January
2011
CURRICULUM
VITAE
LARRY
B. HEUER
Ann Whitney Olin Professor
Department of Psychology Telephone (212) 854-7507 (office)
Barnard College (914)
337-4912 (home)
3009 Broadway
Year Institution Degree
Earned
87-90 Northwestern University Post-doctoral Research Fellow
1986 University of Wisconsin-Madison Doctor of Philosophy
Major:
Social Psychology
1983 University of
Wisconsin-Madison Master of Science
Major:
Social Psychology
Minor:
Industrial Relations
1978
Major: Psychology
Academic Appointments
2007-present Ann Whitney Olin Professor of Psychology
2004-present Professor of Psychology
2000-2003 Chair, Department of Psychology
1998-2004 Associate Professor of Psychology
1990-1998 Assistant Professor of Psychology
Academic Awards
and Research Grants
2008 LSE-Columbia Seed Fund Scheme,
Seed Grant (Co-PI Jon Jackson, LSE), $15,000
2006 National Science Foundation, Law
and Social Science Division, Research Grant, $191,098
1997 National Science Foundation, Law
and Social Science Division, Research Grant, $107,429
1993 National Science Foundation, Law
and Social Science Division, Research Grant, $74,800
1989 Northwestern University,
1988 State Justice Institute, Juror
Notetaking and Question Asking: A field experiment,
$111,201
1988 Northwestern University,
1988 Northwestern University, Law and
1987 Society for the Psychological
Study of Social Issues Dissertation Award
1986 American Judicature Society,
Dissertation Grant, $1,500
Teaching
experience
Statistics Graduate
Seminar, Social Conflict
Senior
Seminar
Seminar
on Psychology and Law
Seminar
on the Resolution of Social Conflict
Introduction
to Social Psychology, with laboratory
Introduction to
Psychology
Negotiations Negotiations (
Scholarly
Publications
Heuer,
L., & Stroessner, S. J. (In Press).
The Multi-Value Basis of Procedural Justice. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology.
Heuer, L., & Sivasubramaniam,
D. (In Press). Procedural Justice: Theory and Method. In B.
Rosenfeld & S. Penrod (Eds.), Research Methods in Forensic Psychology. New York: Wiley.
Sivasubramaniam, D. & Heuer, L. (In Press). Procedural justice evaluations in
interrogations. In B. Cutler (Ed.), Conviction of the Innocent: Lessons from
Psychological Research. Washington, DC: APA Press.
Heuer,
L. (2011). Disability and Procedural Fairness in the
Workplace. In R. L. Wiener & S. L. Willborn
(Eds.), Disability and Age
Discrimination: Perspectives in Law and Psychology (pp,
205-234). New York: Springer.
Sivasubramaniam, D. & Heuer, L. (2008). Decision makers and decision recipients: Understanding
disparities in the meaning of fairness. Court Review, 44(1/2), 62-70.
Heuer,
L., Penrod, S., Kattan, A.
(2007). The role of societal benefits and fairness concerns among decision
makers and decision recipients. Law &
Human Behavior, 31, 573-610.
Heuer,
L., Sivasubramaniam, D. (2007). Procedural justice
and the law. In B. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of Psychology and the Law,
Heuer,
L. (2005). What’s just about the
criminal justice system? A psychological perspective. Journal of Law & Policy, 13, 209- 228.
Brockner, J., Heuer, L., Magner, N., Folger, R., Umphress, E., van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Magner, M.,
Siegel, P. (2003). High procedural
fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 91, 51-68.
Heuer,
L. Penrod, S., Hafer, C.,
& Cohn, I. (2002). The role of
resource and relational concerns for procedural justice. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin. 1468 – 1482.
Sunshine, J., & Heuer,
L. (2002). Deservingness and perceptions of procedural justice in citizen
encounters with the police. In M. Ross
& D. T. Miller (Eds). The Justice
Motive in Everyday Life.
Wayte,
T., Samra, J., Robbennolt,
J., Heuer, L., and Koch, W. J. (2001). Psychological issues in civil law. In J. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking Psychology and Law into the 21st
Century.
Robbennolt,
J., Penrod, S. & Heuer,
L. (1999).Assessing and Aiding Jury
Competence. In R. Weiner & Hess (Eds.), Handbook of Forensic Psychology,
2nd Ed.
