Tuesday, March 28, 2006

Why You Too Should Cancel Cable

It all started when I decided to cancel cable.

About a month ago, I got a letter from Cablevision, informing me that my monthly rates were about to increase. At that point, I evaluated the situation, as follows. I watch only about 3 hours of television per week. The rest of the time, it's just on as background noise, while I am doing something on the computer. There are only two shows that I like to tune in to regularly - The Daily Show and The Colbert Report - which adds up to about 20 minutes of actual programming. However, lately, I've just been going to the (seemingly legal) sites that stream the funniest clips from those programs the very next day.

With that in mind, I made the call.

- Hello, this is Frank, how may I help you?
- I would like to cancel cable.
- What do you mean?
- I don't want to pay for cable TV anymore.
- Really? Have you heard of our low introductory offer for premium channels, such as HBO and Cinemax?
- I think, maybe, I am not being very clear.
- Ms. Paley, let me ask you, where do you intend to get television service?
- I don't intend to get television service.
[about 30 seconds of silence]
- Well what about news?
- I like to read the newspaper, and I visit a lot of Internet sites. Also, there's NPR, which I stream to my computer. For free.
- Well what about movies and original programming?!!
- The New York Public Library has a very large assortment of movies on DVD, and Amazon sells collections of entire seasons of pretty much all the shows. You heard of Amazon, haven't you? And the library? Do you know where the library is Frank?
[more silence, and I'm becoming less amused and more annoyed]
- Sports! What about sports!?
- Do you remember when Cablevision had that huge dispute with the Yankees, and I couldn't get the YES network for about a month while they were working out the details of their contract? Well, that's when I started listening to baseball on the radio, and realized that I actually prefer it that way!

This went on for a little while longer. But eventually, he informed me that I would be added to a special "watch list" of people who cancel cable without an explanation. And with that ominous warning, I was allowed to break free.

I was very surprised that this was such a huge ordeal. Who was this guy? Why did he take it so personally? Maybe he recently bought Cablevision stock. But what did my measly 50 dollars a month mean for their bottom line anyway? Plus, I am still shelling out a huge chunk of cash each month for digital phone and Internet service. In the next few weeks I realized why he was so upset. Essentially, I was putting into question the very foundation of our society.

Week 1: I lose 3 pounds. This is unexpected, because I am not dieting, and I am not exercising. I compare the ingredients in the shampoo that I always buy with those in the generic brand, and opt to buy the generic brand. Same deal with other toiletries and groceries. (Do I really need green tea extract in my soap? No, I don’t). Strangely enough, I find myself thinking "why am I buying another black dress, I know I have one just like that at home" at the checkout counter of Club Monaco. Also, I am extremely adamant against seeing the latest Matthew Mcconaughey movie. Total savings at the end of the week add up to about 150 dollars.

Week 2: I lose 2 more pounds. My ICC 3-minute blitz rating goes up by almost 200 points. I read "The Visual Display of Quantitative Information" by Edward Tufte, and construct a "data rich" statistical graph to analyze my professional/academic/personal accomplishments and goals. Recalling something that my Professor mentioned in class a month ago, I decide that it might be fun to prove the trinomial revision identity geometrically.

Week 3: I stay up later at night, but I am more alert during the day. I become more disgruntled with current events. I get especially upset when people say stupid things. Particularly, if those people happen to be elected political officials. I realize just how powerful television really is at subjugating the masses. I decide that someone should publish a pamphlet. I call my friend at the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA students are the go-to people when you decide to change the world), and he suggests that I blog about it, and poll the public for some links (i.e. supporting evidence in the form of valid research).

I conclude that television is an extremely effective and powerful way of controlling, manipulating, and distracting the American people. It works in three very basic and obvious ways:

1. Making you the passive observer of current events.

When you watch television, you become a passive observer of news. When this happens, your cognitive processes slow down, and you absorb information before you have a chance to process it. In this way, television makes your brain a soft and squishy sponge, perfectly willing to internalize all the misinformation that is propagated to further somebody else's agenda. When you become an active seeker of news (as you are when you browse websites, read newspapers, or talk to other people) you are more likely to question and analyze the content before believing that it is true. If your co-worker tells you that the guy in the next cubicle is stashing weapons of mass destruction under his desk, you are likely to ask for proof; but if a TV news anchor tells you something similar, you will probably go on thinking that it is true.

2. Making you a consumerist whore.

Even if you turn your set off during commercials, you are still constantly being bombarded with advertisements on a very subconscious level. You can't buy the things that you need to make your life better, but television is extremely successful at convincing you of the exact opposite. Your husband will not love you more if you cut your hair like Jennifer Anniston, there is no difference between a Hyundai and a Mercedes, and there is nothing in the world that will make you look like an underwear model.

3. Distracting you from the real problems.

Television is able to distract you from the real problems (in your life, in the world) by either presenting you with irrelevant and superficial problems that will divert your focus, or by providing enough instant gratification to make you forget about your drab and wretched life. Someone on television tells you that two guys in San Francisco want to get married, and you are so distracted by this attack on your ideals that you conveniently forget that there is a war, in which many innocent people are dying. Or you spend your evenings watching attractive people doing exciting things, and this escapism prevents you from facing reality and making positive changes in your own life. (By the way, there is nothing wrong with seeking entertainment, but television creates a routine of dependency that inadvertently results in a state of false complacency).

Finally, here are some really stupid things that people tell me when I suggest that they too break free, and cancel their cable TV service.

How will my son ever make it to the major leagues if he can't watch pro ball games on TV?

This is quite asinine. From an entirely statistical point of view, I can say with relative certainty that your son will never make it to the majors. But besides that, Joe Dimaggio never watched baseball on TV. Neither did Sandy Koufax. They went out and PLAYED baseball. If you plop your kids in front of the TV for 3 hours every evening, you might make them overweight and dimwitted like baseball players, but you certainly won't increase their chances of becoming professional athletes. If you really want to give your kids a chance at a career in sports, make sure that physical activity is an integral part of their (and your) daily routine. Take them to a real baseball game instead, at least that way you can all get some fresh air.

I watch CNN. Where will I get my news? How will I know what is going on in the world?

This is probably the stupidest thing that anyone has ever said to me. You will certainly not know what's going on in the world by watching CNN, or any of the other major news channels. Nor will you become more informed about the world and people around you by watching local news. This is supposed to be the information age, so why are so many people still relying on such a primitive source of news? You can probably get more relevant content from reading Talking Points Memo for 5 minutes than you can from watching CNN all day long. And if you wish to stay away from such blatantly partisan sites, you can always turn to the more traditional AP outlets on the web. Even reading CNN.com is better than watching it on television, because it give you a chance to go back and take note when the reported information is stupid or just plain wrong. Television news never gives you enough time to have a “wait a minute there” moment.

