extremely expensive and no long-term safety
data are available. There are, also, no trials comparing analgesic efficacy of
these agents to acetaminophen. Specific
COX-2 inhibitors, such as celecoxib (Celebrex), are associated with fewer
“endoscopic ulcers” than traditional NSAIDs, which inhibit both COX-1 and
COX-2 enzymes.[xi],[xii]
The long-term implications of this observation are unclear, as is the
significance of endoscopic ulcers. There has been at least one case report of
gastropathy due to celecoxib.[xiii]
There
are at least four reasons why the long-term use of NSAIDs in OA has been
questioned:
Ø
Lack of efficacy: While NSAIDs are clearly superior to placebo in providing pain relief,
they have not been shown to be superior to acetaminophen in the treatment of OA.
There are hundreds of trials comparing various agents to placebo, but very few
that compare NSAIDs and acetaminophen directly; all
of these trials show that the two classes are equivalent. For example, one study
compared acetaminophen to low and high dose ibuprofen in patients with OA of the
knees;[xiv]
there was no difference in pain relief among the three groups.
Ø
Toxicity: This is a non-trivial concern, particularly in the elderly. The
dose-dependent, age-dependent risk of GI bleed, perforation and death is well
known. Ten to twenty percent of people taking NSAIDs have dyspepsia, and an
estimated 7.3 of every 1000 patients with OA who take NSAIDs for one year have a
serious gastrointestinal complication.[xv]
NSAIDs can also cause or exacerbate hypertension, hyperkalemia, congestive heart
failure, and renal insufficiency.
Ø
Possible adverse effect on cartilage: There is circumstantial evidence that NSAIDs
may accelerate articular breakdown in patients with OA. In vitro and animal
studies demonstrate decreased proteoglycan synthesis and marked acceleration in
cartilage destruction in the presence of NSAIDs. One trial of indomethacin in OA
of the hip showed that patients on indomethacin came to hip replacement more
quickly than a control population.[xvi]
The surgeons in this study were not blinded, however, and the radiographic
methods used in the study have been criticized. More definitive studies of this
question are underway.
Ø
Cost:
The average cost of a year’s supply of NSAIDs is more than five times that of
high-dose generic acetaminophen.
Our recommendation is that chronic NSAID (or COX-2 inhibitor) use is to be avoided if possible. If a patient is taking an NSAID, it is appropriate to substitute high-dose acetaminophen for a month or two and see if the patient notices a difference. It is important to review proper dosing (standing as well as prn for breakthrough). A patient with normal hepatic function can be given up to four grams a day of acetaminophen (two extra-strength tylenol QID). If acetaminophen alone fails to relieve pain, and the patient is doing everything possible in terms of physical therapy, exercise and nonpharmacologic modalities for pain relief, and the joints in question are not candidates for joint replacement, other analgesics can be considered. These include tramadol (Ultram), codeine, codeine plus tylenol, propoxyphene (Darvon) and propoxyphene plus tylenol (Darvocet).
Surgery
Exercise: low impact, aerobic and isometric |
Physical Therapy: see table 2 |
Weight Reduction |
|
Medication: Acetaminophen:
first line agent |
|
Surgery:
When
pain is continuous or function is sufficiently limiting to warrant the
risk of major surgery and when the patient is sufficiently motivated and
able to engage in rehabilitation program. |
Gout includes a range of clinical disorders, from the familiar, exquisitely painful, acute monoarticular arthritis to chronic, crippling polyarthritis. Gout is almost always associated with chronically elevated levels of serum uric acid, and acute attacks are often triggered by events that precipitously raise or lower the serum uric acid level. The dramatic inflammatory response that characterizes acute attacks of gout is probably triggered by uric acid crystals stimulating monocytes to release mediators such as IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) that subsequently promote entry of neutrophils into the joint. The tendency of uric acid to crystallize in joints may partly be related to lower temperature (especially distal joints), and a decrease in solubility in synovial fluid compared to serum.
