The Amateur
Computerist
Summer 1992 Volume 4 No. 4
“The long memory is the most radical idea in America.” Clara Sparks;
From album “Don’t Mourn-Organize: Songs of Labor” songwriter Joe Hill.
The Impact of the Computer
on Society: Two Views
Current Problems
I just finished reading the Amateur Computerist (vol. 4 no. 2-3) and
I am going to be the devil’s advocate with regard to your theory about
forcing high wages to encourage automation and result in labor reaping
the benefits of cost saving. It is an interesting theory but I see the need
for much related discussed of how it could be implemented. I can
foresee many problems in applying this theory. The major one being
how can you force industry to pay high wages? Currently unions are on
the wane due to the Internationalization of Industry and their ability to
move plants and to transfer jobs any place in the world. The experiences
of Greyhound and Caterpillar reflects the realities of our current
situation. The introduction of the computer has encouraged companies
to eliminate mid management and has helped industries to cut cost of
operation. How has this benefitted either labor or the consumer? It
appears that all mid managers are being effected either through loss of
jobs, insecurity and eventually those left working will probably get
lower pay. I would guess that it will also effect the pay of all labor.
I would suggest that your newsletter might be more meaningful if
Webpage: http://www.ais.org/~jrh/acn/
Page 1
you would encourage discussions on all aspects of our current problems.
The history of the Sit-downers is interesting from a historical perspec-
tive, but it’s important to us only if we can learn from this experience.
The situation today is much different from the days of the Sit-downers.
I suspect that there is not much that can be applied.
Table of Contents
Impact of the Computer on Society: First View. . . . . . . . . . . . Page 1
Impact of the Computer on Society: Second View. . . . . . . . . . Page 5
Electronic Mail.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 7
Letters to the Editor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 11
Desktop Publishing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 14
On the Question of Censorship. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 15
Computers for People: History Part IV. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 17
TRY THIS: (Programs). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 20
(From the Shop Floor) I’d Hate to Be a Foreman. . . . . . . . . . . Page 24
Caterpillar Worker on UAW-Cat Strike. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 25
OPEN ACCESS: America and the Dollar. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 35
Problem Corner. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 37
Interview with Staff Member.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Page 40
The other point that you keep projecting is that workers should be
computer literate to make automation practical. This is a real controver-
sial proposal. The attitude of industry is to keep workers away from
touching computer programs and/or repairing machinery. Most
companies employ specialists to do programming or to repair machinery
and they (try) to discourage all others from becoming involved. When
I worked in Europe I saw the results of allowing GI’s to mess with
computer programs, as it was often a disaster. It is my belief that this too
needs to be discussed in depth. I believe that workers should be
encouraged to upgrade their skills for promotions. I believe that only a
limited number of workers have the education or motivation to learn
Page 2
computer skills.
Further your comparison of the Computer Revolution with the
Industrial Revolution needs much further analysis. At the time of the
Industrial Revolution the standard of living was so low that it could not
drop further. Our current standard of living based upon historical
standards is probably the highest in history. The computer revolution
could cause our standard of living to drop drastically. It is my belief that
any theory regarding our future direction has to be explored in great
depth. People tend to be very dogmatic in their approaches and often
ignore reality. An excellent example of this approach is Socialism. It is
theoretically a better system but from a practical standpoint it hasn’t
worked. It failed because no realistic analysis was made of human greed
and no allowances were made to take care of this problem.
It is my feeling that if you really want a newsletter that is different,
encourage the in depth exploration of the effects of the Computer
Revolution on man. We can already see some of its effects on man but
many more are to come. An analysis of anticipated effects are certainly
in order, and what is more important is that we speculate on how we
could effectively have people apply pressure so that the computer is used
beneficially. I don’t know of any organized group who are actively
looking into these problems, other than the people whom have a direct
economic interest in exploiting the computer.
You can say that I am depressed about people, but a better word is
cynical. From what I can see most people are not interested in anything
but their immediate self. They only get excited when encouraged by the
newspapers and/or TV. Look at all the noise about Congress bouncing
checks. This is only the tip of the iceberg and is relatively unimportant
when compared to some of the other things that our representatives have
been doing. Traveling around the World at Taxpayers expense, the
Saving Bank scandals, the unfair tax bills, etc. Almost nobody gets
excited about these. I suspect that Bush may even be reelected, in spite
of the miserable state of our economy.
I know that there are people interested in doing something about
improving our current situation, but these are in the minority. What we
lack along with more interested people is a clear analysis of our
problems and leadership to direct solutions.
Page 3
My analysis of the basic reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union
is Corruption. The people that started the Soviet Union were idealists.
They initially accomplished much in that they introduced education,
medical support system and an initial improvement in the Standard of
Living. But even from the beginning the opportunists took over. They
became the factory manager, government official, party member, army
officer, etc. Once in power, most made every effort to maintain their
positions, bringing in friends, family and shunning people with ability
and integrity. This caused the eventual collapse of the system. We have
exactly the same problems in this country except for a minimal check
and balance system. When a company starts to lose money they
sometimes replace management and another check is the high level
fights among the power giants. Oil companies want high oil prices
whereas the airline, trucking and chemical industries want low oil prices.
With respect to Windows, I find it a mess to use. I have been
playing with it but I find it difficult to learn. It is slow, erratic and the
manuals and help menus are difficult to understand. The other reason I
have been playing with Windows is I have been getting some of the
latest software for Windows. I have MS Word, MS Works, Intermission
and many others. Also I recently installed Stacker which doubled the
capacity of my hard disk. I find this program great. I need Windows to
use this new software.
If you care to publish any of my comments you may. I believe that
you can easily extract them from this letter. Hopefully it might generate
some discussion, although I don’t feel too optimistic. The last letter of
mine which you published regarding the effect of the computer on man
apparently didn’t generate any discussion.
Dave Pollack
Sun City, ARIZONA
Page 4
The Future
If I should discuss “the future,” I would take, not a 10-20 year
perspective, but a 200 year perspective. I would ask myself: What is the
real LONG RANGE trend in the economy, and what sort of real LONG
RANGE target is made possible by that? Having decided on a 200 year
perspective, I would use that projection as a premise for the course I
would want society to follow in the more near future (0-10 years).
What then is the fundamental trend in the economy, seen from the
perspective of 200 years? The answer is of course trivial: An immense
increase in productivity. And I will say: We have just seen the start of
this, what with automated manufacturing, process control, expert
systems, and in the not-so-near-future, Artificial Intelligence. I disagree
with environmentalists saying that increased productivity is impossible
because of environmental constraints. I agree with their mental alarm
about the constraints, but I think that automation, robots, and so on will
make us a better society for all, at the same time REDUCING the strain
on the environment.
Now comes the next point, which is not trivial at all: What sort of
society should we strive for in the light of the enormous technological
potential that a
lot of us agree on?
Here is my scenario: A society where a small percentage of the
population oversee automatic processes in administration, manufacturing
and commerce. The industry will be running nearly without human
work-hours. So what do the other 95% do? Before I answer that
question, some thoughts about “the meaning of life”. Why do we need
industry? Is it an end in itself? (Listening to politicians and industrialists
in the media, one is led to believe that.)
In my view, industry is only a means TO GIVE PEOPLE MORE
TIME FOR WHAT THEY REALLY WOULD LIKE TO DO. The
remaining 95% of the workforce in my future society would have the
following jobs:
- Kindergarten teachers and nurses, 2 adults per 5 children
- Teachers, in classes with less than 10 children in each class
- Sailplane instructors, scuba-diving instructors, football trainers,
Page 5
- Teaching kids mountain-climbing
- Rearing horses
- Drama instructors, singing instructors, actors, singers, musicians,
painters, etc.
- Health personnel, one doctor per 50 persons. Free hospitalization for
everybody.
- Researchers in anything from flowers to chess to astronomy to
historical masks of the South American Indians. A very big part of the
population in university-level education and research. - ecologically
sound agriculture and animal husbandry, which, by the way, may be
MORE labor-intensive than today’s industrialized attack on the
environment.
- Ecological managing and rebuilding of the world. Reforestation is one
important example.
OK, you can see where I’m going. And I would also stress:
Mandatory work-hours in this society are in the range of 2 - 4 hours, if
they are mandatory at all. But people will be on the job a lot more,
because they will LIKE what they are doing. No problem.
This far future scenario has the following consequences for shorter-
term policies:
- Automation is a good thing
- Higher wages which lead to more automation is a good thing
- Shorter work hours accompanied by job-sharing is a good thing.
- Less people in industry and more people in education/health
care/culture is a good thing.
- More people employed taking care of other people - and this cannot
and should not be “automatized” - is a good thing. In countries with a
publicly financed health care and education, like my own country, this
means the public sector taking a BIGGER piece of the GNP. This, in my
view, is a sign of an advanced society, and I therefore find the persistent
wailing from industry, finance and the political right against growth in
the public sector totally reactionary and lacking any long term perspec-
tive.