What will I talk to my coworkers about the next day? They all gather and chat about American Idol, and I don't want to be a social outcast.

Well, your coworkers are obviously idiots. And, instead of encouraging this sort of behavior, you should make an effort to change the culture. Have confidence in your decision. This is just like high school. When you do something odd, do it with unwavering self-assurance, and everyone else will follow your trend.

My hope is that there will be a massive social and cultural move away from television. The benefits of such a change will be tremendous. We will become smarter, more informed, and less prone to commercial manipulation. We will not stand for lies and misinformation from our government, we will take action and effect change. We will eliminate credit card debt, and pay off our mortgages faster. Our kids will eat more fruit and do better on standardized exams. We will become global participants, and won't need to tell foreigners that we are Canadian when we visit their countries. We will use less oil. We will get to work on time. We will have better relationships with friends and family. We will make better music, write better books, and develop better software. Just for starters. Pardon my naïve optimism, but I really think that remarkable progress can be achieved very quickly, if you too decide to cancel cable.

102 Comments:

At 3/28/2006 11:01 AM, Mike said...

Great post. Kudos. I always thought that you should publish pamphlets, or start a revolution.

 
At 3/28/2006 11:18 AM, Alex Malikov said...

Hey Irina, awesome article. By the way, you didn't mention bit torrents, which are quickly making all TV completely obsolete.

 
At 3/28/2006 11:43 AM, Erin said...

Irina, excellent post, and I really appreciate it. As you know, I care very much about the effects of television on child psychology. Here are some links, as per your request.

Umich Med School site about the effects of TV on kids, lots of useful links to statistical studies

American Psychological Association: kids can’t tell the difference between advertisement and reality

TV=fat kids, duh

 
At 3/28/2006 1:06 PM, andrew@mit said...

i always suspected that you would do something silly like this and try to destroy the entire capitalist structure that holds our precious little economy together. ofcourse you need green tea extract in your soap damn it! you need it like you need air!

 
At 3/28/2006 1:24 PM, kevin said...

most of the shows that i like to watch are bbc shows anyhow so i don’t know why i pay forty dollars each month for cable. its such a waste i don’t even keep it on as background noise.

 
At 3/28/2006 3:19 PM, tom said...

Irina good article but I don’t understand all this research that’s coming out like “newsflash newsflash! watching tv will make your kids fat.” How is this not common knowledge? I don’t get it. Sitting down for many hours will make you fat. If there ever was a duh moment that is it.

 
At 3/28/2006 4:35 PM, Kevin said...

What kind of people gather to chat about American Idol? Do you know people like that? Where exactly is this mythical water cooler that you are envisioning?

 
At 3/28/2006 4:57 PM, alk2147 said...

Fantastic! Our tv broke a month ago and I’m too cheap to buy a new one so I turned off our service. It’s great. I soon learned that my husband has lots of interesting things to tell me! Ha! Who would’ve thunk it!

 
At 3/28/2006 5:13 PM, Anonymous said...

so naïve of you to think that a cultural change like this can actually happen in this country. the way I see it, we are doomed. just watch american idol, eat your donuts, and wait for the apocalypse.

 
At 3/28/2006 5:23 PM, Irina said...

>> you didn't mention bit torrents
I don't know what you are talking about, crazy person!

>> Here are some links
Erin, thanks for doing my research for me! I happen to have an incomplete master’s project in dire need of a good reference list, if you are interested.

>> Where exactly is this mythical water cooler that you are envisioning?
Undoubtedly, somewhere in the midwest.

 
At 3/28/2006 5:52 PM, James McCarthy said...

Over here(in Ireland) we have to pay a thing called a "TV Licence", which basically pays for the state funded TV stations, it's the same in the UK(with the BBC).

After my dad moving out & leaving me with the TV I got a letter, asking me to pay the licence.

Thats about $150 per year, I thought I don't want to pay that. So I threw out the TV.

Unfortunatly Ive replaced it with internet, which is better but still takes huge chunks of time.

 
At 3/28/2006 6:10 PM, Anonymous said...

I did this about ten years ago. In those ten years, I've grown increasingly disgusted with my fellow Americans, on a number of levels.

You will, too. It's a two-edged sword.

Just so you know.

 
At 3/28/2006 6:15 PM, jaaron said...

I haven't had cable for seven years now apart from three months of free service last year when we switched from DSL to cable internet. I agree completely that it's liberating. Of course, like others mentioned, I tend to spend a lot of time online...

 
At 3/28/2006 6:29 PM, Anonymous said...

I cancelled my cable over a year ago and my television had no antenna so watching TV was impossible. No one noticed. My coworkers never knew, my friends at church never suspected.

I think key to staying socially involved is using news aggregators like digg or reddit. Enough interesting stuff pops up everyday that the best story usually trumps anything interesting happening on American Idol.

 
At 3/28/2006 6:30 PM, gecko said...

Whoa, irina, you made it into the top ten on reddit (http://reddit.com/)! You're famous!

I'm going to huddle around the water cooler and talk about you so that all those people with tvs can write about how they hate me.

actually, i don't know what's up with all all this homo sapien on cathode ray tube violence here. I find television incredibly informative. Like the other day i learned that peeing on the third rail won't kill me . . .

 
At 3/28/2006 6:37 PM, Liam said...

Granted, my world view is kind of biased. But in my circle of latte sipping, Volvo driving, tree hugging, Nader voting, liberal hippies, what you write is pretty much the accepted viewpoint. I think the same thing goes for most people reading your site or browsing reddit. You are sort of preaching to the choir here.

 
At 3/28/2006 6:39 PM, Richard said...

I'm sorry I can't find appropriate links or references but there are a few studies on television's effects which you might wish to know about.

1) television severely distorts viewer's perception of reality, especially their perception of violence

Television is so violent that viewers become paranoid and agree with statements such as "the chance of a violent incident affecting me in any given day is 1/10" or even 1/2. This is utterly ridiculous, the actual probability is closer to 1/1000, but there you have it. Because of television, people believe they're swimming in a sea of violence.

2) American television watching is surpassed only by Japan. Americans watch an average of something like 6 hours a day, Japanese 9.

3) Japanese television is ultra violent, even more so than American television. This is because of social and legal standards that censor depictions of sexuality. Since television can't show sex, it shows violence instead.

A *sane* policy towards television would be to utterly censor violence and to leave sexuality unfettered. But that isn't likely to happen. At least in Europe, they don't look too kindly on mixing sex and violence (ie, rape) but in the USA, depictions of rape are actually preferred to healthy sex.