Epidemiology:
The risk of developing gout is directly related to the level and duration
of elevated uric acid. The overall prevalence is approximately 2-3 per thousand
individuals, but for those with a serum uric acid greater than 9.0 mg, the
five-year cumulative incidence is nearly 25 percent. In the general population,
hyperuricemia rises with increasing age, weight, and serum creatinine: in 90
percent of patients, primary gout is related to underexcretion rather than
overproduction of uric acid. The cause of this underexcretion is not known, but
may be a renal tubular defect. In men, the uric acid level rises starting in
puberty, while in women it rises after menopause, so that the onset is typically
several decades earlier in men than women.
TABLE 4: Risk factors for hyperuricemia
Age
Gender (rises in men at puberty vs. in women at menopause) Weight Creatinine Blood pressure Alcohol intake Diet Medications (diuretics, aspirin, nicotinic acid, cyclosporine) |
In many patients, the development of clinical gout is accelerated by
secondary factors such as renal insufficiency, alcohol consumption, diuretic
use, or low doses of aspirin, all of which inhibit renal excretion of uric acid.
(Alcohol may also increase uric acid synthesis). Cyclosporine and nicotinic acid
are also associated with hyperuricemia and gout. Myeloproliferative disorders,
psoriasis, and hyperthyroidism may be associated with overproduction of uric
acid and gout.
Rare X-linked enzyme disorders such as those of hypoxanthine-guanine
phosphorbosyl transferase (HPRT) deficiency (Lesch-Nyhan syndrome) and
overactivity of
phosphorbosyl pyrophosphate (PRPP) synthetase also lead to overproduction
of uric acid and severe gout, as well as neurologic impairment. G6PD deficiency
is also associated with gout.
Gout is negatively associated with rheumatoid arthritis and other
rheumatologic conditions, such as lupus and amyloidosis. This observation
appears to be more than just an artifact of their incidence in separate
populations (older men vs. younger women), and various explanations have been
proffered, including low synovial complement levels, saturated Fc receptors, and
the uricosuric effect of high-dose aspirin in RA patients.
Clinical Syndromes:
The clinical spectrum of gout includes four stages:
asymptomatic hyperuricemia, acute attacks of gouty arthritis, intercritical
gout, and chronic tophaceous gout.
Asymptomatic hyperuricemia refers
to the period of time in which the serum uric acid level is elevated without
either attacks of acute gout or nephrolithiasis.
The risk of attacks of gout is related to the serum uric acid
concentration, while the risk of nephrolithiasis increases in relation to the
daily uric acid excretion. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia most often lasts
throughout the individual’s lifetime. If gout occurs, it is usually after
several decades of sustained hyperuricemia. Thus, among men, the peak incidence
is in the fourth to sixth decade whereas in women it is several decades later.
There is rarely an indication for treating asymptomatic hyperuricemia.