Trond Andresen
Trondheim, Norway
Page 6
Electronic Mail
Subject: History
Yes, I’m always interested in articles referring to the history of
PCs. I’d greatly appreciate it if you could send me some copies. Also,
the history of the Amateur Computerist is of interest to me, as I often
find myself countering ideas of technological determinism. The Russians
I deal with seem to feel that IBM waved its magic wand and created the
personal computer!
Someone is putting together a multimedia history of the PC, and
I’ll refer him to you.
I’ve certainly heard of Cleveland Freenet, in my position with the
Community Memory Project. I believe that we’ve developed the next
generation of public-access bulletin board, which has been in service at
ten public locations in Berkeley since 1989. We haven’t done much
publicity, but that will soon change.
Lee Felsenstein
California
From: cmf851@cscgpo.anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: Computers vs Factory Closures: 4 Years of the Amateur
Computerist
Great Stuff!
Makes a refreshing change to read the classical POSITIVE stand
demanding more high-tech and blaming the capitalists for preferring low
wage speedup policies! It’s SO sickening reading the usual garbage
about how automation costs jobs and we should all work harder for
longer hours to produce less just so that a system based on “jobs” can
Page 7
survive (and to preserve nature instead of conquering it of course...)
An old friend of mine who is “almost” on the net used to be an auto
worker so I’m passing your stuff on.
Albert Langer
Australia
From: cmf851@cscgpo.anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: Computers vs Factory Closures: 4 Years of the Amateur
Computerist
Thanks for the complete issue. I just read it and really enjoyed it. I
like the mixture - and especially the re-capturing of the “radical
subversive” history of personal computing. Looking forward to future
issues.
Albert Langer
Australia
From: Lee Hauser
Got the Amateur Computerist loud and clear. I’m impressed!
Especially the history of the newsletter. You may know that we out here
in Washington State are a bit addled when it comes to labor causes – we
haven’t been called the “Soviet of Washington” back in the '30s for
nothing. Though I’m not personally a union type, the reasons for the
founding of your newsletter warmed my heart.
Anyway, back to work, thanks for the newsletter, and I’ll type at
you soon!
Lee Hauser
Washington
Page 8
From: “More Puzzled”
- ‘Cause I’m Still Learning
Subject: Re: The Rest Of The Story
Now before I write anything else I would like to say that I was very
sorry to hear about Mr. Floyd Hoke-Miller. I personally did not know
the man but I have a suspicion that I am for the lessor for not having met
him. As selfish as this may sound, who knows what I might have learned
if I had met him. Anyone that was a member of the “Wobblies” and the
“famous/infamous sit-down strike 1937,” no matter what their point
of view, is worth talking to. If I were a journalist I would have paid to
interview him. If there weren’t people like him all the workers might be
in slave camps today.
Before I forget this I should have mentioned this comment in my
last message. In reading how the Amateur Computerist was founded and
all of you ( the initiators ) should pat your self on the back. It can be
very tough to get something like this off the ground, let alone sustain it
for four years. And I was not surprised that Ford played games with the
educational future of the workers. I’m not familiar with them but
hopefully they have taken a different approach these days.
More Puzzled
Ohio
Subject: Ford/Amateur Computerist
I’m working on a book called The Age of Heretics, a history of
efforts to change corporations for the better over the past 20 years. I saw
your note about the effort by workers to make Ford put in more
computers, not less, and I’m fascinated. I saw something similar in the
early 1980s regarding robots.
You offered to reply about obtaining a copy. How can I obtain one?
Many thanks for your consideration.
Art Kleiner
Ohio
Page 9
Subject: Ford/Amateur Computerist
Thank you. I haven’t yet downloaded the E-mail will do so when
I log on with a non-Telnet access method. I look forward to it. Book is
probably a year or so away from completion. Its scope is big.
Re: robots, I noticed when visiting a Ford plant in early 1980s that
the shop floor people felt much more benevolently about the robots than
a casual visitor (or at least THIS casual visitor) expected.
Art Kleiner
Ohio
Subject: Re: Help with Placing Amateur Computerist in FTP Site
Sorry for the delayed response, I was out of town for a few days. I
am still interested in putting your newsletter in our collection. Please
send me the ASCII and WordPerfect files for the issue that you currently
have. Or if they are presently on an FTP server, please tell me where to
get them from. We’ll put them in our FTP server at world.std.com under
the subdirectory OBI for Online Book Initiative.
As you get the back issues online, please send them too. We’d
certainly like to have a complete set. Let me know if you need any
further assistance.
Mary Riendeau
Software Tool & Die
- Purveyors to the Trade
The World-Public Access UNIX
(617)739-0202
Page 10
Letters to the Editor
(Editor’s Note: We want to thank Eric Lindsay, Editor of µ Peripheral,
for helping us to track down information about the Educ-8, the Austra-
lian general purpose stored-program computer for home construction
which was announced and detailed in a series of articles in the magazine
Electronics Australia from August 1974 to August 1975. Not only did
Eric’s request for information lead to this interesting letter from Peter
Gargano, but also Eric sent us a copy of the original first edition 1975
handbook for constructing the Educ-8 (by Jamieson Rowe). A special
thanks to Eric and to Robert Bruce Kay-Sewall (who provided Eric with
the manual) and to Peter Garano for sending us the following letter.)
Regarding the EDUC-8 (pronounced “educate”) reference by Eric
Lindsay in the Feb 92 µ Peripheral, I have a soft cover handbook called
“EDUC-8 An educational microcomputer system for the home construc-
tor and college student” by Jamieson Rowe. My copy is the second
edition (1976) and the first edition was in 1975. Over 11,000 copies of
the first edition handbook were sold.
The current address of the editor of Electronics Australia (Jim
Rowe) is - Federal Publishing Company, PO Box 199, Alexandria NSW
2015, Australia.
The contents of the handbook (80 pages) were originally published
in Electronics Australia during the period August 1974 to August 1975.
The preface states: “..the project started out as a purely personal
challenge to design a small general-purpose digital computer ‘from
scratch’. Cost consideration were thus quite important in the original
design phase...”
Jim goes on to say he was able to take advantage of the rapidly
falling price of memory chips “...by redesigning the memory section
from 32-word capacity to a much more satisfying 256 words.”
Page 7 has a STOP PRESS indicating they received a July (1974)
copy of Radio-Electronics. They had the following to say: “...Our design
is not the first, then, as it transpires - we were beaten by a few weeks!”
Page 11
Regarding the specifications of the unit: “...Almost all processing
is performed serially at approximately 500kHz and 2Hz (test mode).
Instruction cycle times are constant at approximately 96 microseconds
and 24 seconds respectively...” (that’s about .01 MIP flat out)
The unit had a PC (Program Counter), AC (Accumulator), MA
(Memory Address register), MB (Memory Buffer register) and IR
(Instruction register). The front panel provided access to these registers
and memory. Power consumption of the basic unit was 15 watts. The
PCBs were single sided with a considerable number of links on the
component side.
After describing construction the later chapters introduce interfacing
the EDUC-8 to punched paper tape, a Philips 60SR printer, a full ASCII-
type input keyboard, teleprinters and even magnetic tape.
I have seen one of these units (briefly and a few years ago now) and
if I ever see one again I’ll negotiate with the owner. The first micro I
ever made was also described in Electronics Australia some time
between August 1976 and August 1977. This was the Mini Scamp, a 256
byte machine (2 x 2112) based on the National SC/MP.
Other Australian micros...
Some time later a self contained computer with integral video,
keyboard, power supply and speaker was designed around the Z80 and
described in another Australian magazine Electronics Today Interna-
tional. This computer, the MicroBee (not to be confused with a terminal
of the same name made by BeeHive in the U.S.) became a hit all over
Australia and was even exported to Sweden where their education
department made a large purchase. I even became involved with
manufacturing a small expansion board for the MicroBee with 256KB
RAM (a massive amount in the early 1980s), a disk controller and Z80
PIO and CTC.
Australia was one of the first manufacturers of a notebook computer
with a flip top 8 or 12 line LCD screen based on the Intel 186 and
running MS-DOS. This computer, originally called the DULMONT
MAGNUM was later repackaged for export as the Kookaburra (also an
Australian bird related to the Kingfisher family). I tried to buy one last
weekend at a trash-and-treasure market for $20 but the seller (who
obviously didn’t know the units real value) wanted $80!
Page 12
Looking through another magazine I noticed another article by Jim
Rowe that claims “...As far as we know this project is a world first-the
first electronics construction project based on a dedicated microcom-
puter.” The article describes an ASCII-Baudot translator using an
SC/MP evaluation kit. It appears the original article was in Electronics
Australia of October 1976 but it may have been earlier. Does this rate as
a world first?