Given the above, it's now easy to understand how and why,

4) Japanese are utterly paranoid of violence. Think about this for a minute. This is a country with a crime rate so low that it's invisible. In fact, Japan's criminal element is organized so well that it never touches ordinary people. Japanese have far less to fear from crime than, say, French yet they are far more terrified of it.

and also,

5) the USA and Japan are the only two industrialized countries on the planet with the death penalty. Why? Because they're terrified of crime.

There's more.

There was a specific town in America a couple decades ago that had only just gotten television. The town was surrounded by mountains and so they didn't get any broadcasts. This was a natural sociological experiment on the effects of television and so naturally enough all eyes were turned to it.

What they found was that television greatly increased violence in the generation who *grew up on it*.

There were, and continue to be, a lot of lying scumbags who spinned all the research to say that television doesn't increase violence because you can't see the effect right away. Hell, you can't see the effect within 5 years. No, it takes a full generation for the effect to appear. But it is there, like a big freaking tidal wave.

Again, I apologize for not having concrete references but some of this stuff I remember reading when I was growing up, and the rest I can't seem to find where I thought I read it. Perhaps http://www.killology.com has some refs, though take that site with a grain of salt.

 
At 3/28/2006 6:43 PM, Anonymous said...

You know I like to watch some shows on tv (not american idol but there’s actually some good stuff on once in a while especially on HBO). I tune in occasionally but according to you I am responsible for the downfall of wester civilization. It’s difficult to dissagree with you without seeming like an uneducated, overweight, dimwitted slob.

 
At 3/28/2006 6:46 PM, Irina said...

>> you made it into the top ten on reddit

I think that means that there are just as many people voting me down, as there are voting me up. I don't get much love from reddit folk (just read the comments) but I sure do get lots of traffic!

 
At 3/28/2006 7:00 PM, ari said...

I think that this even surpassed your geek post in popularity! What is that Tom Lehrer line you always repeat, "titillating the converted"? you can't change the world if everyone who hears you already agrees.

 
At 3/28/2006 7:25 PM, Wes said...

I have cable TV, but only because I don't pay for it. I rarely watch it (except for The Apprentice which I could get off of torrents anyway). Screw cable TV and their ridiculous rates.

Since I stopped watching cable TV I get movies from the library (sometimes I rent), and I get my news off of the Internet.

 
At 3/28/2006 7:54 PM, Cidsa said...

I think a lot of employees get in trouble when they don't try to hook a customer back.
Also, cable news is hardly worth mentioning as a large amount of time it's either a)partially incorrect or b)an outright lie.

Also to the person who mentioned that japanese TV is ultra-violent..have you even watched japanese TV? It is the most dull experience of your life. Any anime that is exciting and/or violent is released on DVD only and isn't broadcast on TV. Anime also tends to have bizarre timeslots, like Fullmoon wo Sagashite was aired around 5 in the morning.
Japanese TV certainly isn't censored, but it is insanely boring. There is maybe 8 channels and they show crappy variety shows and stupid shit most of the day. Tuning in for an anime or drama is really the only reason to ever watch TV in Japan...
If American TV were like this, you'd be watching maybe 1 or two hours of TV a day. Hey..maybe that's a good idea.

 
At 3/28/2006 8:12 PM, zwichenzug said...

Yeah, sure, I could be a better person, but if I did all that would I still feel guilty about eating cheetos?

Please don't krush my heart. Wouldn't the world be better if we all just went along to get along? Wouldn't the economy zip along better if we all paid the cable company and bought all the soap products? C'mon, wouldn't the world be a better place if we were all lemmings?

Next thing you'll be telling us you've got a color monitor to view the Internet. heh!

BTW, sex IS better after watching a soap. Get to it.

 
At 3/28/2006 8:36 PM, Anonymous said...

Actually there's another weirder thing you can experience. Get rid of your TV. When you tell people you don't have one they're totally shocked and almost universally respond with these exact words, "What? Your kidding right? Well you know I have an old one in my basement I'm not using I can give you" It's hilarious! It's like you're suddenly some poverty victim and they assume the only reason you don't have one is that you can't afford it. For me this went on for 9 years and I was too stupid to clue in that I could be taking them (making people happy) and selling them on eBay as a side business. I didn't have one until a friend came over with one, a stand and a VCR and set it up for me. That's alright. I can watch movies and the one show a week I want to see (Corner Gas, only available in Canada) I can get with rabbit ears. All costing me nothing which is about the right price for TV these days.

I've just invested several thousand in a very good stereo since I love music.... again people are wierded out. No I didn't by a 7 channel hometheatre. Stereo. 2 Channels and done right it's spectacular.

 
At 3/28/2006 8:42 PM, Kodijack said...

I admit that I tape, albeit only network (no cable), three shows a week. The commercials are so bad that I liken them to pron, especially the car commercials.

 
At 3/28/2006 8:48 PM, Jacob said...

I agree with almost everything you've asserted here. I think that criticizing television as a whole is a bit misguided, however, in that it does still offer some decent programming. I watch very little TV, but when I do, I notice it parallels the types of information I seek on the 'net; for example, I enjoy the history channel, public broadcasting, DIY programs, etc..

I'm not going to try and offer a formal argument for this in your comments, but I think it is a bit short-sighted to write off television completely as a medium for information. Despite all of it's flaws and abuses, it still has some value. That said, I noticed that someone alluded to BitTorrent, and you are obviously blogging. Both are tools I think will slowly phase out television. However (though I hope it is sooner vs. later), the number of internet-connected computers in this country has a long way to go before catching up with cable-connected televisions.

Lastly, and a bit off the subject. Advertising is just about lying. There ARE superior and inferior products and services. That's just how a free market works. Assuming that all advertising is simply brainwashing and lies leads one to believe something ridiculous such as "Hyundai is no different that Mercedes" (as you said). That is simply not true. There are products made with superior quality and dependability in mind, and there are products made with quantity and affordability in mind. Ultimately it is the consumers choice as to which concerns them more. Like I said, it is a bit off the subject; however, I think it is instructive to note the misunderstandings that can originate from taking any given stance too far.

I am mostly in agreement with you, just be careful how far you take it...

 
At 3/28/2006 8:49 PM, Jacob said...

DOH! I meant to say "ADVERTISING IS NOT JUST ABOUT LYING."

 
At 3/28/2006 8:54 PM, Jon said...

I totally agree with your assessment on television. However, I thought the sports argument was a little weak. I'm not much of a baseball fan, but I do feel that football and hockey are far more enjoyable to watch than to listen to. But, after thinking about it some more, if I suddenly got rid of my TV and wanted to watch football, I'd probably be more likely to head to a bar or a friend's house to watch it which would further increase social interaction.

 
At 3/28/2006 8:56 PM, Lee said...

Interesting post (found it on Reddit) - I've watched less than 2 hours of TV a week for at least 6 years now, and when I went off to university 3 years ago I stopped watching entirely. Can't say I miss it.

