
programming classes at the Dearborn
Engine Plant?
First of all, it is said that
workers won't have to program a com-
puter, they will only have to operate
it. Thus computer classes need only
teach how to run a commercial com-
puter program. But the computer is
not a word processor or a spreadsheet
or a data base machine. Almost any
personal computer can be used in a
variety of ways. It can be used for
word processing, to run a CAD pro-
gram, to run a spreadsheet. It can be
used to run programmable controllers
or robots. It can be used to do type-
setting. To learn a particular ap-
plication is not necessarily helpful
in learning the flexible nature of
the computer. The personal computer
is an all purpose machine. It has
only begun to show its varied poten-
tial. But to utilize this machine,
you have to understand how it works
and how to get it to do what you
want. Thus you need to know how to
program it.
In the 1930's, some auto workers
in Flint, MI, had lathes in their
basements so they could become fam-
iliar with the operation of the ma-
chine and be able, therefore, to get
it to do what was needed at work. The
same goes for the personal computer.
The more you use it at home, the more
you will be able to understand how it
functions and be able to use it at
work. Some U.S. corporations seem to
believe they can control the com-
puter, so they are keeping workers
and schoolchildren from learning
programming. One company officials
told a mother his company didn't want
people learning programming. They
would teach whatever someone needed
to know. Also supervisors have said
they don't want workers typing in
programs, tying up the machines. And
maybe it is feared that if workers
learn to program they will change the
operation of a machine. But are
these fears realistic?
First of all, the computer is new.
People using computers will be run-
ning into new, unknown situations.
Management may claim they don't want
workers trying to deal with these
situations, they want PRODUCTION.
There are salary programmers. But
they can't write everything that
needs to be written, because they
can't do all the customizing that is
needed. To get production, management
will need workers on the shop floor
who are able to solve the day to day
problems that occur in the course of
operating the computers that are
being installed on the shop floor.
In the pre-computer era, someone
running a Keller machine needed to
know what cutters to use in what
areas, what direction to run in, how
to set the job up, the size of the
tracers, which cutters to use for
certain areas, when the job was done,
etc. It was only practical experience
that made it possible to run the
machines. Then numerical control
machines were introduced, which run
with paper tapes as programs. They
are often programmed by salary pro-
grammers at another location. But if
the cutter gets dull or hits screws
and dowels, or there's too much stock
or no stock (for example you can't
take off 4 inches of stock at one
time as you would break the cutter)
then the operator has to intervene in
the program and override it. Kellers,
now, are run by direct numerical con-
trol, rather than by paper tape. In
the past, there wasn't enough memory
storage to store the whole program at
one time to be able to edit it. Now
the operator can load the whole pro-
gram into the machine at one time to
run it. If the operator finds some-
thing is wrong, it is now possible to
edit the program and correct the
error. Therefore, it increases effi-
ciency for the operator to know how
to program the machine. Also, it is
more likely a worker who doesn't know
programming will make some mistake
that may interfere with the program
in a machine, while one who knows how
the machine operates and is equipped
to solve its problems may actually
improve the situation. It is workers
who keep machines running, and they
need certain necessary knowledge to
be able to do their work.
7