If you are interested I can dredge up more facts on Australian
micros and if you really want I could get you a copy of the EDUC-8
handbook. It is a newsprint style, stapled publication with advertise-
ments. on the back and inside covers. It is copyrighted and “may not be
reproduced in whole or in part (..) without written permission from the
editor-in-chief of the editor of Electronics Australia”. I’m currently
working with small company that is manufacturing a 386SX based PC
that fits into the palm of your hand and is designed to be part of a multi
purpose laser ranging system. I don’t have an e-mail address but I’d like
to hear whether this info has been of any use.
Peter Gargano.
Aranda, Australia
(Editor’s Note: The 1975 manual - i.e. the first edition - contained
reprints of the articles that had been published from August
1974-August 1975. The first article describing the Educ-8 appears to
have been printed in the August 1974 issue of Electronics Australia.
This issue contains the following note that Peter referred to above:
“STOP PRESS Just as this issue was going to press an advance
copy of the July issue of the U.S. magazine Radio-Electronics reached
us. In it they give details of Mark-8, a minicomputer based around the
Intel 8008 microprocessor IC and 11101 memory ICs. Our design is not
the first, then, as it transpires we were beaten by a few weeks! Ah
well, such is life. Still, readers will now have a choice of two different
computer designs, each with rather different emphasis.”
(from Educ-8 by Jamieson Rowe, First Edition 1975)
(The µPeripheral is available from Eric Lindsay, 6 Hillcrest
Avenue, Faulconbridge, NSW, 2776, Australia. Electronic mail address:
Page 13
If any reader has a copy of the July 1974 article printed in Radio
Electronics describing the Mark-8 computer, we would appreciate
seeing a copy.)
Suggestion on
Desktop Publishing
Thanks for your letter of February 23
rd
. Sure, I’d be happy to help
you out with some suggestions on desktop publishing the Amateur
Computerist. Just keep in mind that I’m not an artist, so don’t expect
miracles. (You’ll probably have better ideas than I will!)
As to software, I really like Ventura Publisher, but it is a bit steep
in price. There are actually some much cheaper ways to get output that
is almost as good.
If you are starting from scratch, you may find something like
Publish It! (watch your pronunciation) a lot cheaper and almost as good.
I originally started with a few other programs like Fontasy and First
Publisher, but they were a disappointment. Publish It! would have
worked out quite well, except that I needed the ability to handle
equations and really long files; that’s why I move to Ventura at $800 (at
that time) instead of Publish It! at $100.
These days, of course, there is a lot of other software that will do an
almost-desktop-publishing job, like WordPerfect or Word for Windows.
As to a printer, again, if you are starting from scratch, a 4 page-per-
minute printer like an HP IIIP or an Oki or equivalent is nice, but an
even cheaper way may be a DeskJet from HP (I just don’t remember
offhand whether Publish It! supports it, but if not, then something else
will). Its output is almost as good as a laser printer, though slower (about
1-2 pages per minute); but that’s not really accurate. Laser printers slow
down a lot on graphics or when the software or computer driving them
is slow, so the final speed may be more or less the same. Ink Jet printers
like the DeskJet also have the disadvantage that the ink is water soluble
(though the newer DeskJet ink cartridges are better than the old ones in
Page 14
that respect). Which means you wouldn’t want to print envelopes in it.
But if you’re going to make more copies on a copier anyway, that may
not be a problem.
As to your other questions, I don’t have ready access to Internet, so
your e-mail address won’t help much, though I guess I could reach you
through CompuServe. I run a BBS here, but I doubt you want to call to
New York.
And yes, I’m the same Peter Stark who wrote those 68000 articles
for Radio-Electronics. I’ve been writing articles for years, including a
series of articles way back in the days of Kilobaud Magazine (1977, I
think), as well as a number of amateur radio magazines. If you still have
a copy of the issue that mentioned my R-E article, I’d appreciate it.
Peter Starks
Mt. Kisco, New York
Once Again
On the Question of Censorship
(Editor’s Note: See “Censorship.” Vol 4 no 1)
There they were, in all their black and white glory; those words that
the Morality Censors had deemed unfit for public viewing. “B*******”,
“a******”, “m***********” and all the others blared across the page,
swaggering in consonant-filled aggression. Just this once, freedom of
speech had triumphed over the censors. Their ideas were there for me,
the reader.
I flipped the page, leaving the entire article unread.
Was this freedom of information? Yes but the free information
censored the ideas more effectively than the editor’s policy of using
asterisks to suggest the words.
In spite of all the warnings to the contrary, we really DO tend to
judge “a book by its cover.” Poorly chosen words, racial epithets,
obscenities, and outright illiteracy can be more devastating to an idea
Page 15
than the hand of an editor. Who wants to wade through an article full of
misspellings? This leaves the impression that the writer is so illiterate
that they could have nothing useful to say to us. Any message that
includes the phrase “stupid male chauvinist pigs” is not going to reach
any man. Words like “kike, nigger, wetback, honky, whore” will only
appeal to those who have an axe to grind with these groups.
An editor’s concern is to preserve and present ideas. A good choice
of words can cause someone to look at an idea in a more favorable light.
The right words can cause them to consider an idea that they might
normally reject.
I feel that the editors made a call that the messages there were
more important than the language and that the ideas NEEDED to be
seen. They took a standard editorial policy of substituting letters in
words that many still find offensive. The words themselves added
nothing they were the same old tired adjectives, the limp and mindless
language of token aggression.
I think that editors have a responsibility to the freedom of informa-
tion that they cherish. Correcting spelling, correcting grammar, and yes
even putting symbols in offensive language are things that any good
editor does to make the ideas more presentable to a wide audience.
Are the words more important than the ideas? In poems and songs,
sense and content can be ignored for rhyme and meter. But if the goal is
to communicate ideas, then a little judicious editorial meddling may not
be as cruel as total freedom of language.
Mel White
Page 16
HISTORY OF COMPUTERS
Computers for the People:
A History
Part IV
(Continued from last issue)
The Homebrew Club movement had a vision. Computer power had
to be put into the hands of the people, otherwise, they cautioned,
computers would only be used against the populace. A cooperative,
critical milieu had to be created to oppose the secrecy and exclusivity of
IBM and the rest of the computer establishment. Money wasn’t the
objective of these technological revolutionaries. Their objective was to
contribute to the society they were part of. One Homebrew member’s
motto expressed the goal: “Let’s stand on each other’s shoulders, not on
each others toes.” (Paul Freiberger and Michael Swain, Fire in the
Valley, Berkeley, 1984, p. 178)
The Homebrew Club first met in Gordon French’s garage in Palo
Alto. But soon the meetings grew too large and the club moved to the
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center. Meetings would attract 500 to 750
people and Lee Felsenstein, who chaired the meetings, would encourage
questions and especially the sharing of information.
The free sharing of information was a crucial component of these
important and exciting days. The free exchange of information was a
necessity for those early personal computer pioneers who were all
working in unchartered territory.
The Homebrew club provided a place where a movement of people
could gather and find the help they needed to solve the problems posed
by this new technology. Also, Homebrewers shared their critiques of
new products being offered to warn each other of false claims or bugs
they encountered. Homebrew Club meetings were also a place where the
participants could share their reports of good products. The culture
developed by the Homebrewers supported the principle of open and free
exchange of ideas and information so achievements could be built on
and development could proceed in a cooperative rather than proprietary
Page 17
manner. “...In part due to Lee Felsenstein,” the authors of Fire in the
Valley write, “Homebrew encouraged the conviction that computers
should be used for and not against people.” (Ibid., p. 108)
The Club developed a set of principles that were argued out at
meetings. One principle was that there should be free dissemination of
software code and that information about the internal workings of a
computer should be open to everyone. They stood for open architecture,
and public knowledge of the physical design, as well as an open
operating system.
Most established companies, though, had the opposite view.
Companies like Intel wanted no standards set unless they were Intel’s
own standards, and MITS tried to hide the specifications of the
architecture of the Altair. Homebrew set up a standards subcommittee
to deal with the controversy. Freiberger and Swaine describe what
happened when the subcommittee met:
“When the subcommittee decided to formulate standards whether
Intel liked them or not, Intel acquiesced. This was outrageous cheek. A
bunch of hobbyists... had simply ignored the biggest microcomputer
company of that time and had faced the leading chip manufacturer and
not been struck by lightning.” (p. 122)
The authors go on to describe the process of the battle:
“The committee was attempting guerrilla design.... Tiny parameters
and other features were dictated by the companies. IBM and DEC
worked this way. In their way their method was certainly easier than
communal design. But the S-100 committee members dug into the
Roberts’ [Altair 8800 architecture - ed] bus, figured out how it worked,
and were scrapping it in favor of a new, independent bus open to all.”
(Ibid.)
Freiberger and Swaine explain, “This was a populist revolt against
the tyranny of the big company, and MITS hoisted as a poor but
adequate symbol of the big company. The revolution was succeeding.”