That's not to say I'm being particularly productive or being any less of a consumer whore - being around a society of consumer whores forms a great deal of social pressure to follow trends even when you don't see them on TV.

Additionally, as intimated by earlier commenters, there's the easy-to-fall-into problem of replacing a cable addiction with something else. Endless 'net surfing, for example. Or MMORPGS - I play more World of Warcraft now than I ever watched TV, and I can certainly tell you it's impacting my cognitive output and productivity in the same way that TV does for others. While it doesn't make you a passive observer of current events or a consumerist whore, it is CERTAINLY a way to distract one from life's real problems (like exams >.<).

Also, kudos for having the courage to put a strongly-worded opinion out there - many would try to be more soft-spoken (especially near the end as you list the stupid things people say) and weaken their argument.

 
At 3/28/2006 9:49 PM, Rolando Garza said...

Hello Irina. First time visitor, but I'm surely going to be visiting more. I agree with your way of thinking. I actually ditched cable a while ago...

I fetch news from the 'net. Listen to music from Podcasts (my personal favorite is MSRcast), and listen to tech news from TWIT (another tech podcast).

The internet is quickly becoming a very interesting place to tune into... but lets not allow for it to become the next TV (outlets of mind control).

 
At 3/28/2006 10:06 PM, Anonymous said...

Good. Now read Pascal's Pensees.

 
At 3/28/2006 10:15 PM, Shiva said...

Great post!
This has been something that I've been contemplating lately too. I have almost totally stopped watching TV, usually choosing to watch downloaded TV Shows, that way I dont have to structure my entire life around TV timings!

Here in India, pretty much the entire country is absolutely obsessed with cricket! I was really wondering why, and all evidence points towards advertising and programs constantly talking about and hyping up cricket. Its like the "orwellian" sheep!

 
At 3/28/2006 10:20 PM, Anonymous said...

Excellent! Glad to hear there are more people out there like us. My boyfriend and I dropped TV over a year ago on a bet to see who could live without their worst habit the longest (mine was TV - huge addiction to Law & Order as you can see it on any channel at any time of day; his was playing Civ III until 5am).

In this past year, we've paid down credit cards, lost weight, bought a house, and went back to school for our Masters degrees. We still surf the net a bit too much, but at least we aren't bombarded by the weighted crapola on TV news - For example Fox News. (By the way, a thought provoking movie to watch is "OutFoxed". It shows just how far "news" stations and journalists are willing to go to impose their own beliefs on Americans - and how even the most educated person will believe them! We realized just how unnerving Fox News is after watching the movie and having nightmares about Insurgent Republicans.)

Anyway, I hope this helps more people to have the courage to turn off the TV and find better things to do with their lives!

 
At 3/28/2006 10:27 PM, sarah said...

Interesting Article. I've gone without tv for almost 3yrs now and my life has been the better for it. If someone comes to my apt and realizes I have no tv they alway say, "Wow I wish I could do that!" and I think, "Is something stopping you?". The real question is do you quit television to become more independent and free-thinking - or do you already have to possess these qualities to realize that not owning a tv is actually a viable option! Lots of feedback from people impressed with your post but few comments from people who have done it or say they are inspired to try.

 
At 3/28/2006 10:30 PM, Nick Fessel said...

Good post. Here are my thoughts about television: http://www.nickfessel.com/essays/Televisions.html

 
At 3/28/2006 10:53 PM, Anonymous said...

Blow up your TV
Throw away your papers
Move to the country
Build you a home...



If you don't know that song (or John Prine, who wrote/sings it), boy, you really do need to get rid of your TV.

 
At 3/28/2006 10:53 PM, Zach said...

Wow! Militancy! Awesome. I'm paying $25 a month for cable and right now I don't watch TV at all, because I don't like my living room... maybe you have a point.

 
At 3/28/2006 11:21 PM, Tyler said...

tyler says: kill your television and start up a fight club in your own city!

stick it to teh man!

 
At 3/28/2006 11:45 PM, Jeff said...

Wow.

I've been thinking this for years now. I've contemplated pulling the cord, but sadly my roommate is a TV junky. If he wasn't around, I would surely join the revolution!

...btw, I got rid of the TV in my bedroom years ago and never looked back. I read more, go to bed earlier, and enjoy my female companions far more (and for longer!)

 
At 3/29/2006 12:13 AM, Anonymous said...

I wonder if that "watch list" is really that they are concerned that you might have figured out how to "steal" the cable, and just wanted to stop paying for it.

Though I suspect what it really means is that you are going to be carpet-bombed with promotional offers in the hope that you return to the fold. Probably "Frank" has an evaluation or bonus riding on how many lost sheep he can shepherd back.

 
At 3/29/2006 12:59 AM, Walter X. Ego said...

Wow, i never knew there were so many people un-addicted to TV. I think I'll give this "life without TV" thing a chance. Hardest thing to do will be to convince the others in my home to do so as well.

Anyway, all this anti-TV feeling is swell, but we should be careful not to replace the television addiction with some other addiction (be it web surfing (as a way to escape reality, mind you - web surfing in general is not bad), jogging etc.).

 
At 3/29/2006 1:19 AM, Brad said...

Along the lines of "making you a consumerist whore," here is a link to a video called "Affluenza," which goes into greater detail about the American obsession with consumerism, why it is unhealthy, and the role of television and the media in that obsession:

http://www.netcast.usf.edu/Public/announce/COPH/F03SocBeh/F03SocBeh.htm

(click the "Affluenza" link in the middle of the page, sorry for the low quality)

I hope this link is helpful.

 
At 3/29/2006 1:52 AM, Anonymous said...

I was only able to read about 1/2 the comments before throwing in my two-cents as it were. I work in this industry and I agree with the author. Although this is nothing new, there has been a 'kill your telelvision' movement for years, I still agree. The real problem is we are cattle, we always have been and always will be. We are fed the info they want us to see and hear to keep us as calm as tibetian cows. I have always thought of TV as an entertainment device, not life support. In the post 9/11 U.S, we are worried that something might happen and we will not see it live and therefore not be prepared for something we will probably not have control over anyway. If you want to watch TV, watch it for entertainment, brain candy, whatever. Don't live for it. I have never seen so many come unglued as the people who watch the weather channel and call and complain simply because the local weather isn't being displayed on the bottom of the screen. Want to know what it is like outside? Open a window!
TV is too much part of the 'Wal-Mart' culture we live in. It is really just sad. I will betcha if you turn off your TV totally for 7 straight days, you will notice a difference in your life and it will be for the better.
Call a friend, take a walk, surf the Net, go to church and make a new friend, these are the things that are more important American Idol or CNN and the things that will be remembered years from now, not Ryan *whats-his-name* or the latest from the intrenched reporters in Iraq.
(off soapbox, commericals are over now). Now back to our regularly scheduled blog comments. :)

 
At 3/29/2006 2:06 AM, Anonymous said...