TABLE 5: Events that commonly trigger acute gouty arthritis
|
Trauma, acute illness or surgery Dehydration Ethanol use Dietary indiscretion Drugs: diuretics, low-dose aspirin, nicotinic acid,
cyclosporine, heparin |
Attacks of acute gout usually last from two to ten days and are most
often monoarticular at the outset. In about one half of all initial attacks, the
first metatarsal joint (the great toe) is involved, and the term podagra
is used. Next in order of frequency of involved sites are the insteps and
ankles, heels, knees, and wrists. Any joint can be involved, but only rarely the
shoulders, hips, spine or sacroiliac joints. More distal joints are frequently
involved, in part because of their lower temperature. There are, in fact, rare
reported cases of gout in persistently normouricemic people,[xviii]
apparently related to the decreased temperature of their extremities. Any acute
rise or fall in the serum uric acid level tends to bring about an attack. Thus,
dehydration, an increase in diuretic therapy, alcohol ingestion, trauma, acute
illness, surgery or the institution of allopurinol may all be associated with
acute gout. The level of uric acid at the time of an acute attack, therefore,
may not accurately reflect usual levels, and care should be taken in its
interpretation. The typical gout attack begins at night, is intensely painful,
and may be associated with fever and chills. A feeling for the experience comes
from this classic description by Syndenham:
The victim goes to bed and sleeps in good health. About two o’clock in the morning he is awakened by a severe pain in the great toe; more rarely in the heel, ankle or instep. This pain is like that of a dislocation, and yet the parts feel as if cold water were poured over them. Then follow chills and shivers and a little fever. Now it is a violent stretching and tearing of the ligaments – now it is a gnawing pain and now a pressure and tightening…it cannot bear the weight of bedclothes, nor the jar of a person walking in the room. The night is passed in torture, sleeplessness, turning of the part affected, and perpetual change of posture; the tossing about of the body being as incessant as the pain of the tortured joint.[xix]
Intervals between gout attacks are called intercritical periods and may vary in length from months to years. Most patients have a recurrence within the first year after their first attack, and the frequency of attacks usually increases with time in the absence of treatment. Later attacks may become polyarticular, more severe, longer, and accompanied by fever. Characteristic erosions with overhanging edges develop on x-ray as deposits of uric acid are laid down and erode bone. As this phase evolves, the patient may develop chronic polyarticular gout without pain-free intercritical periods. This persistent polyarthritis, which is erosive and deforming, may easily be mistaken for rheumatoid arthritis, and tophi can be mistaken for rheumatoid nodules. Joint aspiration or aspiration of a tophus is the key to making the correct diagnosis and instituting the appropriate therapy in a patient presenting with polyarthritis and an elevated serum uric acid level.
The length of time between the first attack of gout and the evolution of visible tophi is highly variable and may range from a few years to four decades. The degree of tophaceous deposition is largely a function of the degree and the duration of hyperuricemia. The classic location of tophi is the helix or antihelix of the ear, but they commonly occur on the knuckles, Achilles’ tendons, knees or feet. They are also commonly found along the extensor surface of the forearm or as saccular distentions of the olecranon bursa. As patients develop chronic tophaceous gout, acute attacks of arthritis may become less frequent and milder. Tophi can break down, ulcerate and extrude a white chalky or pasty material composed entirely of uric acid.
Hyperuricemia and the kidney
Uric
acid kidney stones occur in 10 to 25 percent of patients with primary gout, and
the risk rises by 50 percent in those with urinary uric acid excretion rates
greater than 1000mg. Uric acid stones may be an indication for the institution
of allopurinol and are a contradiction to uricosuric agents.
Although
gout is frequently associated with renal insufficiency, hyperuricemia itself
does not appear to be the cause of declining renal function. “Urate
nephropathy” is no longer thought to be a real clinical entity, and the renal
insufficiency commonly found in patients with gout is now considered to be
caused by coexisting hypertension, nonsteroidal use or lead exposure (which can
cause both “saturnine gout” and renal insufficiency). In contrast, the
extremely high levels of uric acid seen in the tumor lysis syndromes and after
chemotherapy can precipitate in the kidney and cause acute renal failure. For
this reason, allopurinol is often used before chemotherapy.
Diagnosis of gout:
The diagnosis of acute or chronic gouty arthritis is made by
demonstrating intracellular monosodium urate crystals in joint fluid. Urate
crystals are needle shaped and negatively birefringent as viewed under polarized
light. Extracellular crystals can often be found in synovial fluid or tissues in
the intercritical period, occasionally allowing a tentative diagnosis to be made
even after an acute attack has subsided. During an acute attack, synovial fluid
has a high WBC count (2,000 – 100,000) with a predominance of
polymorphonuclear leukocytes. The glucose is usually normal. A culture should
always be sent, as gout can coexist with infectious arthritis as well as calcium
pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease (see below). In advanced tophaceous
gout, x-rays may show characteristic erosions with overhanging edges
representing erosive tophaceous deposits. In the absence of an active joint
effusion to tap, a tentative diagnosis may be made on the basis of a classic
history of acute, self-limited attacks of monoarthritis, followed by
intercritical periods, accompanied by chronically elevated uric acid levels.