(p 123)
The Homebrewers had opened up the architecture of the machine,
but something more was needed to get the computer to the masses of the
people. People were hungry for computers but they wanted to be able to
see what they could do with computers themselves. To do so, they
Page 18
needed to be able to write programs, they needed a version of the BASIC
computer programming language that would make it possible for people
to use their computers for their own purposes. Kemeny and Kurtz at
Dartmouth had developed the BASIC programming language for the
Dartmouth Time Sharing System in the 1960's. BASIC was a language
which was easy for beginners to use, yet it also made it possible for
more advanced users to utilize the power of the computer. The version
of BASIC created by Paul Allen and Bill Gates ran on the Altair, so with
their early personal computer, users had access both to their own
computer and to the power a programming language made possible.
And along with the development of open architecture and operating
system and a language, another component was needed in the technolog-
ical guerrilla war. Critiques that honestly evaluated the products being
offered were crucial in the effort to develop useful and functioning
items. Freiberger and Swaine report of how this critical attitude was
nourished. In the Spring of 1975, Lee Felsenstein wrote articles on the
Altair for the Bay Area computer magazine PC. Relying on information
he received from telephone conversation with Ed Roberts, he wrote
about the Altair. Readers of the magazine, however, who bought Altairs
found bugs when trying to use the computer. Their letters complaining
about the problems they encountered flooded the editors of the maga-
zine. Freiberger and Swain describe Lee Felsenstein’s response, “In a
PCC article he titled `Criticism and Self-Criticism,’ Felsenstein then
apologized: `I lied folks; this thing has problems.’ He detailed the
computer’s flaws and how to correct them. He also began fixing Altairs
for friends and PCC readers, working on them in his half of the garage.
Loyal to other hobbyists and feeling guilty about misinforming people,
Felsenstein did the work cheaply. In the process, he learned a great deal
about those early Altairs.” (p 109 Fire)
Also, Ted Nelson’s Computer Lib contained concrete criticism of
IBM’s management practices that were antithetical to the free flow of
ideas needed for technological development.( See “The Behemoth IBM”,
“The Good News and the Bad News About IBM”, “Quickie History of
IBM, and “The Big Questions” “IBM’s Control: The Virtual Mechan-
ics”, etc., pg 52-55 of Computer Lib)
Soon critiques began appearing evaluating the new products and
Page 19
criticizing those practices and products that were dishonest and harmful
to the movement. Adam Osborne’s columns appearing in Interface Age
to begin with and later in Infoworld indicted companies that misled their
customers. He exposed dishonest practices such as companies who used
the money from a prematurely announced product to finance the
production and distribution of their products. “Silicon Valley, “write the
authors of Fire in the Valley,” was the source of his information and he
called his column `From the Fountainhead’.” (Ibid., p. 260)
(To be continued next issue)
TRY THIS
Faces (for IBM)
5 REM Just the Beginning!
7 GOSUB 160
10 PRINT “My name is happy face - see? :-)”
17 GOSUB 160
20 PRINT “My name is sad face - see? :-(”
27 GOSUB 160
30 PRINT “My name is mad face - see? :-O”
37 GOSUB 160
40 PRINT”My name is winky face - see? ;-)”
47 GOSUB 160
50 PRINT “My name is small happy - see? :)”
57 GOSUB 160
60 PRINT “My name is bracket - see? :-]”
67 GOSUB 160
70 PRINT “My name is cry baby - see? :~-(”
77 GOSUB 160
80 PRINT “My name is weird eye - see? =-)”
87 GOSUB 160
90 PRINT “My name is small weird eye =)”
97 GOSUB 160
100 PRINT” happy face :-)”
107 GOSUB 160
110 PRINT “happy face :-)”
117 GOSUB 160
150 END
Page 20
160 FOR X = 1 TO 2500: NEXT X
165 CLS
166 FOR T=1 TO 900: NEXT T
167 LOCATE 15,25
170 RETURN
Magic Square
* The following four lines are the ‘obfuscated’ version
* of the program below. Both versions print a magic
* square of odd size. The size must be an odd number,
* given as the first argument on the command line. If no
* argument is given, the size will default to 1. No
* argument checking is further done however.
*/
#if 0 /* Don’t let the compiler touch this one ... */
main(o,O0)char**O0;{int OO,O;O=--o?atoi(O0[!0]):!
0;for(o=((OO=O*O)-O+!0+!0)>>!0;OO;o+=((--OO%O)?-!
0:((((o-!0)%O)?O:0)+!0))-(((o-!0)%O)?O:0)){printf
(“\n%*d “+!!(OO%O),!0<<!0<<!0,o+=(o<!0)?O*O:0);}}
#endif
#include <stdio.h> /* Needed for the printf() func */
/*
* Below is the non-obfuscated version
* of the same algorithm.
*/
main(argc, argv)
int argc;
char *argv[];
{
int n = 1; /* Default square size */
int row; /* Loops over square */
int col;
int num; /* Current cell value */
Page 21
if (argc > 1) /* Argument given? */
n= atoi(argv[1]); /* Grab argument */
num= (n*n-n+2)/2; /* Top left square */
for (row = 1; row <= n; row++) /* For all rows ... */
for (col= 1; col <= n; col++) { /* For all columns */
printf(“%d “, num); /* Print current square */
if (col != n) { /* Not on last column? */
if (num%n == 1) /* Subtract one allowed? */
num--;
else /* Next diagonal */
num-= (n+1);
if (num < 1) /* Adjust for wrap around */
num+= n*n;
}
else { /* Last column reached */
num++; /* Adjust for new row */
printf(“\n”);
}
}
return 0; /* Just to be conformant */
} /* main */
If you notice carefully, this little thingy reads the command line. It
wants an odd number as its single argument; if not present, this number
will default to one (1). It prints a magic square of the size given.
In your case, since you didn’t supply it with an argument, it always
printed a single ‘1,’ which is an odd sized magic square by default.
Unless other implementations, this thingy doesn’t need any storage
proportional to the size of the magic square, i.e. no two dimensional
array to store the magic square.
The algorithm works as follows:
Page 22
- the number 1 to n^2 are stored in a square such that the sum of the all
rows, columns and the two diagonals are equal. Simple calculations
show that this sum equals (n^3+n)/2
- The number in the middle position of the square equals (n^2+1)/2
- Therefore the number in the top left position equals (n^2+1)/2+(n-1)/2
- Observation of the magic square shows that the next number in a row
is one less than the previous, unless the previous number was 0 mod n.
In this case the next number in the row is n-1 less than the previous
number mod n.
- the first number in the next row is 1 more than the last number in the
previous row.
The classical way of constructing an odd sized magic square is:
- put a one in the last column of the middle row.
- repeat the following steps:
- move one position to the right and one down. If you ‘fall off’ the
square: wrap around, i.e. consider the square as an unfolded torus.
- if the cell is free, put the next number there, otherwise move one
position to the left and put the number there
- until all positions are occupied.
My implementation is a variation of the last method described
above, it simply eliminates the need for an array, no more no less.
Enjoy!
kind regards,
Jos Horsmeier
Rotterdam, Netherlands
Page 23
NEWS & VIEWS
From the Shop Floor
I’d Hate to Be a Foreman
by Floyd Hoke-Miller
A foreman I would hate to be
And have the men look down on me
As something short of dignity
Without a conscience, heart or soul.
When every time I turned my back
There’d always be some dirty crack
About the scruples that I lack
And never a word to extol.
I don’t like words unfit for use,
Nor tongues of scorn that hates induce
But still there is a sane excuse
When used against some mad Legree.
Who drives his men at fearful pace
As if it were a chariot race
And by all odds he’d save his face
And win the victory.
To aspire, I never can,
To exploit my fellow man
For Mammon’s parasitic clan;
That ever lies in Luxurys lap.
That’s why I wait to see the day
When none can rise and boastful say
“I gained my lot the easy way
By shearing the working sap.”
Page 24
COMMENTS FROM A CATERPILLAR
WORKER ON UAW-CAT STRIKE
(Editor’s Note: The following posts were part of an Open Forum
Discussion about the 5 month strike of UAW members against Caterpil-
lar Corporation which was ended when the International Union ordered
workers back to work. There is a Freenet Computer Bulletin in Peoria,
Illinois where workers, managers and other interested people discussed
and debated issues of the strike both during and after the 5 month
walkout. We are reproducing some of the comments of a Caterpillar
worker which were part of the Freenet CAT-UAW Open Forum. The
worker’s viewpoint is rarely heard in the U.S. Lines marked with “>” are
being quoted from another person’s post in the forum.)
From:
Subject: RESPECT
It has been some time since I last visited Heartland... I grew weary
of the argument I guess. I was also disheartened that there were so few
Cat workers available to comment on our perspective of this issue.
This August I will have spent 19 years in the factories. I think the
sorriest part of this entire situation is the distrust and lack of respect that
has grown over the last decade. Distrust and disrespect do not build
cooperation. I am afraid Cat’s latest antics have buried that hope for
good. I know they have for me. I could care less if Cat died tomorrow.
There is no way I can explain the feelings I had on the picket line,
watching hired security “people” videotape my moves. I did NOT feel
protected. Receiving propaganda at my home only made me curious
where the money was coming from for all the postage. The same with
the radio, TV, and newspaper nonsense. I was not convinced Cat valued
me.