Heuer
L. Blumenthal, E., Douglas, A., & Weinblatt,
T. (1999). The generality of procedural
justice concerns: A deservedness model
of group value and self-interest based fairness concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,
25 (10), 1279-1292.
Brockner, J., Heuer, L.,
Siegel, P., Wiesenfeld, B., Martin, C., Grover, S.,
Reed, T., & Bjorgvinsson, S. (1998). The moderating effect of self-esteem
in reaction to voice: Converging evidence from four studies. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 394‑407.
Penrod,
S. & Heuer, L.
(1998). Improving group performance: The case of the jury. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac,
F. B. Bryant, Y. Suarez-Balacazar, E. Henderson-King
& J. Meyers (Eds), Theory and Research on
Small Groups.
Penrod,
S. & Heuer,
L. (1997). Tweaking Commonsense: Assessing Aids to Jury Decision Making. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 3,
259‑284.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S.
(1996). Increasing juror participation in trials through note taking and
question asking. Judicature, 79(5),
2-8.
Stroessner, S. J. & Heuer,
L. (1996). A cognitive bias in
procedural justice: The formation and implications of illusory correlations in
perceived intergroup fairness. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 717-728.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. (1994)
Predicting outcomes to disputes:
Consequences for disputant reactions to dispute outcomes and procedures. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
24, 260-283.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. (1994). Juror notetaking
and question asking during trials: A
national field experiment. Law and
Human Behavior, 18(2), 121-150.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. D. (1994). Trial Complexity: A field Investigation of its meaning and its
effects. Law and Human Behavior, 18(1),
29-52.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. D. (1994). Jury decisionmaking
in complex trials. In D.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. D. (1991). Some suggestions for the critical
appraisal of a more active jury. Northwestern
University Law Review, 85(1), 226-239.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Juror questions during trial: Separating myth from reality. The Docket, October.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Instructing jurors: A field
experiment with written and preliminary instructions. Law and Human Behavior, 13,
231-162.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S.
(1988). Increasing jurors' participation in trials: A field experiment
with jury notetaking and question asking. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 409-430.
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S. (1986). Procedural
preference as a function of conflict intensity. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 51, 700-710.
Penrod,
S.,
Sivasubramaniam, D., Heuer, L., Schmidt, H., Silva, H., & Chandhoke, S.
(2010). Interrogators' judgments of
fairness: Factors influencing the use of unfair procedures. American Psychology-Law Society, Vancouver,
Canada.
Sivasubramaniam, D., Heuer, L., Schmidt, H. & Silva, H. (2009). Authorities'
Perceptions of Fairness as a Cause of Wrongful Conviction. American Psychology-Law Society, San
Antonio, TX.
Pechner, M., Fox, C. J., Candon,
E. M., Sivasubramaniam, D., & Heuer,
L. (2008). Impression management and altruistic behavior: Support for a norm of
benevolence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological
Association, Boston, MA.
Hobgood, C. L., Schhmidt,
H. P., Heuer, L. & Sivasubramaniam,
D. (2008). Authority-subordinate disparities in procedural justice judgments:
The role of threat and morality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
Eastern Psychological Association, Boston, MA.
Sivasubramaniam, D., Heuer, L., Becker, S. S., Hobgood,
C. L., & Newkirk, L. (2008). Respect and
Threat: Authority-Subordinate Disparities in Responses to Transgressions. American Psychology-Law Society,
Jacksonville, FL.
Heuer, L., Penrod,
S., Kattan, A., Gottesman,
S. (2005). Evidence concerning the disparate
impact of outcomes versus procedural justice among authorities versus
subordinates. Paper presented at the XVth European Conference on Psychology and Law,
Sgambati,
S., Friedman,
Kattan,
A., Gottesman, S., & Heuer,
L. (2004). Authority-Subordinate Disparities in the Meaning and Importance of
Procedural Fairness. Paper presented at
the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association,
Heuer,
L., Penrod, S., Tyler, T., Eckberg,
D., & Podkopaz, M. (2004). Testing the Role of
Procedural Fairness for Satisfaction and Compliance with the Law: Two
Experiments in a District Court. American Psychology-Law Society,
Heuer, L., Kattan, A., & Penrod, S.
(2003). Authority-subordinate disparities in the meaning and importance of
procedural fairness. Paper presented at
the APLS/EAPL International Interdisciplinary Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Heuer,
L., & Stroessner, S. (2003). Testing
a multi-motivational model of procedural fairness. Paper presented at the Justice Pre-Conference
of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Los
Angeles, CA.
