Camejo and Shawki
Posted to www.marxmail.org on
Last night I attended the
The ISO is probably the largest socialist group in the
It has been rather successful over the past few years in
general socialist outreach and participation in the mass movements. The
chairperson at the plenary announced that 500 people had shown up for the
conference. To my eyes most seemed to be under 30 and included lots of college
students. I was also struck by the presence of more than a handful of
African-Americans. My guess is that the desire to be connected to a socialist
formation overrides Black nationalist and separatist
impulses in a period of rising capitalist crisis--especially when the
traditional "radical" Black movement has become an appendage of the
Kerry campaign.
Camejo's talk was a combination of
his stump campaign speech and observations geared to the socialist audience,
which was obviously as fond of him as the American SWP rank-and-file was back
in the period before he was expelled for challenging the party's sectarian
course.
The campaign portion of his speech focused on the cognitive
dissonance aspect of support for Kerry. You have a situation in which the
beliefs and desires of the people voting for him runs counter to his professed
goals around a range of questions, including most importantly the war in
The openly socialist portion of his speech addressed what
Peter saw as mounting contradictions in the world capitalist economy. I
certainly hope that the ISO will transcribe and publish his remarks because I
can hardly do them justice. He pointed to the likelihood that the
Both Shawki and Camejo emphasized
that in a period of deepening economic crisis, it will matter little to the
average working person what Peter Coyote or Medea
Benjamin wrote in 2004 (who now apparently regrets supporting Nader in 2000).
For somebody facing eviction or unemployment, they will remember who defied the
TINA political consensus framed by the 2-party system and who stood up for
working people, not left-of-center celebrities. This has been the main reason
people such people voted for Nader. It is also the challenge to the Green
Party, to decide whether it will be a middle-class party that compromises with
the billionaire war-makers in both parties or one
creating alternatives to the system.
For those who think that the Green Party will be the vehicle
for the ultimate social and economic emancipation of the
Last night was the first chance I heard to hear Shawki speak. In comparison to the SWP leaders I remember
with some ambivalence, he comes across as a much more modest figure. I suspect
that his relative youth in and of itself would have to make him less cocky. In
a pitch perhaps to veterans of 1960s type sects like me, he emphasized that it
is not inevitable that socialist groups will heap recriminations on critics of
the party line. He believed that the ISO was conscious of such problems and
would avoid them. My own take on the matter is that this is a question of
methodology rather than good intentions.
Shawki had some interesting
observations on an ABB-like outlook popping up in
As the extreme left lowers its profile and as the
left-center and traditional right parties continue to attack the living
standards of working people, it is inevitable that the extreme right parties
will begin to gain in influence as they use radical sounding demagogy. Although
we are obviously not in as extreme a crisis as in the 1930s, this kind of
"lesser evil" logic has been historically proven to lead to the
triumph of fascism. It is incumbent on radicals to avoid this temptation and
speak up as forcibly and as visibly as possible for a class alternative to
capitalist politicians and programs.