It is my perspective that most of this conflict has been caused by
Cat’s callous treatment of its employees. There must be more to any
working relationship than money and benefits. Over the years I have
Page 25
tried to give the company full measure for my employment. I have come
forth with my ideas and seen things improved because of them. Never
again. If I am but a physical body to be replaced indiscriminately, than
so be it. I will be the machine they wish to employ. I have no ideas of
value. I realize the following analogy is somewhat crude... but it closely
parallels the feeling of many of Cat’s hourly workers.
A person, man or woman, desires companionship. This person has
a variety of choices, but let us say basically there are only two. One can
buy companionship or mutually share it... each benefitting from the
other. One can chose to find a mate, and build a life around that
decision. To share the good and bad, to trust and benefit from that trust.
Or one can buy limited companionship to fulfill immediate needs and
walk away with no ties or responsibility. It is my view that Caterpillar
has decided to forgo the benefit of trust and long term relationship.
Caterpillar has used myself and fellow workers as prostitutes to be
discarded. So be it.
Michael Legel
Subject: Install?
>This is a time of change. MUCH is happening,
>hopefully for the ultimate good. Much does not
>SEEM good now, however, and this perception is
>widespread. Rest assured that upper management is
>aware of this feeling; they simply do not know how
>to ameliorate it and yet install the changes that they
>feel must be made if we, as a company, are to be
>positioned to compete in the future.
I doubt if you are aware of what this paragraph tells me. Even in an
attempt of perhaps honest sympathy... you insult the point I try to make.
“upper management is aware of this feeling... and yet INSTALL THE
CHANGES that THEY feel must be made”? I guess they are not then
aware of our feelings are they? Or they are and simply don’t think it
Page 26
important enough to cooperate. I am NOT livestock, furniture, or
machinery and have no wish to have my changes INSTALLED. I was
once PART OF the company. Now, I have been reduced to a number. A
cost. A squiggle on a graph.
Michael Legel
Subject: Wait?...Hope?
>Nothing happens overnight. Change creates pain,
>yes, but it also can create lasting value for all of us.
>This is the time of change, and the pain - at least
>some of it - is inevitable and is felt by all. I can only
>ask that you remain open to perceive the hoped-for
>benefits as they arrive, and that you at least retain the
>hope that they will arrive. Perhaps we will see
>ourselves wedded as a company again. No one wants
>the “prostitute” attitude that you imply is your only
>choice left. I *could* say the same, but retain the
>hope.
Fool me once... shame on you... Fool me twice?
Not a decade ago Cat instigated a 7 month strike that wiped me out
financially, provided the catalyst to end my first marriage and ripped my
career from me as callously as the wings from a fly. After that strike, I
was bumped from pillar to post, from one shift to another, from one
plant to another. It took nearly 5 years to let bygones be bygones... to get
on with my life and hope for a better day.
During the ensuing years I gave up wages and benefits while top
management continued to increase their percentage of wage and benefit
compared to mine. I gave up a part of my COLA so that Cat could
retrain all of us poor souls they uprooted and we got little or no training.
I watched the working class numbers dwindle while the white collar
work force remained the same or increased. I participated in ESP and
other “volunteer” functions for the betterment of Cat with no further
Page 27
recompense to myself. I and my fellow workers endured the cutbacks
and watched some of our friends leave for good. We made the sacrifices.
We waited. We hoped. Still, we had no strikes... the contracts were
settled with little conflict and that gave us some small hope.
February, 1991, Cat started the ad campaign humiliating its hourly
employees among their communities, family and friends. They mailed
letters, sometimes 3 a week, each one worded to make me feel guilty for
wanting to share in Cat’s success. Vance Security showed up with their
riot gear and swaggered about the facilities in their bloused pants and
combat bats to “protect” us. Just like they “protected” the workers of
Pittston Coal? Right.
Before I ever hit the picket line, the small coal of resentment from
years past had blazed into pure hatred for the company I had once been
proud to work at. The final indignity was the permanent replacement
issue. Caterpillar knowingly used us as pawns in this ridiculous battle to
remove the union. By what stretch of the imagination could they ever
believe I and my fellow workers would not remember these indignities
for the rest of our lives. I meant what I said. I have no regard for
Caterpillar.
Michael Legel
Subject: Re: Wait?...Hope?
>You say “Or they are [aware of your feelings] and
>simply don’t think it important enough to cooper-
>ate.” It is only a confusion of thought that could
>cause you, in this country, to suggest that the owners
>represented by upper management have a duty “to
>cooperate” with you or with me. It is WE who have
>the duty to cooperate with THEM if we value our
>positions.
Interesting concept of the word “cooperate”. Your view mandates
that management is always correct by virtue of simply stating “Make it
so.” My view is one where the flow of information and responsibility
Page 28
move in all directions... each one advising in those areas at which they
are most competent and decisions made based upon the collective
knowledge of all involved. Your attitude seems to reflect that of the
greater Caterpillar mind-set. Your employees are simply employees who
have no stake in what decisions are made. Yet you rankle at our
deserved displeasure in this arrangement. I don’t think it is a “duty” for
managers to cooperate, but it would seem to be common sense to me. I
certainly don’t see what Caterpillar has gained by the current way of
going about it.
>I am sorry you feel the way you do. I can only say
>that *I* feel that you have been sold a bill of goods
>by the union leadership which *claims* to represent
>you while, in reality, only representing itself and
>their own continuance. You certainly have no
>understanding at all of what management has suf-
>fered during these years; a lack of understanding that
>I *know* has been fostered by union misrepresenta-
>tions. Based on this, I strongly suggest you reexam-
>ine your thinking as to what factors *caused* these
>two long strikes.
An another common thread of PR sound bites. The Detroit Union
this and the Detroit Union that. I was not quoting the union, but my own
personal observations over the course of nearly 2 decades. I do have a
mind and am fully capable of independent thought process. My identity
is no more determined by the union I belong to than the company I work
for. I get rather tired of being told who is leading me where. I make my
own decisions based upon what I want in life and what price I am
willing to pay to attain those wants. I will admit you brought something
to my attention I was not aware of: The suffering of management? How
many thousand in the exempt payroll have been indefinitely laid off?
>You also say that the ad and mail campaign made
>you feel guilty for wanting to share in Cat’s success.
>How sad. You felt guilty for wanting to share what
Page 29
>was not in being. You easily forget: we have been
>losing money. Hardly success. Potential, yes;
>success, no.
My statement was worded exactly as follows:
“They mailed letters, sometimes 3 a week, each one worded to make me
feel guilty for wanting to share in Cat’s success.” Do not construe that
the cleverly worded psycho babble sent to my home made me feel
guilty. I simply recognized the wording was designed to induce guilt, to
convince me I should be utterly grateful for any tidbit Cat might deign
to throw my way. I notice you and Caterpillar use the word WE in an
inclusive sense only when it suits you. If WE aren’t making profits, why
don’t WE sacrifice equally and which side of the WE made the
unprofitable decisions?
Michael Legel
Subject: Training
>For example, you gave up part of your COLA.
>Management gave it all up. YOU received little or
>no retraining. Perhaps not, or perhaps you did not
>recognize it all. I am in possession of sufficient data
>to know a whole lot of it went on. Question: Did
>you remain on the same job all of those years,
>running the same machine? You inferred you did
>not. If there was change, SOME retraining must have
>gone on for you to become proficient at the new one.
>Each time. Each time, SOMEONE took valuable
>time to show you the ropes.
I’m sure you have data that shows time was charged against
accounts for training purposes. What is not obvious by that data is the
quality and usefulness of the training. By and large, Caterpillar shop
training falls into one of 3 categories: Hourly employees training other
hourly employees in the jobs they are about to leave. Training sessions
Page 30
purchased along with new equipment from the equipment maker or
retailer. Classroom type instruction from Caterpillar staff personnel.
Over the years I have usually been “trained” by the man I was
replacing. I was allowed at most two weeks to absorb whatever
information the person was willing to share with me. If the man was
being promoted, I got a fair “break in”. If he had just been laid off, I was
on my own. He was not too interested in training the person taking his
job from him. At best, this type of training is limited to the skills of the
replaced person and if moves are made within months of each other,
there are only a few months skills developed to pass on. No continuity.
No training. Factory training can be helpful if the purchased machinery
has not been altered beyond the instructors experience. Often times
Caterpillar has need of specialized machinery for which there is no solid
experience to train from. There are even times the instructor is dubious
about what it is that we are trying to do with the machine. So, we all
learn together if we learn anything at all. Again, a learning process; but
no “training”. Classroom instruction, by and large, is useless. The
majority are taught by highly educated people with lots of book
knowledge and little or no actual shop experience. There is no “hands
on” training and most of us consider it a waste of time. The other type
is the coolant or tooling “salesman” and these “training sessions” usually
amount to hour long commercials rather than actual useful knowledge.