Treatment of gout:
There is rarely an indication for treating asymptomatic hyperuricemia. In
the past, this condition was considered a possible risk factor for
atherosclerosis and for chronic renal insufficiency, but both of these beliefs
have been dispelled. The majority of patients with hyperuricemia have no
symptoms and no adverse effects; therefore no treatment is warranted.
During an acute attack of gout, changes in diuretics or other medications
(including allopurinol) should be avoided. There is no indication for starting
allopurinol during an acute attack of gout. The options for treatment include
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, colchicine, ACTH, oral or intraarticular
corticosteroids, or, alternatively, pain medications alone.[xx]
Nonsteroidals, unless
contraindicated, should be the first line of treatment, keeping in mind the
toxicities discussed above. Indomethacin is very effective in doses of 150-200
mg per day for two or three days and then tapered to 75-100mg daily over the
next week. Naprosyn at doses of 500mg bid
to tid or ibuprofen at a dose of
2400-3200 mg/day in divided doses. Other NSAIDS are probably also effective, but
there is less experience with their use. COX-2 inhibitors have not been studied
in the treatment of gout. In the face of renal insufficiency or severe
hypertension, NSAIDS should be used in more sparing doses. Aspirin should be
avoided, as low doses of aspirin inhibit renal clearance of uric acid, and very
high doses increase renal clearance of uric acid – in either case potentially
worsening or precipitating acute attacks.
Colchicine is sometimes used
as an alternative to nonsteroidals. It inhibits microtubules and the migration
of polymorphonuclear neutrophils. Colchicine is most effective is administered
in the first 24 hours after onset of symptoms: the earlier the better. It can be
given orally, 0.6mg every hour, up to 6 to 8 tablets (4.8mg). However, diarrhea
frequently ensues, and patients should be warned of this side effect. As the
diarrhea often occurs before or coincidentally with relief of pain, the use of
colchicine as a solitary agent is limited. Other adverse effects include bone
marrow suppression, myopathy, neuropathy, oligospermia and amenorrhea. It should
be used with caution in the face of renal insufficiency, hepatic insufficiency
or marrow compromise. The use of intravenous colchicine is controversial because
of its toxity; safer alternatives are almost always available.
ACTH and intra-articular or
systemic corticosteroids are alternatives whem nonsteroidals and colchicine
are contraindicated because of the concurrence of gastrointestinal,
cardiovascular or renal disease.[xxi],[xxii]
ACTH, 40 IU given as a single IM injection may frequently be effective in
treating acute gouty attacks. Its use is limited by the fact that it is rarely
available outside of a hospital or emergency room. If symptoms persist, a second
injection 12 hours later can be administered. Oral steroids, if appropriately
tapered over a week, are usually very effective. One suggested regimen is
prednisone 30 mg bid for two days,
then 20 mg bid for two days, then
10mg bid for two days. Potential
side effects of ACTH and short-course steroids are similar, and are usually
limited to transient increases in blood sugar and blood pressure. The
association of avascular necrosis with short courses of steroids remains
controversial. Intraarticular steroids are useful when only one or two joints
are involved and after infection has been excluded with a negative culture.
Prophylaxis of gout:
Patients whose lives are disrupted by frequent attacks of gout may be candidates for prophylactic therapy. Weight loss and restriction of alcohol should be recommended for all patients. Some patients describe attacks after eating particular foods with high purine content such as organ meats, herring, anchovies, sardines, bacon, or asparagus. Although may be useful to instruct these patients to avoid specific foods, general prudent dietary advice to maintain a normal weight and to avoid foods high in saturated fat will usually accomplish the same goal. If diuretics or other medications are a factor and alternative therapies are available, these changes should be made.
Colchicine, 0.6 mg once or twice daily, is usually effective prophylactic therapy.
