The Decay-In-Storage
Room at the Einstein
College of Medicine
By George Hamawy and
Carl Passler
In
anticipation of the closing of the last remaining
radioactive waste burial site at Barnwell, S.C., to out-of-compact
waste, the Albert Einstein College of Medicine decided to start a
decay-in-storage room to handle its radioactive
waste. The college is a medical school, graduate school, and medical
research institution with approximately 400 research laboratories, of
which 140 use radioactive material for research. All the college's
affiliated hospitals are at different locations, and their radioactive
waste is handled separately.
|

Storage room before
operation
|

8 months later
|
The first task was to estimate the size of the area needed to handle
the radioactive waste, which, contrary to general belief, was found to
be relatively small. We also found that the accumulated waste volume
will reach a maximum size and stabilize at that level after an elapsed
period of approximately 3 years.
WASTE GENERATION
Our records indicated that during 1992 we had shipped for burial 100
drums (55 gallons or 7.5 feet
3 each) of compacted solid dry
waste.
That is 750 ft
3 of compacted solid dry waste. Since our
compaction
ratio was 2:1, the actual volume was 1500 ft
3. All
radioactive
liquid waste, excluding sink disposal and decay, was solidified and
treated as solid waste. The solidified liquid constituted about 5
percent of the dry solid waste. The liquid scintillation drums were
handled differently, and their disposal was not affected by the
Barnwell site closure.
The distribution of radioactivity by isotopes used in 1992 is shown in
table 1.
|
MAXIMUM VOLUME TO BE STORED
To estimate the size of the area required for sroring the radioactive
waste, we made the following assumptions.
- Isotope usage will continue at the same rate in the future.
- The annual volume of waste generated for each isotope is
proportional to the amount of activity during that period. Table 2
shows the annual volume of waste generated in 1992.
- We must store the waste being generated by the long-lived
isotopes carbon 14 and hydrogen 3 until an alternative method of
disposal is devised, sometime within the next 10 years.
- The waste is being successfully segregated by isotope.
-
After a storage period of 10
half-lives for each isotope, the waste can be considered nonradioactive
and can be removed from the waste area.
|
| Table 1 - Distribution of
Annual
Isotope Usage (1992) |
Isotope
|
Amount
(Ci)
|
Percentage
|
Phosphorus 32
|
1.84
|
43
|
Sulfur 35
|
1.10
|
26
|
Iodine 125
|
0.38
|
9
|
Chromium 51
|
0.35
|
8
|
Hydrogen 3
|
0.59
|
14
|
Carbon 14
|
0.02
|
<1
|
|
Because the minimum storage
period is 10
half-lives of the isotope being stored (set by article 175 of the New
York City Health Code), the maximum accumulated volume of waste to be
stored for each isotope is the amount that is being generated during
that period of time for each isotope. In other words, for
isotopes whose 10-half-life period is less than a year, the maximum
accumulated waste volume is less than the annual waste volume
generated. When that period is longer than a year, the maximum
accumulated waste volume is larger than the annual waste volume
generated. The maximum accumulated volume of waste for each isotope and
the aggregate amount, excluding the long-lived isotopes, are shown in figure 1.
The
waste generated by the
use of hydrogen 3 is largely in low-activity
liquid form, while the solid waste volume is small. A large percentage
of hydrogen 3 waste will be disposed of as liquid waste.
|
| Table 2 - Annual Volume of Solid Radioactive Waste
Generated by Isotope (1992)
|
Isotope
|
Volume of Waste (ft3)
|
Phosphorus 32
|
645
|
Sulfur 35
|
390
|
Iodine 125
|
135
|
Chromium 51
|
120
|
Total:
|
1290
|
|
The
long-lived solid waste (hydrogen 3 and carbon 14) will be compacted
and stored until a disposal site is established. The total volume of
this kind of long-lived waste is approximately one 55-gallon drum of
compacted dry solid waste annually.
AREA REQUIRED
The maximum accumulated waste volume was calculated to be 1880 cubic ft
(fig. 1).To estimate the size of the area that will be required to
store this amount of waste, we assumed the following conditions:
- The waste will be stored in boxes measuring 19 by 19 by 26
in. (approximately 5 ft3).
- The boxes will be stacked three high.
- The boxes will be in rows that are spaced to allow for
traffic and easy access.
If we stack the boxes three high to a height of 6.5 ft, the solid area
required is approximately 300 ft2. Since we require space
between
the rows, a conservative estimate would be to double the
solidarea to
a required storage area
of 600 ft2. |
Figure 1
|
LOCATION
The following criteria were used to select an appropriate location for
the storage room.
- The room must be centrally located for easy access from various
buildings of the college.
- The room must have easy access to the outside for shipping the
decayed waste.
- The room must be somewhat isolated from the busy traffic of
college personnel.
- The room must satisfy the size requirements and be in compliance
with all pertinent codes and regulations.
We investigated several available locations within the college and
selected a room in the basement of one of the buildings that meets all
the selection criteria. The dimensions of the room are approximately 30
by 17 ft.
ROOM PREPARATION
The storage room was prepared for accepring waste for decay by
implementing the following room modifications.
- An area monitor with an alarm system was installed inside the
room.
- The floor was covered by an enamel surface without seams.
- A sprinkler system was installed.
- A systemof pallets divided the room into different sections for
each isotope's waste storage.
- An elaborate system of recording waste information was devised,
The data are recorded both electronically and manually.
The room was prepared for rhe storage operation and began to accept
waste for decay in May 1994. The Barnwell burial site closed its
doors to waste from our New York area in June 1994.
WASTE COLLECTION
Segregated radioactive solid waste was collected from users and
transported to the decay-in-storage room. All pertinent information was
logged in, and the waste bags were inspected and packed in boxes.
Informational labels were
affixed to each box.
The storage period of 10 half-lives was calculated, and the date of
probable disposal was marked on a long-term wall calendar.
After the elapsed storage period, the boxes were checked for radiation,
and all the data on monitoring, inspection, and contents were kept for
reference. The box was then disposed of as nonradioactive waste
after the radiation safety officer's approval.
POSTOPERATION
Eight months after the start of the operation, the volumeof accumulated
radioactive waste ro be handled and stored in the storage room was even
smaller than anticipated (
figure 2).
Some of this volume reduction
was attributed to the following factors
- An intensive campaign was launched within the college for
minimizing radioactive waste generation.
- Laboratories were charged a fee for the use of the storage
room to encourage the minimization of waste.
- Laboratories were encouraged to store their short-lived
waste for
decay within their respective laboratories rather than in the storage
room. Several laboratories chose this option.
CONCLUSION
The first thought when considering a decay-in-storage room is that the
area required will be very large, but the actual size of the area is
relatively small. Excluding the long-lived radioactive waste, it
is
assumed that the volume of accumulated waste will increase gradually
and reach its maximum volume 3 years after the storage starting date
(the period required for sulfur 35 decay, the isotope with the longest
half-life of our decayable waste). After this elapsed period, the
total waste volume will remain stable with no appreciable increase, and
no additional storage area will be required.
|
Figure 2
|
The Authors
George Hamawy is the radiation safety officer at Albert Einstein
College of Medicine in the Bronx, New York. He received his
education at New York University and Hunter College and has been
working with radioactive materials for the last 25 years.
Carl Passler is the assistant radiation safety officer at Albert
Einstein College of Medicine. He received his training in the
U.S. Navy serving on a nuclear submarine for 6 years.