The most important factor to keep in mind about all of this is that
it is not the trainer who is responsible for results. It is the trainee. He is
expected to quickly adapt and start producing or he risks downgrade. He
therefore must train himself by experimentation or find a mentor who
will take time from his own duties to help. Unfortunately, management
personnel often don’t even know how to turn the machine on and are of
no help at all. They just want results. Rightfully so, as they are not in-
structors either and have been charged with producing finished parts.
They may sympathize, but they won’t put their neck in a noose if you
have problems. Caterpillar is in desperate need of an organized, effective
training system with competent personnel who can provide the continu-
ity necessary in training new personnel or developing new processes.
The present “pass it on down” system is antiquated and ineffectual with
the fast pace of current changes. It should not be the responsibility of the
Page 31
lowest rung on the ladder to insure adequate training. Especially when
he is contributing monetarily to the training he expected to get... and
didn’t. It was our belief that Cat intended to improve the system. It has
not improved.
Michael Legel
Subject: RE: Training
>NO ONE TRAINED ME! When I did get a job, I
>had to learn another new skill set. I LEARNED. NO
>ONE TRAINED ME! Why do you people with a
>high school degree and/or a few courses at ICC, or
>an associate’s degree, think it is your GOD given
>right to be trained at someone else’s expense? I
>PAID FOR MY TRAINING IN $ and IN TIME.
>You are not special because you CHOSE not to
>continue YOUR OWN TRAINING. Stop wining,
>take charge of your own life.
The context of the training issue was in regard to the worker’s
agreement to forgo an amount of hourly wage. This money was placed
in a training fund for our benefit. We do not expect something for
nothing. Every hour we work, an amount of money is put into this fund
rather than into our paycheck. I did not deny that a certain amount of
training is ongoing, but that it was not as applicable as it could be. I was
then informed I was not intelligent enough to realize when I was being
trained, so I tried to explain what Caterpillar training entails. I don’t
have to recognize it because I am told on these occasions so I will
charge my time to the proper timekeeping account. Again, the workers
are paying a significant amount for training which they are not satisfied
with.
>No one has to train you. If you are being paid, it is
>your responsibility to earn your wages. Just do it.
>Act grown up and take responsibility for your own
Page 32
>life.
The theme of your message assumes that anyone can walk up and
run a complex machining center without training. This is no more true
than if I were to state I could do your job without training. If a person
chose to attain this experience independently, I don’t know where it
would be done. Caterpillar is the only place I know where one can learn
to machine the large and complex parts of construction
The workers of Caterpillar are not as ignorant as people think they
are. This stereotype is an injustice to them. Most are good, hardworking
people who have no wish to be placed in this spotlight.
Michael Legel
Subject: Options
I had an incident recently at work that might highlight my differ-
ence with Caterpillar’s view of “cooperation”.
Another worker and I were told we were to “hand cut clearances”
on some noise abatement panels. These panels were about the size of the
average card table top and were made of a plastic and foam material. We
were taken to an open area in the middle of the shop where the night
shift had already been cutting on these panels. There were two fans
aimed at the work table. There was a fine layer of dust all around the
area. My first question was, “What is this material”. My foreman replied
he did not know. I asked him if it was appropriate that the dust be
allowed to contaminate the air and was it a hazard. To his credit he did
agree that we should do the work under an exhaust fan and directed us
to move to such an area. He told us to get to work and he would get
answers from the Safety Dept. I again told him I would not feel
comfortable working with the material until I knew what it was I was
working with. He became angry and said, “You know your options!” I
asked him what those options were and he stated I could go to work as
ordered or go home. Fortunately, others in the area convinced him that
it was not right to force us to work with possibly hazardous material
without the proper precautions. Without their support I was liable for
disciplinary action for “insubordination”. A short while later, my
Page 33
foreman brought the building manager with him as well as the safety
personnel to inform us of the material’s composition and what precau-
tions were required to work with it. He continued to be confrontational
and accused me of not being “cooperative”. I reminded him that it was
not I that had made any ultimatums or rash statements. It was not I that
had lost my temper and allowed it to rule. He immediately tried to
apologize for losing his temper and was visibly concerned that I had
brought this up in front of his boss. His boss felt that the apology was
sufficient. Had I lost my temper and treated him with such disrespect, I
could have apologized all the way out the door for what good it would
have done me. The double standard is alive and well at Caterpillar. If
disciplinary action is warranted for one, it is warranted for another for
the same offense. This foreman now knows that he can lose his temper,
make ultimatums etc. and fear no reprisal for these negative traits.
Michael Legel
Page 34
OPEN ACCESS
(Editor’s Note: We welcome views from the shop floor on all subjects
facing workers and we invite opposing views.)
America And The Dollar
By: Tim Hendrickson
The Symbol of Freedom we display in our Country is sometimes not
so easy to understand for the individual who can’t find a job. We are tied
Page 35
to the downfall of an anchor sinking slowly, then faster as the weight
defeats the buoyancy of the water trying to hold it up. We the people of
the United States of America have found ourselves without that
buoyancy to defeat the weight of the High Tax Dollar spending of
Congress, the increase in weight of higher insurance rates, Doctors who
see only a Dollar walk through their office doors, and not the patient.
The past sixty years of Cancer study has produced very little in the cure
for it. But you only have to stop and think, ...if they find the cures for the
Cancer? What happens then to the millions of dollars for the treatment
of cancer patients? We see the Industries increasing the price of the
product, without an increase to the workers. The weight is heavier
everyday. How much longer can we stay afloat? Water (The people of
this Country) the stream is drying up after five hundred years. We the
people cannot support the weight of the anchor much longer. The
average wage earner pays more in taxes, than most of the rich. This
country was not founded on the backs of the rich, but the working
people. Once the water has lost its buoyancy, nothing will float. Not
even a check!.... The greed for the dollar is when men go beyond the
limits of reason. When they fail to realize that dollars are made for the
rich by the sweat of the working man’s back. Nothing is gained without
effort. And who puts forth the effort?
The Dollar... it means more than friendship, or a helping hand.
More than the correct diagnosis from a doctor, or the truth about the
mechanics of your car. More than honest government, city, state, or
federal... especially when they use our tax dollars to build factories, and
businesses in foreign countries for the super rich.
Just for the Dollar we charge 200% and higher for health care, and
medicine for the elderly and poor. Just for the Dollar, we suck the oil
out of the ground, and pollute the water and air. Just for the Dollar, we
build nuclear plants that cost 10 to 20 times more than hydro-electric
dams, that won’t produce nuclear waste. Just for the Dollar, we flood
our country with foreign goods produced by slave child labor to make
the rich richer. Just for the Dollar, we drown our society in drugs, that
has only one end. Just for the Dollar, we sell our talents, and technology
to other countries, to ensure that our children and grandchildren will not
enjoy the same life style we have. Just for the Dollar, we sold our amber
Page 36
waves of grain, and tore down our purple mountains of majesty, just for
the ore, and minerals beneath them. Just for the Dollar, we covered our
fruited plains with highways, concrete, and rusted steel. Just for the
Dollar, we see our seas of shining oil slicks to oil slicks... Just for a
Dollar, we’ll sell America... Just for a Dollar... Just for a Dollar....
Problem Corner
(Editor’s Note: See vol.4 no. 2-3, “Puzzled”)
From: More Puzzled
Subject: Please Send This To Puzzled
Here is the best answer I have seen to the problem that “Puzzled”
is having with high density drives and their ability to read DD and HD
type of floppy disks. As a matter of fact when I posted this question the
first time I was sure that the person who provides this answer was going
to do so but as you read further you will see why he chose not to. I have
seen answers to other questions posted by him before and I believe him
to be one of the best. (Just my opinion)
By the way, you were right, the other answers did not quite cover
the problem “Puzzled” was having. Hope this is of some help:
To: Frederick O. Jacobson
Subject: Sorry To Trouble You But
I hope you don’t mind my asking you for just a little bit of help. If
you are busy and unable to answer this, no offense taken.
Here’s what happened. I posted the following on the Q & A section
of the IBM-PC SIG:
“I was reading The Amateur Computerist and I saw this question
and would like to know the answer if you have some time to answer it.”
First, here’s the question:
“A reader had upgraded their XT computer by installing high
Page 37
density floppy drives in both bays. When he/she puts 360KB or 720KB
diskettes into the drives the computer will not read them unless it is
rebooted. And if he/she does reboot and gets their computer to success-
fully read the 360KB or the 720KB diskette, they then have to reboot the
computer before it will read a high density disk.” (I did a lot of para-
phrasing here.)
Now, I ask whether one could set the parameters for their floppy
drives to read both high density and double density disks? I’m sure I saw
an answer contained in articles 1896-1898, and 1903 that indicated a
user could set one of the drives to format HD and DD disks . Presuming
this is possible, then that drive should also be able to read both types of
disks or have I overlooked something here?