Was this change in your life due to a lack of television, or was television just a catalyst. It seems to me that this change has little to do with the 20 minutes of television you took in daily and more to do with a paradigm shift in your own life.
I like your sentiments and believe most of us would do better with no television, or at least less. None the less it seems to me your logic is flawed. A lack of television has not changed your life. You have changed your life and the first step you took was to stop receiving cable.
Also, and rather off the point, there is a difference between a Mercedes and a Hyundai. Just like there is a difference between Wal-Mart and Nordstrom. Life is, as far as I can tell, just a bunch of experiences. So I say make sure you make the best of those experiences and enjoy the driving experience of a Mercedes and be treated like a human by not shopping at Wal-Mart. On the other hand, don't waste money on green tea soap if you can't enjoy in beyond the cheap soap. Also don't spend money on things (like a Mercedes) if you don't have the income, creditor and debt are not a good experience.

So stop paying for cable, unless you are REALLY getting a worthwhile experience out of it!

 
At 3/29/2006 2:16 AM, Anonymous said...

I moved to a new area a while ago, and phoned the local cable company to sign up for internet access. They were stunned that I didn't want cablevision as well. But they would give me a month free to try it out! No, make that three months! And all that great content!

When I finally explained that I think TV sucks and that's why we don't have a television, it was as if the sky had fallen. They had to put me on hold to figure out how - or if - they could process my order. Sheesh.

I threw television out of my life a decade or so ago. It's one of the best decisions I ever made.

 
At 3/29/2006 3:40 AM, Adarsh Bhat said...

I am so convinced. But how do I convince my mother who lives with me? :)

 
At 3/29/2006 3:54 AM, Anonymous said...

LOL, The Daily Show is for dumbasses.

 
At 3/29/2006 5:55 AM, Anonymous said...

"there is no difference between a Hyundai and a Mercedes,"

I don't know about that, but there's a huge difference between my old Ford minivan and my new Lexus convertible.

Other than that I agree with you!

Rob

 
At 3/29/2006 6:36 AM, Ira Krakow said...

When my children were preteens, our TV broke. We didn't fix it for a year. No harm done. They ended up finding out that reading books is fun, and they even talked to us more.

Nowadays, I only watch TV occasioally - NFL games (in season), and news only after I read about it at My Yahoo or one of the newsreaders I subscribe to. I'm also more critical. I see the bias much more because I can see what the editors omit.

Maybe we can start a club for Non TV Viewers. I'd be cancelling my Comcast account, but my wife still likes to watch :-).

See my blog about this.

 
At 3/29/2006 7:22 AM, Charles said...

Television
Drug of the nation
breeding ignorance
and feeding radiation

 
At 3/29/2006 8:01 AM, mbs said...

i am a stranger to you but i wanted to chime in and say that i, too, cancelled cable about a year ago and i've never looked back.

my conversation with the cable company was a little different though:

him: what are you going to do all day?
me: i dunno, read books?
him: good for you! i've been thinking about cancelling mine too.

-mbs

 
At 3/29/2006 8:05 AM, Josh Staiger said...

Wow, by coincidence I blogged about this yesterday as well:

I'm unplugging my TV

But I think you did a better job.

Great entry!

 
At 3/29/2006 8:26 AM, Jason Prini said...

I've been off cable for years now and I wont go back...ever. With Zip.ca {the Canadian version of NetFlix} I get everything I want, and only have to put up with oppresive DVD menues and intros. I agree that my life is better without cable, even though we still get 7 channels over the air. I found very similar results. I Too get frustrated with the lemmings around me repeating what they see on TV. We've probably saved thousands of dollars as well by avoiding brand name everything and buying from online reviews.

 
At 3/29/2006 8:58 AM, Rick B said...

This is practically the same thing that happened to me 2 years ago.

For the longest time I was upset having to pay $50 for cable TV and a whole bunch of channels I didn't want. So I decided to cancel my subscription. The person on the other end of the phone could not seem to grasp the idea that I would no longer be watching TV (apart from the occasional DVD I would rent).

After 10 minutes of back and forth, about all these wonderful services and programmes I could get (that they never offered before, but only once I told them I was cancelling) they grudgingly agreed to cancel my cable at the end of the month.

Now as for the guy that claimed that Japanese TV is too violent, I just have to ask where he got his information?

I live in Japan, and most of what he's said about TV (and other cultural stuff) is complete and utter crap.

 
At 3/29/2006 9:16 AM, Anonymous said...

Good job! I gave up cable tv over five years ago then the tv went in the closet. Now I listen to the radio all the time and don't find myself stuck to one place in the house because I need to catch the latest show. If I really want to watch a show I can always go to a friends house for that hour or two of viewing but even then it's as much for the company as it is for the tv show.

 
At 3/29/2006 9:36 AM, Anonymous said...

Too easy to blame the medium, rather than ourselves. Do we need to unplug our cable and throw out our TV's, or should we just watch less? All things in moderation.

As for Jon Stewart, you seem surprisingly blithe about your ethics. "Apparently legal"? Do you reserve your critical analysis for TV news only? Those who reject TV and then seek the content via the internet must be vigilant to avoid becoming theives.

 
At 3/29/2006 9:39 AM, Scott Reynen said...

I've scraped RSS feeds for clips from both the Daily Show and the Colbert Report that you might be interested in:

http://weblog.randomchaos.com/rss/dailyshow.xml
http://weblog.randomchaos.com/rss/colbertreport.xml

 
At 3/29/2006 9:41 AM, Anonymous said...

Awesome. Good stuff. I cancelled my cable roughly a month ago, and I also received the irate "why the hell would you do that?!" response. I give TV credit for many things. It brought us a new form of expression, a new form of bringing information to the masses, etc. However, for all your reasons above (misinformation, advertisements, etc) it has become a blunder. And, quite frankly, I enjoy sticking it to the cable companies, because as far as they're concerned I'm $80 less they'll receive each month. Haha!

 
At 3/29/2006 10:11 AM, Apreche said...

The watch list is very much a list of people they think are stealing cable. When we signed up for Optimum Online, but not Optimum TV Cablevision harassed me for months. Once a guy even came to our house and asked where our sattelite dish was. TV is dying in the US, but the vast majority of the people who still don't understand the Internet can't imagine life without TV. Their world is falling apart and they don't know what to do. It's awesome.

I haven't paid for cable or watched broadcast TV in 5 years. It's awesome!

 
At 3/29/2006 10:36 AM, Anonymous said...

You would like this movie.

 
At 3/29/2006 10:47 AM, Anonymous said...

