
clothed with the cover of "public
education." For the past 4 or 5 years
I have been trying to have this ille-
gal and unconstitutional situation
rectified. But I've gotten no where.
I am writing to you with regard to
this run around. I have uncovered the
refusal to undertake mandatory recov-
ery of misused public and federal
education funds on the part of the
State Department of Education, the
Attorney General and the Wayne County
Prosecutor's Office.
Under MCLA 21.47, you have the
power to remove public officials from
office who refuse to comply with the
obligation to recover misspent public
funds and to prosecute the public
officials involved. MCLA 21.47 says:
"Refusal or neglect to comply with
the requirements of this section on
the part of the attorney general, or
on the part of the prosecuting attor-
ney of any county in the state shall
be sufficient cause for his removal
from office by the governor." I am
requesting that your office begin an
immediate investigation into this
matter and take the necessary appro-
priate action with regard to the
mandatory recovery of misspent public
and federal education funds and to
penalize the public officials respon-
sible.
This illegal activity was origi-
nally brought to the attention of the
Attorney General's office in Decem-
ber, 1986, and to the attention of
the Wayne County Prosecutor's Office
on February 19, 1987. Subsequently,
these public officials were presented
with documentary evidence of the
admitted illegal payment of over
$20,000 of state aid and federal
funds to a union via the bills show-
ing the illegal payoff, as well as
the admission of the payoff in a
court suit filed by the Garden City
Public Schools in Wayne County Cir-
cuit Court 86-634695CZ. The Prosecu-
tor's office advised that this situa-
tion had to be dealt with by the
Attorney General's office. And the
Asst. Attorney General in charge of
Education insisted that it was neces-
sary to make a complaint to the State
Department of Education to get recti-
fication. He wrote: "If your claim is
that a school district improperly
expended public funds, you should
make that complaint in writing to the
Michigan Department of Education in
Lansing, Michigan, providing as much
documentation as possible. The Michi-
gan Department of Education will
inquire into your complaint, to the
extent it deems appropriate, and
share its review with this office."
(Letter from Gerald Young dated April
17, 1987)
In 1986, a complaint was initiated
with the State Department of Educa-
tion by talking with the Consultant
at the Wayne County Intermediate
School District about the problem. A
formal written complaint was submit-
ted in 1988. Thus far there has been
no report written detailing the alle-
gations nor showing any investigation
into them. In addition, there is now
over 800 pages of public testimony at
the Michigan Employment Relations
Commission in Case No. 86 K-291 ad-
mitting to the illegal use of public
funds. Both the Prosecutor of Wayne
County and the Attorney General of
Michigan have been informed of this
additional evidence. State Senator
Daniel DeGrow has written that he is
awaiting the report of the Attorney
General's office to take action in
the matter. In a letter dated March
1, 1990, he wrote, "As indicated in
my letter to you dated February 16,
1990, I am awaiting the outcome of
the investigation being conducted by
the Attorney General's Office. When
their report is complete, I will be
so advised and the appropriate action
will be taken at that time." (Letter
from Daniel DeGrow dated March 1,
1990)
In addition to the documented
illegal use of $20,000 of public
money, the Prosecutor of Wayne County
has acknowledged that approximately
$200,000 of public state aid and
federal funds have been used to sup-
port a nonpublic school at the Ford
Rouge Plant. Also, substantial public
funds are being used to subsidize
nonpublic schools at the Ford Motor
Company via the UAW-Ford National
Development and Training Center lo-
cated on public property at Henry
Ford Community College in Dearborn,
6