Thanks, More Puzzled
Now what would be the correct syntax that would instruct the user’s
computer drives ( both of them , I think this possible) to read both type
of disks?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks Again, More Puzzled
From: Frederick O. Jacobson
Subject: RE: Sorry To Trouble You But
I saw that post when it appeared in the IBM SIG and declined to
answer it because I wasn’t certain my answer would be correct. What
follows is my best opinion, but that doesn’t mean it is necessarily
correct.
While I do installations like the one mentioned, I have never run
into the problem described.
In the case of the troublesome computer, I believe the installation
must have been defective.
A HD drive, whether 1.2 or 1.44 meg, should read DD disks without
any fuss. A 1.2 Meg drive should format a 360KB disk by using the
syntax “Format A: /4" (without the quotation marks of course). I’m not
positive of the syntax to format a 720KB disk in a 1.44 Meg drive(never
had the occasion to do it), but I presume “Format A: /2" or something
like that should do it.
A HD drive is not intended to modify DD disks which already have
Page 38
data on them. If one has a DD disk which already has data on it, he
should treat that disk in a “read only” manner. If you write to a DD disk
that has existing data on it, a 360KB or 720KB drive will never again be
able to read it. Think about it. The width of the track produced by a HD
drive is more narrow than that produced by a DD drive. Thus, if you
overwrite data already on such a disk, you do not overwrite the entire
width of the track. When a DD drive attempts to read it, the drive sees
part of the old data and part of the new data. Similarly, because of even
very slight difference in alignment between HD drives, a second HD
drive probably will also receive part old data and part new data.
The only reasons to read or write to a DD disk with a HD drive are
(1) To put a program on a hard disk which was furnished on DD disks,
and (2) To take data off a hard drive with a HD drive so it can be read
by a DD drive, such as frequently happens when one has a 386 computer
at the office and an XT at home.
Now then:
* A HD drive should *never* be used to *modify* data on a DD disk.
If you do, chances are pretty good that *no* drive will be able to read
the DD disk - perhaps not even the drive that was used to modify it.
* If you must use a HD drive to write to a DD disk, you must *never*
use a DD disk that has *ever* been written to before. In other words,
you must use a *new* disk, *never* a previously used disk. If you
attempt to format a previously used disk, the HD disk is incapable of
performing the task. Sections of tracks that were written with a DD disk
will not be overwritten by the format, and spurious data will remain on
the disk. This spurious data will prevent the disk from being reliable –
perhaps even in the HD drive you used to format it.
I have heard of *many* HD drives that will not format 360KB disks
correctly. I don’t know the reason for that, because I have never been
asked to correct a problem like that. When I install a HD disk, I
*always* check it to be sure it will read a DD disk. Perhaps my
installations succeed because I know how to set the jumpers on the cards
and drives. Not all service people know that, by any means.
Probably jumpers were positioned incorrectly on the controller card,
floppy drives, or both. Or it may be a quirk in the specific ROMs in the
computer. Keep in mind that the XT class machine wasn’t designed to
Page 39
use HD drives; those are aftermarket devices.
Please remember that the information in this answer is partially
from knowledge and partially from speculation. It may not be 100%
accurate.
Fred Jacobson
(Editor’s Note: As a rule of thumb – high density drives should not be
used to write data to double density disks to be read by double density
drives. Remember, what works in one situation does not work in every
situation. So if it does work, good, but remember it is not necessarily
guaranteed to work. Generally there are fewer problems with newer
equipment.)
Interview with Staff Member on the
Occasion of the 10
th
Anniversary
of the Personal Computer
Part II
(Editor’s Note: This concludes the interview begun in vol 4 no. 2. What
started primarily as an interview, which was printed as Part I, developed
into more of a free form discussion about the present and future of
computers.)
Ronda: Do you think there are any lessons from what is going on?
Michael: Well, the Timex/ Sinclair Commodore agreement was
proof that the best choice is not always for the best. The best product
does not always end up being marketed or sold. That seems true of many
things in this capitalist world. Sony’s Beta video system was
technologically more superior to the current VHS standard. I don’t know
if there is a lesson to draw or not. A similar problem is occurring with
computer magazines. In particular I am thinking of: Popular Computing,
Family Computing, PC Computing, Creative Computing, and Compute.
Page 40
Most of the magazines have changed their priorities from an emphasis
on hobbyist or home users to business. Popular Computing disappeared
shortly after changing its name to Business Computing. The same thing
happened with Family Computing after it changed its name and
emphasis to Home and Office Computing. Unfortunately PC Computing
is following the same path. PC Computing started out as an alternative
to other magazines such as PC Magazine and PC for the home or
hobbyist crowd in the PC community. It had reviews of games and
broader articles, while being a smidgen less technical and completely
unconnected to a business point of view. The subtitle is now “The
magazine for Business Computing Experts.” Readers have recognized
the change and written letters to the editor to comment and complain. As
for other examples, Creative Computing vanished and Compute
compressed down to one magazine from what was four. However,
Commodore 64s still sell, and that is a viable community. I guess PCs
are coming home from the office, but that doesn’t mean they are only
used for business at home. A whole community seems to be left
unserviced by this trend in computer magazines. True, computer gaming
magazines exist, but home computers are used for much more than just
playing games. One problem is that PCs are not particularly getting
cheaper. Any decrease in price has more or less been incidental to the
increase in power. The 386s cost today what the 286 cost yesterday. But
there are still no really affordable computers in the $100 to $200 range.
This is sad, because the computer is not as affordable as it should be.
Thus, personal computers are still not a normal part of most households
which was the real goal of the personal computer revolution. While most
homes have been affected by the arrival of microprocessors in many
home appliances, the Personal Computer itself is not yet a home
appliance. The general recent trend of computer development is aimed
at business, as opposed to the people. Not for the majority, but for the
minority. It’s like what IBM did for the mainframe and other mainframe
manufacturers in the '50s, '60s and '70s. The mainframe then was only
affordable by the biggest of the big companies or the large educational
institution. The difference today is that small business can afford
computers, but still only businesses. Computers are marketed as for
businesses and entrepreneurs, and not for the average person at home,
Page 41
or for the majority of the people. The radical push of the personal
computer movement in the mid to late '70s was to make the computer
available to everyone, and not just accessible to Fortune 500 companies.
True, these days computers are much more affordable than 20 years ago,
but the general movement in the personal computer world seems
opposed to its roots.
Ronda: How so?
Michael: IBM exemplifies this movement with the release of their
PS/2 line. These computers have a proprietary bus. IBM changed the
name away from personal computer to personal system 2 which is more
like the mainframe names. It made it less friendly in that sense.
Ronda: Are you optimistic? Pessimistic? What do you think will be
the future with computers? With you and computers?
Michael: Well by going away to school I’ll gain more access to
what’s called the Internet, the big net that exists, the connection of
computers across this country and across the world. You gain more
access when you go into an educational community. I’m optimistic
because of that. I’ll have to manage that as part of my time. Businesses
and education are involved in that. It’s harder if you live at home to have
access to it. (Editor’s Note: Home access is more available now, than it
was a year ago when this interview was done.) Somehow you need
something powerful enough to hook into. It’s not quite fully open. If you
live near an educational community you can gain access to it. I have and
you can. Our connection is MichNet. So that will be broadening. That
will be a connection with the rest of the world computerwise, but it’s not
quite just the computer. So that’s encouraging.
Somehow they are working on building things smaller and more
minuscule but not quite pricewise. The computers aren’t quite like the
microwave and the VCR. Home appliances started out expensive but
there are now so many different companies making them that they have
come down in price so they are affordable. As I said before computer
performance increased but it doesn’t come down in price. Actually, its
going to be a stretch to buy a computer for myself, but I wouldn’t have
been able to buy one last year. What used to be $2000 is now $1000 or
coming closer to $1000.
Ronda: Do you think there has been some kind of revolution with
Page 42
the computers? Do you think there has been a computer revolution?
Michael: Well, there is the personal computer. If it was up to the big
companies, there wouldn’t have been one. As I said the corporate trend
is reactionary.
Ronda: Do you think there’s been a computer revolution, Bill?
Bill: What do you mean by a computer revolution?
Ronda: That something fundamental has changed because of the
computer.
Bill: Fundamental?
Ronda: Or something substantial that you see at work?
Bill: We’re using computers more. We’ve got IBM 486 computers
on the shop floor.
Michael: But what do you use them for?
Bill: For altering and transferring programs to our CNC machining
center. We got rid of the Westinghouse computer in the computer room
and you can download more files into the 486 computer. It has all our
files already. It won’t hold us up when we are running the machine.
Ronda: But the computer isn’t being used to run a machine?
Bill: No it’s not to run a machine directly. You have other comput-
ers for that.
Michael: So the computers are like terminals?
Bill: It’s like a database. But you can edit and change the data if you
need to.
Ronda: Are most people comfortable with them. Or is it that if
people don’t have home computers its harder to use them?
Bill: Well they have menus instead of working with DOS. It just
takes a F[unction] key and that is it. We finally got a manual for it. The
editor is difficult to work with. They’re still working on a new editor....