As the therapeutic window of this drug is extremely narrow, the dose may need to
be adjusted in the setting of renal insufficiency, liver disease, or if the
colchicine provokes diarrhea. Sometimes 0.6 mg every other day is effective in
these patients. Colchicine should not be used at all in patients with bone
marrow compromise. Myopathy, neuropathy and infertility can also result from
chronic colchicine use. Patients should be carefully counseled about potential
side effects.
Allopurinol therapy is indicated for patients with gout due to increased uric acid
production, uric acid renal calculi, tophaceous or polyarticular gout, or as
prophylaxis prior to cytolytic chemotherapy. Allopurinol inhibits xanthine
oxidase and, thus, the formation of uric acid. Although generally well
tolerated, it is associated with potential serious side effects, including rash,
bone marrow suppression, hepatitis, and vasculitis. Renal insufficiency and
concomitant diuretic use are risk factors for severe toxicity and the dose must
be lowered in either setting. Some clinicians are inclined to institute
allopurinol therapy earlier than others – arguing that even the first attack
of gout reflects years of microcrystalline urate deposits in cartilage and other
tissues and that prophylaxis with colchicine does not alter the progression of
this process. Others argue that tophi or chronic gouty arthritis develop in only
a minority of patients with gout and that allopurinol may reasonably be withheld
until either a failure of colchicine prophylaxis or gross evidence of tophaceous
deposits occurs. The level of uric acid may be a helpful tool in deciding which
course to adopt; levels under 8 mg/dl are probably associated with only a small
risk of the development of tophi, whereas at levels of 10 mg/dl or greater, the
deposition of uric acid is likely to evolve much faster. When starting a patient
on allopurinol, the patient’s gout must be quiescent and prophylactic
colchicine should have been given for at least a week. Allopurinol should then
be started at a dose of 100 mg a day and the dose titrated to the uric acid
level, aiming for a level within the normal range. Colchicine should be
continued during this titration to avoid attacks of gout induced by a falling
uric acid level. The usual dose of allopurinol for a patient with normal renal
function is 300mg/day. If the GFR is 40 ml/min, the recommended dose is 150
mg/day and when the GFR is less than 20, the recommended dose is 100 mg every
second or third day.
Uricosuric agents such as probenecid and sulfinpyrazone may be useful in the appropriate
setting. Although generally less effective than allopurinol, they may be helpful
for patients under 60 years old without a history of uric acid stones, who have
normal renal function and rates of urinary excretion less than 700 mg of uric
acid per day.
Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease (CPPD): Pseudogout
Calcium
pyrophosphate crystals were first identified in 1961 as a cause of acute
arthritis simulating gout. The disease spectrum has since been expanded, as
chronic, polyarticular forms of arthritis have been recognized. A great mimic,
CPPD disease is also called pseudogout.
It can simulate many of the other arthritides, presenting as acute, subacute or
chronic disease.
The
clincial prevalence of pseudogout compared to gout is approximately 1:2. If the
presence of chondrocalcinosis on knee x-rays is used as a criterion, however,
many minimally symptomatic, asymptomatic and undiagnosed patients are
identified. The prevalence of chondrocalcinosis on x-ray is as high as 30 to 60
percent in people over 85 years. Although the majority of patients with CPDD
have idiopathic disease, there are several metabolic disorders associated with
the disease (Table 6). Pseudogout is clearly associated with hypercalcemic
disorders such as hyperparathyroidism, as well as with hemochromatosis, where
iron deposition in cartilage has been implicated. The precise disturbance in
cartilage pathophysiology that leads to crystal formation is not known. Unless
the disease is found in young patients or those with hypercalcemia or abnormal
iron studies, there is no need for an extensive search for underlying metabolic
causes.