Brockner,
J., Magner, N., Magner, M.,
& Heuer, L. (2000). Towards a dual purpose sensemaking model of procedural fairness. Paper presented
at the
Heuer,
L., & Sunshine, J. (2000). Deservingness and perceptions of procedural
justice. Paper presented at the Biennial
Conference of the International Society for Justice Research, Rishon LeZion, Israel.
Heuer,
L., Kattan, A., Sun, T., & Anderson, L. (2000). A multi-motive model of relational concerns in
conflict. Paper presented at the
American Psychology-Law Biennial Conference, New Orleans, LA.
Heuer,
L. (1999). In the Matter of the Merits of Adversary
versus Inquisitorial Legal Systems:
Pre-trial Statement for Testimony Regarding Procedural Justice. Paper presented at the special session on
Adversary vs. Inquisitorial Procedures (The Dublin Trial), AP-LS, EAP&L
International Conference, Dublin, Ireland.
Heuer,
L., Penrod, S., Gefen, S. ,
&
Heuer,
L. (1998). Control and Symbolic Measures
in Procedural Justice. In M. A. Small (Chair), Use and Misuse of Psychology
in Justice Studies. Symposium
conducted at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association,
Heuer,
L., Gefen, S., Penrod, S.,
& Saks, M. (1998). Procedural justice from the perspective of
authorities versus subordinates.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress of
Applied Psychology,
Heuer,
L., Stroessner, S., & Vale, L. W.
(1998). Then role of multiple
motives for justice judgments: Extending
the Group Value Model. Paper
presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Justice
Research, Denver, CO.
Vale, L., & Heuer,
L. (1998). Multiple motives and the Group Value
theory. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the American Psychological Society,
Heuer,
L. & Gefen, S.
(1998). Perceptions of
procedural fairness: Authorities versus subordinates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Psychological Society,
Siegel, P., Brockner, J. & Heuer,
L. (1997). The effects of process control, decision
control, and self‑esteem on reactions to social encounters. Paper to be presented at the annual Meeting
of the
Heuer,
L., Douglas, A. & Weinblatt, T. (1997).
Deservedness judgments in procedural fairness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
Eastern Psychological Association,
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S.
(1996). Instrumental versus
relational concerns in authorities=
procedural evaluations: Judicial decisionmaking in
fourth amendment cases.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological
Society,
Heuer,
L & Penrod, S.
(1996). The role of fairness
concerns in judicial decision making. Paper presented at the annual meeting
of the Eastern Psychological Association,
Heuer,
L. & Cohn, I. (1995). Procedural preferences for rights
complaints: A test of a contextual
priming model of procedural fairness.
Paper presented at the biannual meeting of Political Psychology,
Heuer,
L. & Cohn, I. (1995). Salvadorans=
procedural preferences for rights complaints:
A test of a contextual priming model of procedural fairness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of
the Law and Society Association,
Heuer,
L., Gross, E., Scelfo, J. & Stroessner, S. (1995).
Procedural fairness evaluations:
A test of a contextual priming model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
American Psychological Society,
Heuer,
L., Penrod, S., Eng, S.
& DeBlass, R.
(1995). Lineup Charades: Police cues to eyewitnesses about suspect
presence in lineups. Paper presented
at the European Conference on Law and Psychology,
Heuer,
L., Scelfo, J., Gross, E., Edelman, D., Penrod, S., Stroessner, S. J., &
Stroessner, S. J., & Heuer,
L. (1995). Illusory correlations in perceived fairness:
Evidence of a compensatory bias.
Paper presented at the American Psychological Society annual meeting,
Stroessner, S. J. & Heuer,
L. (1994). Consequences of illusory correlation in
judgments of justice. Paper
presented at the Society for Experimental Social Psychology annual meeting,
Stroessner, S. J., & Heuer,
L. (1993). Illusory correlations in perceptions of
fairness. Paper presented at the Society for Experimental Social Psychology
Annual Meeting,
Heuer,
L., & Blumenthal, E. (1993). The generality of procedural fairness
concerns: Qualifying conditions for the
self-interest and group value theories.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological
Association,
Tunick,
W., & Heuer, L.
(1993). The development of
distributive and procedural justice.
Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological
Association,
Stroessner, S., & Heuer,
L. (1993). Illusory correlations and procedural
justice. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the Society of Experimental Social Psychologists,
Heuer,
L., & Penrod, S.
(1992). Trial complexity,
trial procedures, and jury performance:
A field experiment. Paper
presented at the Third European Conference of Law and Psychology,
Penrod,
S., & Heuer, L.
(1992). The nature of trial
complexity. Paper presented at the
Society for the Reform of Criminal Law,
Heuer,
L. & Valley, K. (1992). Theoretical perspectives on procedural choice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
International Association for Conflict Management,
Penrod,
S., Borgida, E., & Heuer,
L. (1992). Social psychology in court: Two field experiments. Paper presented at the Joint Meeting of the
European Association of Social Psychology and The Society of Experimental
Social Psychology,
Heuer,
L., & Penrod, S.
(1992). Trial complexity: An empirical investigation of its meaning and
its effects. Paper presented at the
biennial meeting of the American Psychology and Law Society,
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S.
(1990). Juror notetaking and question asking: A field experiment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
Law and Society Association,
Heuer,
L. (1989). The psychology of disputant procedural
preferences. Paper presented at the
1989 meeting of the Conference for Employee -Responsibilities and Rights,
Heuer,
L. & Tyler, T. R. (1989). Judicial decision making in cases
regarding the prediction of criminality:
The influence of procedural and distributive concerns. Paper presented at the 1989 meeting of the
Law and Society Association,
Heuer,
L. & Penrod, S.
(1987). The role of decision
control for disputant satisfaction with dispute resolution procedures. Midwestern Psychological Association,
Chicago.
Heuer,
L., & Penrod, S. (1985). A decade of procedural justice
research: Progress and prospects. American Psychological
Association,
Heuer,
L., & Penrod, S. (1984). A field experiment
on juror decisionmaking. American
Psychological Association,
Heuer,
L., Penrod, S., & DuFore,
S. (1984). Factors influencing preference for dispute
resolution procedures. Midwestern
Psychological Association, Chicago.
Penrod,
S., Coates, D.,
Coates, D., Atkinson, M., Heuer,
L.,
Heuer,
L. (1982). Preference for plea bargaining as a dispute
resolution procedure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
Law and Society Association,
Heuer,
L. (1982). Preference for a dispute resolution procedure as a
function of negotiability of conflict, motivational orientation, case strength
and time pressure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the
Midwestern Psychological Association,
Penrod,
S.,
Invited Talks
Law and
Psychology Conference on Disability and Aging, University of Nebraska, Lincoln,
November, 2008
Psychology and
Social Justice Conference, The New School for Social Research, New York, NY,
April 2008
California Bench Bar Biannual
Conference, Anaheim, CA, September 2007
Department of Psychology, Fordham
University, Bronx, NY, April, 2006
Center for the Study of Law, Language,
and Cognition,
Department of Organization Management,
Minnesota District Court Judges
Association,
Hennepin
Department of Psychology, Brock
University, Ontario, Canada, 2000.
Plenary Address, International Society
for Justice Research, Denver, CO, May, 1998.
Department of Psychology,
American Inns of Court, National
Convention,
American Bar Foundation, National
Convention,
Manuscripts in
preparation or under Review
Hafer, C., & Heuer, L. (Under Review). From
Weird to Revered: An Alternative Interpretation of
Evidence for a Prescriptive Norm of Self-Interest.
Sivasubramaniam,
D. & Heuer, L., & Hafer,
C. (In Preparation).
A norm of self-interest or a norm of benevolence? Perceived altruism
creates favorable impressions
Reviewing, Editorial Boards, and Professional
Affiliations
Editorial Board, Law and Human Behavior (APA Division
41 Publication) 2003 – present
Editorial
Board,
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law (2006 - present)
Ad hoc reviewer
Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology Behavioral
Sciences and the Law
Psychology,
Crime, and Law National
Science Foundation
Law
and Society Review Journal
of Applied Social Psychology
Political
Psychology Journal
of Experimental Social Psychology
Journal of Applied Psychology
Treasurer, International Society for Justice Research, (March, 2007 – 2010)
Chair, Department of Psychology (2000 –
2003; 2009-present)
Co-Chair, Barnard
Institutional Review Board, 2006-present)
Chair, APA Division 41 Grants‑in‑Aid
Committee (1996 - 1997)