Ronda: Remember they were talking about the workerless factory
in the last 7 or 8 years. My sense is that hasn’t come to pass.
Bill: Well, there are a lot less people working in my shop. They’re
standardizing everything so there’s less skill involved in putting dies
together.
Ronda: But the computer hasn’t cut the people out or caused pro-
blems?
Bill: No.
Page 43
Ronda: So do you think there’s been some kind of computer
revolution in the last 10 or 15 years? That something substantial has
happened to change.
Bill: Society?
Michael: Well a lot of things have computer chips in them now. All
your household appliances have them from the TV set on.
Bill: Cars have them.
Michael: Cars have them now so society has been changed by the
introduction of them. The mainframe computer didn’t use processing
chips. It took buildings with floors to house those computers. But now,
the personal computer is the achievement of the trend of miniaturization
that came in the 1950s.
Bill: More like evolution, right. You got chips in TV’s now. You
got picture-in-picture, not revolution, not a substantial change.
Michael: Well, there was the miniaturization after WWII but it
didn’t hit computers then. Computers were still the great big mainframes
that used the vacuum tubes. Then came the transistor, the microproces-
sor, and the integrated circuit. But they weren’t really utilized with the
mainframes. Or if they were, instead of a whole floor, it was a room. But
it wasn’t down to a single chip which now exists and which is constantly
getting smaller. They think they’re reaching the bounds actually. Now
people are speculating that the silicon chip has reached its physical
speed and size limits and a new material needs to be used, like chemical
or biological materials instead of electronic. But I feel if it had not been
for the personal computer revolution, there wouldn’t be such use of
processing chips and use of computing technology involved in so many
things in our daily lives.
Ronda: But I feel the substantial question is are they being used to
produce more with less labor? I think they are being used more as
consumer goods. But it doesn’t sound like they’ve made a change, a
fundamental change in the way things are produced. For example, at the
beginning of the Industrial Revolution people worked in their homes.
Then people were brought into the factories to work together. There was
an increasing division of labor, and then machines were introduced and
people operated the machines. Then machines were used to operate other
machines.
Page 44
It doesn’t seem as if the computer led to a similar kind of change in
industrial production. It doesn’t seem that computers are widely used to
produce things. It seems the computer has been used for paperwork but
not for producing goods.
Bill: It takes longer to get a computer to do something than it does
a machine. They are probably working on that stuff too.
Michael: But actually there’s something called CAD/CAM or
Computer Aided Design and Manufacturing. But then there’s something
called CIM which I did a study on and it seemed like it was trying to
steal the computer and give it to management which was a top down
design and not a bottom up design. When I read about it two years ago
it seemed a flop. It was trying to steal the computers from the people
rather than using the computers to help the manufacturing process. But
I don’t know what your experience has been with CIM.
Ronda: But there was also a big push to lower wages and have
people work a lot of overtime. And I thought that got in the way of using
the computer to make things more efficient.
Bill: You also had international competition too. Third world
countries have cheaper labor. So we had to compete with them. So that’s
one reason why the lower wages.
Ronda: But you can never compete with the cheapest country, and
in fact the story of production is that the more advanced the technology
the less labor that goes into producing something, the cheaper it can be
sold for. Somehow the whole stress trying to compete with cheaper
countries was a backwards trend. The price of things is very high
because hand labor is very expensive. So in this country we had the
ability to make production more efficient, that’s the story of how cars
have gotten cheaper, how microwaves have gotten cheaper, how air
conditioners have gotten cheaper because there were more advanced
technologies, not because you found someone abroad to work for
cheaper wages. With cheaper wages the price of goods stays high. There
is a need for more public discussion over how computers can be used to
change industrial production. There was a fight with the corporate world
over what would happen with computers and people had to challenge the
corporate barrage of wage cuts and longer hours which impede
automation. There are examples of countries where advanced technology
Page 45
that was available was never used in production because workers’ wages
were so low or their hours so long that it was not cost efficient to put in
the new machine. So that country remained technologically backward.
The story of the development of technology is that the more advanced
technology somewhere replaces the lower wage backward technology
somewhere else, not that goods made by low wage workers replace
goods made with less labor and more efficiently by machines. But
workers have to organize to prevent the wage cuts and increased hours
that impede the introduction of new technology. Somehow the corporate
attack on workers and unions has led to people looking backward, not
keeping our eye on how to go forward.
Ronda: Any final words?
Michael: Even though I have decided to go to Columbia University
in NYC instead of the University of Michigan, I am optimistic.
Columbia is less computer-oriented than the University of Michigan, but
Columbia seems better connected to the educational and academic
computer networks. But Michigan for me would have been a better
computer school. Columbia has more of its computer roots in the past
while Michigan has more in the future. There are a couple of centers
opening up and there is, at Columbia, the State Center for Computing
Research. But it’s not as obvious as Michigan how involved it is with
computers. I am sort of pessimistic, because with the age of the
computer industry, it seems to have receded. But it’s probably just a
cycle.
Ronda: No, it’s a fight. You have to figure out how to take it up.
The personal computer caught people by surprise when it spread so
quickly and so substantially. People now have to evaluate what has
happened. I feel the lesson is you can’t trust the business world of large
corporations to develop computers and computer technology. Big
corporations can’t be coddled by government, the press, etc. and
encouraged to freeze the development of technology or to go backwards
to hand labor as they have done in many instances. The machine is a
machine for society. It was a mistake to have trusted the corporate world
to develop it. Instead the corporate world must be regulated and limited
in its efforts to impede the development of technology. That’s what anti-
trust legislation originally accomplished. The personal computer was
Page 46
created while there was a U.S. govt. anti-trust suit on against IBM which
kept it from interfering with the development of the personal computer.
Once again there is a need for something independent of the corporate
world, and there is a need for regulations and limitations on the
corporate world so that their narrow self interest is prevented from
interfering with social and technological development.
Michael: You need a new Henry Ford for the Computer world.
Ronda: No, you need another “Computers for the People” move-
ment.
Michael: No, again.
Bill: My niece is going to go to Michigan State and she’s not going
to get a computer. She’s going to get a word processor. You have a
screen, keyboard, and a printer all in one unit. That suits her.
Michael: But its not compatible with anything other than another
wordprocessor of the same type.
Bill: There are some that have a floppy disk.
Ronda: But it’s sad the computers aren’t cheap with a cheaper
printer too.
Bill: Well it’s a letter-quality printer, she’s not going to be doing
graphics.
Ronda: I thought John Kemeny once predicted that there would be
computers used in the schools for wondrous things. But now he is
disappointed that that has not happened.
Bill: One of the problems is software. There aren’t enough software
developers to write programs people need. To get them involved.
Michael: Its not just software developers, its ideas. People are not
creating new ideas but merely copying old ideas.
Ronda: But I thought that there was the discouragement, when
people were told “People don’t need to learn to program.” Michael
learned to program and it was a good thing he learned to program.
Instead of saying it’s a good thing to learn a little programming it was
said you don’t need programming. So it seems that there has been a lot
of pressure to keep people away from utilizing computers and discourag-
ing them instead.
Michael: I left out that I know a little MS-DOS batch language, a
little C, and a little Forth. I did very little in Assembler.
Page 47
Bill: Are you going to take computer classes in collage.
Michael: I don’t know if I’ll have time.
Ronda: To sum up, it seems it is as if this period is like the period
in France before the French Revolution. Then there was the basis to have
capitalism, but you had the feudal lords and the King holding society
back. You had a Monarchy. There was a need for the French Revolution
to get rid of the Monarchy and the Aristocracy and the feudal social
forms and laws that they kept in place. They prevented the reforms that
were needed to develop large scale production in France. The problem
we have today seems similar. Big companies are discouraging invest-
ment in new technology like computers because such investment will
lower their rate of profit. There is a need to get rid of this fetter so that
technology can be encouraged and developed.
Supplement on Usenet News
The Amateur Computerist will publish a Supplement on Usenet
News in Fall, 1992. It will contain articles about telecommunications
and the development and importance of Usenet News. The Supplement
will be available in both electronic and print format.
The Editors
The opinions expressed in articles are those of their
authors and not necessarily the opinions of the
Amateur Computerist newsletter. We welcome sub-
missions from a spectrum of viewpoints.
Page 48
EDITORIAL STAFF
Ronda Hauben
William Rohler
Norman O. Thompson
Michael Hauben (1973-2001)
Jay Hauben
The Amateur Computerist invites submissions.
Articles can be submitted via e-mail:
Permission is given to reprint articles from this issue in a
non profit publication provided credit is given, with name
of author and source of article cited.
ELECTRONIC EDITION
ACN Webpage:
http://www.ais.org/~jrh/acn/
All issues of the Amateur Computerist are on-line.
Back issues of the Amateur Computerist are available at:
http://www.ais.org/~jrh/acn/Back_Issues/
All issues can be accessed from the Index at:
http://www.ais.org/~jrh/acn/NewIndex.pdf
Page 49