TABLE 6: Classification of CPPD
|
Primary
(idiopathic Hereditary Secondary: ·
Hyperparathyroidism ·
Hemochromatosis ·
Hypomagnesemia ·
Osteoarthritis |
Diagnosis of CPPD is made by analysis of synovial fluid. The demonstration of intracellular birefringent calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals is the most definitive way to make the diagnosis. However, these crystals may disintegrate after a few hours at room temperature – if there is a strong suspicion, repeat joint aspiration may be warranted. Linear calcifications along the fibrocartilage or hyaline cartilage of affected joints are called chondrocalcinosis and may provide adjunctive diagnostic information. Degenerative changes are often found in association.
Treatment of CPPD is symptomatic. There is no agent that successfully
reverses deposition or formation of calcium pyrophosphate in joints. Joint fluid
aspiration, NSAIDS, and intraarticular corticosteroids are all useful for
managing an acute attack. Colchicine 0.6 mg once or twice a day may be used as
prophylaxis, as in gout.
[i] Brandt KD, Mankin HJ, Shulman LE. Workshop on etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1988;13:1126-60.
[ii] Brandt KD. Diagnosis and nonsurgical management of osteoarthritis. Professional Communications Inc 1996;p 55-56.
[iii] Peyron JG, Altman RD. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In: Moskowitz RW, Howell DS, Goldberg M. et al, eds. Osteoarthritis:Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA. Wb Saunders Co: 1992;15-37.
[iv] Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC et al. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:778-99.
[v] Lawrence JS, Bremner JM, Bier F. Osteoarthrosis: prevalence in the population and relationship between symptoms and xray changes. Ann Rheum Dis 1966;25:1.
[vi] Kovar PA, Allegrante JP, Mackenzie R et al. Supervised fitness walking in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:529-34.
[vii] Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD et al. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part 1: Osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis and Rheumatism 1995;38:1535-40.
[viii] Minor M. Exercise in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee and hip. Arthritis Care Res 1994;7:198-204.
[ix] Brandt KD. Should osteoarthritis be treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs? Rheum Dis Clin NA 1993;19:697-712.
[x] Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Anderson SL et al. The therapeutic approaches of community-based primary care practitioners to osteoarthritis of the hip in elderly patients. J Rheumatol 1991;18:1593-1600.
[xi] Geis GS, Hubbard R, Callison D et al. Safety and efficacy of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [abstract] Arthritis Rheum 1998;41(suppl):S364. Abstract 1990.
[xii] Geis GS, Stead H, Morant S et al. Efficacy and safety of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [abstract] Arthritis Rheum 1998;41(suppl):S316. Abstract 1699.
[xiii] Mohammed S, Croom DW. Gastropathy due to celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor [letter]. N Engl J Med 1999;340:2005-06.
[xiv] Bradley JD, Brandt KD, Katz BP et al. Comparison of an anti-inflammatory dose of ibuprofen, and analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med 1991;325:87-81.
[xv] Wolfe, MM, Lichtenstein DR, Singh G. Medical progress: Gastrointestinal toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1888-1900.
[xvi] Rashad S, Revell P, Hemingway A et al. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on the course of osteoarthritis. Lancet 1989;519-22.
[xvii] Hochberg MC, Altman RD, Brandt KD et al. Guidelines for the medical management of osteoarthritis. Part II. Osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis and Rheumatism 1995;38:1541-46.
[xviii] McCarty, DJ. Gout without hyperuricemia. JAMA 1994;271:302.
[xix] Sydenham, T. The works of Thomas Syndenham, translated from the Latin by RG Lathan, Vol II. London, New Syndenham Society, 1850, p.124.
[xx] Emmerson BT. The management of gout. N Engl J Med 1996;334:445-51.
[xxi] Axelrod D, Preston S. Comparison of parenteral adrenocorticotropic hormone with oral indomethacin in the treatment of acute gout. Arthritis and Rheumatism 1988;31:803.
[xxii] Groff G, Franck WA, Raddatz DA. Systemic steroid therapy for acute gout: a clinical trial and review of the literature. Semin in Arthritis and Rheumatism 1990;19:329-35.