But I loves my HD content! Maybe after hockey season...yeah.

 
At 3/29/2006 10:54 AM, Chris said...

Several years ago, my family gave up TV for Lent. As Good Friday appraoched, we had a really bad electrical storm, and my satellite receiver was fried. I'm not normally one to ascribe things to acts of God, but at any rate, I cancelled my satellite permanently.

We haven't abandoned television entirely, by any means, but we don't watch much network programming. We tend to watch Netflix movies and tv shows which have already proven themselves.

From an anthropological point of view, I think what TV seeks to do is to create a macroculture, i.e., a culture to which all of the viewers will either belong or feel stigmatized. The reason for this? To create a homogenized and simplified market base to which to sell.

Think about the phrase "Must See TV". Why is it "Must See"? There are two implications here...the friendly and the unfriendly. One is you must see it because it's just absolutely fantastic. No one really believes this. The unfriendly reason is that you must see it because if you don't, your friends around the water cooler will think you an alien.

Guess what? You are an alien, or at least, you should be.

 
At 3/29/2006 11:36 AM, Tim said...

It's tempting, especially with children.

I'll have to wait til the Sopranos end, however.

 
At 3/29/2006 11:49 AM, illkudos said...

nice story, old conclusions..

http://daghlian.net/scrapbook/zentv.html
might interest you, came to my mind after reading.

 
At 3/29/2006 11:57 AM, Myles Cochran said...

Welcome aboard the "NO TV FAIRY BOAT TO BETTER LIVING."

I haven't watched TV since the last episode of Seinfeld aired back in '97? About two weeks ago while visiting Cannon Beach, OR, the better half and I rented a room for the evening because the rain from the night before was just too much and we were both a bit cold.

Sitting in the room, we flipped on the TV, which had Free Cable.

After about 5 minutes, I had a headache simply because of all the flashing images. I couldn't keep up with what in the hell I was seeing, and finally turned it off and went for a walk down the misting sidewalk.

Not watching TV is certainly a better way of living, despite what the kids say.

 
At 3/29/2006 12:09 PM, Anonymous said...

That's awesome!! I'm glad I'm not the only one that doesn't pay for cable.
I work with a bunch of people that stop and talk about American Idol. It's quite funny how upset that get when their favorite person gets voted off. I love just walking out of that conversation snickering to myself. At least I didn't waste my time watching idiots trying to get famous.

 
At 3/29/2006 12:45 PM, Anonymous said...

Fantastic post, Irina. Edward Tufte's books are terrific and have made me think to new levels about clarity of information.

There is no difference between a Hyundai and a Mercedes because they are both just cars. Cars are supposed to get us from here to there. But Americans do love their cars and have been convinced by the media that a (better) car is the way to success, happiness and will make you look (and feel) good. And we know it is all about looking and feeling good.

An amusing and true story. My dear brother from out-of-state came to stay at our home one weekend while my wife and I were away. He is always welcome. But he wanted to watch the Red Sox and alas we only have the cheap cable with local channels, because we watch about an hour a month. My brother was not deterred by this and put on his tree climbing gear (he runs a tree cutting business) and climbed up the pole in front of our house and removed the trap from our cable line so he could watch baseball that night. And for the next three months we suddenly had a zillion useless channels. Like new drug addicts my wife and I were drawn into watching hours of trashy TV just because we could. We were saved when the cable company did a random street audit and reinstalled the trap. Now we are back to watching no more than an hour or so every month. We also read a lot and talk to each other.

 
At 3/29/2006 1:01 PM, Anonymous said...

Great Post!

I gave up my TV 10 years ago for a 2 year stretch. I'm currently TV free again going on 3 years. The first time, i lost about 10 pounds (i was already in great shape), read 1 book a week, cooked actual meals, talked to friends in other parts of the country...i had a life, despite a 50hr workweek and long commute. Weird, eh?

following on the comment by the person who said people couldn't understand you'd willingly give up your TV, my parents constantly forget i don't have a TV. They're always saying things like, "oh there's a great program on PBS about ____ tomorrow, you really have to watch it", and then i have to remind them AGAIN that i don't have a TV. This happens about every other week. It's like it's such a weird concept that it can't sink in. Even weirder they're both from that WWII European immigrant generation who always escewed credit cards, excessive spending, etc.etc., so it's not like they're the stereotypical fat beer guzzling american couch potatoes...shows how deep and compelling the TV culture is.

2nd point...here in San Fran we have a lot of great non-profits dedicated to creating affordable housing. I was reading the newsletter from one org that i donate to every year. Typical heartbreaking story about a family which fell on hard times, living on the street; the org eventually places them in one of their renovated, rent subsidized buildings. The article goes on to say that they're really happy to have a great place to live but they're still struggling because of all bills, "rent, groceries, cable"...I couldn't freakin' believe it. Now i'm as far from one of those "drown the gubmint" repugnicans as you can get, I'm all for the social network, and i wish it didn't have to come from private sector efforts like this, but man, my GF and i clear $140k/yr, and WE don't have cable. I mean, how about some financial counciling included with the lowered rent? Or how about not equipping the bldg w. Cable?! It's weird how almost universally, cable is grouped in with food,water and shelter like a necessity.

 
At 3/29/2006 1:17 PM, Son Nguyen said...

There are still good shows/channels for different purposes of your lifestyle. As for me, entertainment (Prison Break, 24), education (Discovery, PBS's NOVA, FrontLine, CBS's 60 Minutes)

But I also agree there are many shows that I do not find useful or worth watching. However, that's just me, one individual, so I don't think people will watch TV any less in the future.

You can spend time surfing the Net and being manipulated by online advertising just in the same way (or even more because online ads can be very targeted, and they understand your behaviors)

My advice: Be aware of the consequences (how you're being manipulated by the media) and act balancely (find time to get out, evaluate different, various viewpoints/explanations)

 
At 3/29/2006 1:32 PM, Katok Haredni said...

You're point is a very good one, and I agree. I don't watch TV anyways.

 
At 3/29/2006 1:46 PM, RonRay said...

You are absolutely right!

I always get the strangest looks when I tell people that I don't watch TV....
Someone will say something about a supposed important current event that was on the local news and I say "I don't watch the news"..... I always get this 2 to 3 second stare like... "What planet are you from?..."

I stopped watching television about the time of the attach on the World Trade Center, because it was just so depressing.
Also, when I compare the news from the Internet (that I choose and dissect), I can really see how much we are being 'controlled'!

I found that my world still rotates just fine without it.
Come to think of it, politician's stupidity is much more obvious and bothers me a lot more now!

 
At 3/29/2006 1:53 PM, Anonymous said...

Fascinating. I ran across an article that parallels this discussion.

