SAFE bill negotiations continue (Wired)
Fight Continues for Crypto Bill
by Rebecca Vesely
3:25pm 19.Sep.97.PDT Backers of a much-amended House bill intended to
scrap much of the federal government's restrictive rules on encryption
today were in the midst of talks they hope will salvage some part of
the original legislation.
House staffers said that negotiations on the Security and Freedom
through Encryption Act, sponsored by Representative Bob Goodlatte
(R-Virginia), included a quid pro quo: tougher criminal and
law-enforcement provisions would be inserted in exchange for softening
amendments that would greatly limit the use of strong encryption in
the United States.
In addition to more severe penalties for illegal use of encryption,
the FBI would get more funding for buying new computers and software
and hiring security specialists to aid in crypto enforcement.
"We're offering them the biggest, baddest computers," said Connie
Correll, spokeswoman for Representative Rick White (R-Washington), who
is leading negotiations. "But the terms are constantly changing. The
negotiations are very fluid."
As introduced, the Goodlatte bill would have ended the government's
limits on exporting software containing strong encryption -
data-scrambling features that guard privacy in transactions and
communications. The bill's other principal thrust was to prohibit
creation of a domestic key recovery system - a regime that would use a
software feature to give law enforcement and national security
agencies rapid access to encrypted data. The bill has enjoyed
enthusiastic support from the software industry, eager to maintain its
competitive advantage in the world marketplace, and from civil
liberties and privacy advocates who see the legislation as a barrier
to government snooping in the networked world.
On the other side, the FBI and the National Security Agency have
attacked the Goodlatte bill. They want domestic key recovery to track
down digital criminals and export restrictions to limit the
availability of crypto.
However, the heavy-duty opposition did nothing to slow the bill down
until last week, when it went to the Intelligence and National
Security committees for mark-up. What emerged from those sessions was
a bill that, if passed, would do just the reverse of what Goodlatte
set out to accomplish. Among the changes: A national key recovery
system would be mandated; starting in January 2000, the FBI would get
access, through a court order, to encrypted communications; the
president and secretary of defense would get to make the call on
exporting crypto software products; and heavy prison terms and fines
would be imposed on violators.
The negotiations center on amendments that await the bill in the
Commerce Committee next week. Washington Republican Rick White, along
with Mike Oxley (R-Ohio) and Billy Tauzin (R-Louisiana), has been
meeting with privacy groups, industry lobbyists, and law enforcement,
and at least a half-dozen staffers are reportedly working
'round-the-clock to forge a deal.
Oxley, a former FBI agent, has been pushing a provision to ban
encryption that could not be immediately decrypted by law enforcement.
It's unclear, however, whether he actually has the votes to get such
tough language passed.
One possible outcome would be stalemate for this year. But White, for
one, says that waiting until next year is not an option.
"We have zero credibility on the Internet if we can't solve this
issue," White said.
Copyright © 1993-97 Wired Ventures Inc. and affiliated companies.
All rights reserved.