(Published Version) And Lead Us Not...
Download here: Peters, Benjamin. "And Lead Us Not into Thinking the New is New: A Bibliographic Case for New Media History," New Media & Society, Vol. 11: nos. 1/2. (2009).
Watch for round two at the forthcoming ICA preconference, The Future is Prologue, May 21, 2009.
Typo correction: The sentence, "Of course, Mumford has been faulted by Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Friedrich Kittler for relying too heavily on the intrinsic logics of technologies, but still the study of ‘stuff ’ persists" originally read in the uncorrected proof, "Of course, Mumford has been faulted together with Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Friedrich Kittler...."
Watch for round two at the forthcoming ICA preconference, The Future is Prologue, May 21, 2009.
Typo correction: The sentence, "Of course, Mumford has been faulted by Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Friedrich Kittler for relying too heavily on the intrinsic logics of technologies, but still the study of ‘stuff ’ persists" originally read in the uncorrected proof, "Of course, Mumford has been faulted together with Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan and Friedrich Kittler...."
posted by Ben Peters at
00:04
1 Comments:
Hi Ben,
You have no idea how relieved I am to find such a contemporaneous discussion on the terminological use of "new media". I'm a Toronto-based artist-curator-student. I am currently doing an individual research topic
on theorizing new media art curation for a fourth year undergraduate Visual Culture
and Communication course at University of Toronto. Your article was the most recent and updated on the topic of new media's fallacious "newness" and new media (art and history) was something I have to define in order to contextualize current curatorial trends and challeges for new media art.
I would like to let you know I would cite this articles as part of my bibliography. If you're not comfortable with this please notify me.
Thanks for reading,
Jen.
Post a Comment
<< Home