 
At 3/29/2006 2:14 PM, Anonymous said...

this is fantastic! thanks, well done.

 
At 3/29/2006 2:19 PM, Anonymous said...

I've been considering it for a very long time as well as studying other culturally hegemonic situations. It is now time for me to go through with it.

 
At 3/29/2006 2:24 PM, Zed said...

This was like a real-life Flowers for Trinitron.

 
At 3/29/2006 2:32 PM, Anonymous said...

Don't just stop watching TV. Kill your TV. It will make you feel better. I smashed my 27" Sony with a big f***ing hammer and I felt instantly relieved. It's a great psychological reminder that you are no longer a slave to the media. That's right... slave, the TV is your chain. But you still wear it don't you? Just say no!

 
At 3/29/2006 2:35 PM, Anonymous said...

Another NYC'er here saying that breaking away from suckiling at the icy teat of TV has been one of the best things I have ever done. It has changed the way I do things, rather than wanting to buy things I am embracing my inborn urge to make stuff instead. In the 5 years I have been without TV my creative impulse to creative output ratio has soared.
Also, it is funny but when I tell folks I don't have a TV the response is generally supprotive. People agree unreservedly that life without TV is appreciably better but they don't go home and trash theirs because they can't imagine what those qualitative changes might be. Weird, people are afraid of free time making them nuts or something.

 
At 3/29/2006 2:42 PM, Anonymous said...

http://www.theory.org.uk/david/effects.htm

 
At 3/29/2006 3:14 PM, Anonymous said...

Yeah! I used to not be able to face the day without my daily dose of TV. Then one day I decided I had had enough of people with faces and voices telling me what to do. Right then and there I signed on the Internet and started posting comments on blogs!

Substituing hypocritical self-congratulation for my empty blathering boob tube, I found whole new worlds of duplicity and elitism to enjoy! I mean, seriously, how cool is that, to find this blog? Thanks, guys!
I can't wait for the echo chamber to slake my appetite for nonsensical rehashed treatises on the modern consumer experience! Keep up the holier than thou work, people! As the kids say, I'm lovin' it!

 
At 3/29/2006 3:27 PM, nobrainer said...

HA!

1. Making you the passive observer of current events.

- the radio does not do this? Better ax that, too.

2. Making you a consumerist whore.

- because radio, internet, DVDs, magazines, newspapers, and TV shows on DVD or internet don't support any advertising or paid product placements that serve to replace commercials. (TV shows are OK, as long as they aren't through cable or on the actual TV?). Ax all those.

3. Distracting you from the real problems.

- see above for # 2. You can read plenty about meaningless things. See, I'm reading and responding to what I think is a pretty ludicrous, and strangely popular, blog post. Besides, spending 4 hours, 162 days a year listening to a baseball game wouldn't distract anyone "from the real problems." I think we'd best ax all the other alternatives and distractions that don't relate to "the real problems."

I agree that people are better off with less TV. But getting rid of it only to replace it with a plethora of what are equivalently bad alternatives achieves nothing.

 
At 3/29/2006 3:35 PM, carolr said...

And I was wondering if our family was the only one in the universe without cable TV. We have been without for a year now and have experienced all of the quizical looks, resistance from the cable company to let us go, and benefits you mentioned. Long live the internet!

 
At 3/29/2006 7:27 PM, Anonymous said...

Hard to believe that no one has pointed sympathetic folks to Adbusters, who can back up every hunch you have about TV sucking you dry.


http://www.adbusters.org

 
At 3/29/2006 9:16 PM, Anonymous said...

I've been cable-TV (and rabbit ear) TV free for several years, after starting to kick the habit by first switching to TIVO (the nicotine gum solution to tv addiction). Since I still buy complete season DVDs it isn't because tv content is so awful, it is that (a) you have to fit your schedule to the shows and (b) the commercialism is insidious and (c) you have to take all the crud channels BEFORE you can take the 3 channels that you actually like. I could never stand news shows, or high advert to content percentage channels anyway, and didn't follow sports. So it was an easy switch.

The household now has 3 of us and we all like this no TV solution. But it doesn't necessarily mean lots of talking. We all sit on the net each evening. I am not sure grazing the internet in an isolated fashion is THAT much of a huge improvement. I would rather the TV time be replaced by book time, but ADD from too many years of channel flipping makes that difficult.

Anyway, yes, the sticky mess in this country can largely be laid at the foot of, or is enabled by, TV. It isnt until you cut the cable do you realize how much consumerist mind manipulation comes into your life that way. For that reason alone it is very good to cut it off.

 
At 3/30/2006 9:37 AM, Eric H said...

Congrats! It has been a couple years at least since I have given up the idiot box, and I have never regretted it. More people need to realize life is too short to stare blankly at moving light (ooOOoh purty pictures!) for hours per day.
GO RIDE A BIKE, FATASS AMERICA!!!

 
At 3/30/2006 10:24 AM, Anonymous said...

As an owner of a Hyundai Accent, I disagree that it is equivalent to a Mercedes....however, the rest of your comments are spot on! (TV-free for about twelve years now....)

 
At 3/30/2006 10:33 AM, Kremmen said...

You hope there will be a massive social and cultural move away from television. Unfortunately, I think it'll happen only to the extent that the replacement activities, such as XBox and downloading movies on the net, still involve sitting on ones arse watch a screen.

US cable TV is certainly good for some vacuous entertainment, but I'm not sure I'd pay for it. For those who mention having no TV, I'd never go that far. There can be a certain cultural sharing via TV. There have always been shows which "everybody" knows and whose catch phrases can still be thrown into conversation decades later: Get Smart, Monty Python, Dr Who, MASH, and a few others. It only comes down to about 20 hours of TV per year, and that rate is falling, but, failing that, what else would I connect my VCR up to?

 
At 3/30/2006 11:21 AM, Sean said...

I cannot believe all of this discussion has not elicited one mention of Postman's "Amusing Ourselves To Death"! Marshall McLuhan's "Understanding Media" is also worth checking into. Both wrote their works awhile ago, (Postman 20 years ago, McLuhan died in ~74). It's scary to read how many of Postman's predictions have come true.

What I find entertaining is that despite 100's of channels at our disposal there's still nothing on. I'm still trying to figure out how we're being sold all the great benefits of digital cable when all it's managed to do is dilute the quality in the name of quantity.

Me? Still have my TV(s) though I gave up cable in June '05 when I moved into my apt. I like to listen to the local news in the morning as I'm trying to get to a waking state. Outside of the occasion college basketball game it's hardly ever on (unless I'm watching a DVD)

 
At 3/30/2006 12:30 PM, bombtea said...

While I can understand the "TV-free-and-lovin'-it" sentiment on this thread, I really don't get why all programming is being hated on. Personally, I don't watch any "pop" TV (Idol, Survivor, Lost, etc.). I think that's just as trashy as reading the Inquirer. But that's not to say I don't watch TV.

I've become increasingly addicted to PBS, from which I've learned more than in many of my university classes. It's not about quitting TV, it's about quitting vacuous, empty TV. There are still a large number of programs that can enlighten as well as entertain. Finding the balance between the two should be the goal, as it seems unlikely that TV will relinquish its stranglehold on American (or Canadian) livingrooms.

 
At 3/30/2006 3:38 PM, Richard said...

Well, I found at least some of the refs I was looking for.

From http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/8Comparison.htm

Average hours spent watching TV per day:
Japan 9:12
United States 7:00
Canada 3:24

And from http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-gunownership.htm

Many sociologists do not consider it an accident that the crime wave that hit America in the 60s and 70s coincided with the first television generation coming of age. Dr. Brandon Centerwall has produced one of the most famous studies, which found that the mere introduction of television into a region causes its crime rate to double as soon as the first television generation comes of age. (1) In a 22-year study of 800 children from grade 2 to early adulthood, Leonard Eron and Rowell Huesmann found that the best predictor of later aggression was a heavy childhood diet of TV violence -- more so than poverty, grades, a single parent in the home or exposure to real violence. (2)

As for Japan? I really couldn't care less about it so the naysayers here could cut me some slacks on 10 year old statistics.

 
At 3/30/2006 10:51 PM, uhclem said...

I cancelled cable about a dozen years ago, with only a brief moment of regret about a year ago. The Cable Company phoned and asked if I was SURE I wanted to cancel as they were about to disconnect. I said WTF and they explained they'd stopped charging me but hadn't actually disconnected the cables...I missed eleven years of free cable.

But aside from that...no regret...

 
At 3/31/2006 7:48 AM, Tim said...

Having not had cable service for the last 3 years I can attest to the observations you made (especially the fact that my "coworkers are obviously idiots"). I'm so sick of the "did you see the latest episode of Lost/America Idol/The Office?" questions. Quite frankly there is more going on in the world than "must see television". I also find that I have a more balanced persepective on current events because I can read multiple points-of-view online rather than be spoonfed my news/opinions by cable news stations. I think Elvis had the right idea when he put a bullet in his TV.

 
At 3/31/2006 9:07 AM, Anonymous said...

We don't have a television. My boyfriend has been TV free for 15 years. After we moved in together I convinced him to buy a television. Two weeks after getting it he sold it - for a profit.

 
At 3/31/2006 11:17 AM, Paul said...

I'm posting from Taiwan, which may well be the TV addiction skid row of the world. Selling my wife on cancelling cable was a lot easier than I thought it was going to be. She just said "ok." I can't believe it. Selling this to my students is going to be a much harder task.

 
At 3/31/2006 1:45 PM, Anonymous said...

Your arguments would hold more weight with me if you'd not arbitrarily call people who do enjoy television idiots. I don't know who you are or where you live, but you sound like an intellectual snob. You might want to check that.

 
At 3/31/2006 2:07 PM, Anonymous said...

This reminds me... I am a returning student in a room full of people ten years behind me in life. These are a significant ten years... they are just out of high school. I mentioned a pedometer I had heard about that makes kids log a certain number of steps which a device then trades for TV time. One of the girls in this class said "That's, like, total child abuse" when confronted with the notion that kids should earn TV time by doing physical activity. She was pretty serious about it.

 
At 3/31/2006 2:10 PM, Anonymous said...

I haven't used TV for a while, but it's about time someone said this.

 
At 4/01/2006 11:43 AM, Anonymous said...

Doesn't the Columbia community do anything but bash TV. :)

Back in fall 1976, when I was a freshman at Columbia, one of my freshman comp assignments involved addressing whether TV constituted an "opiate of the masses."

I see you have an interest in baseball.

I lived in Red Sox Nation for 8 years b4 entering Columbia, but was a Yankees fan. One of my favorite experiences back then occurred in summer 78, when I was working a summer job in New England and the Yankees were in the process of running the Red Sox down. (BTW, this process would have never happened had Dewey Evans not been beaned during that season and been ineffective for several weeks. Best outfield arm in the American League. A crime that he didn't win the 86 series b/c of Schiraldi and Buckner.)

Anyway, I was hitching a ride from my summer job and someone picked me up. First question he asked was:

NOT, "Where are you going."

Rather, it was: "Want to smoke a joint?"

I answered in the affirmative.

While he drove and we smoked, he made it very evident that he was a rabid Red Sox fan. Wouldn't stop discussing their greatness, etc.

B/c he was my ride, I kept silent on that matter.

However, as I departed the car, I said something to the effect that the Yankees were going to catch the Sox.

Yea, I belong in one of the inner circles of Dante's Inferno.

BTW, after experiencing a Steinbrenner overload while living in NYC, I eventually switched over to the Red Sox camp. Which certainly added much aggravation to my life.

 
At 4/01/2006 2:00 PM, kn0thing said...

I know I'm late to comment, but congrats on the quasi-fame that is getting an entry to reddit's top page.

 
At 4/02/2006 4:32 PM, nanc said...

I have lived with out tv twice in my life for 7 years each time and it was blissful. I was more informed and had a lot more fun, not to mention reading some great books and writing some great letters to people I love. (Yes, with a pen, real stamps and envelopes...the whole snail mail thingy.)

Thank you for reminding me that it is time to re-introduce this concept to my family.

Sincerely, nanc66@gmail.com
Let me know if you really want the pamphlet to go out, I would love to have a hand in that project.

 
At 4/02/2006 8:29 PM, Anonymous said...

[I am responding to this post on behalf of my friend, Grizzly Gary, who still maintains the tool of verbal language and wanted to essentially say 'bravo' after I read to him the post; here's his word]: "I dumped the tv a long time ago. Ditto the computer, internet, electricity, and -- to do the Amish one better -- the wheel. Once a mere vestige, the faint spark of the primordial connection with the rest of the universe is now a bonfire as my whole being participates in the dance of life and death. I am nature and she is me. As I look at the smoldering flames at the entrance to my cave, my eyes grow heavy and my being pays homage to the varied species that have danced with me in the hunting fields, providing me with the meat and the clothing for my survival. Amen to the Universe!

 
At 4/03/2006 8:59 AM, Anonymous said...

google is the good search engine.

 
At 6/23/2006 11:18 PM, Anonymous said...

hi i agree you should cancel your cable save that 49.95-59.95 for a farm or a cadillac buy american but also my family has had cable for nearly 30 years on and off we had the box with a dial and the front with dial as slanted back then it was probly 19.95 and we saw mtv and cnn first show but now its gone to pots trying to get the best sponsers for sweeps week month saw you listed on the search engine list

 

<< Home