Posted to www.marxmail.org on April 28, 2006
Yesterday there was a picket line at the front gate of
Shouting slogans and
waving signs, opponents of
A crowd that peaked at
nearly 200 circled behind police barricades, chanting variations of “
Full: http://www.columbiaspectator.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2006/04/28/4451ce582a9cb
This is not the first time that
Now, nearly 30 years later, another imperialist war is
happening and another racist expansion is planned. Lacking the irritant of a
draft, however, I would believe that
I have worked at Columbia University since 1990 and have watched the institution become more and more aggressive in its bid to compete with NYU within the city and with the Ivy's beyond the city In fact my department was scheduled to have moved to the Manhattanville campus over 2 years ago, but community resistance has put this move and all others on hold.
Last April a document was uncovered that detailed the university's plans to spend $300,000 on a consulting project to determine whether the law of eminent domain could be applied to the Manhattanville land grab. The university tried to assure the community that this would be a "last resort".
For me the interesting question, which does not really surface that much in discussions around the proposed expansion, is what forces are driving the university to compete with other institutions. Listening to President Bollinger, it is almost a case of penis envy:
"As alumni know only too well,
Full: http://www.campus-watch.org/article/id/1174
I have seen the same empire-building tendencies at work at
my alma mater
Probably the most extreme example of using a business model
for university expansion was Larry Summers' tenure at
In July 2001 the former head of the World Bank became President of Harvard with a mandate to expand:
Lawrence H. Summers
today starts what many think will be a defining and controversial presidency of
Harvard University, a run likely to alter not only education on campus but also
the landscape of
As he takes the helm
of a university with wealth and power unprecedented in higher education, Summers by all accounts wants to dynamite the slow-moving
Harvard culture that might stall his academic reforms and ventures. A Harvard
economics professor in the 1980s, and treasury secretary during the
"This is a huge
moment of opportunity for Harvard, and it's very important that we take
advantage of it," Summers said.
But his biggest impact
may be well outside Harvard Yard. With the university now owning more land in
Barring an economic
crisis, campus sources say, members of Harvard's governing corporation are
inclined toward rapid development of their huge acreage in Allston by moving
prestigious professional schools across the river - including the Law School
and the John F. Kennedy School of Government - and by making a push for
prominence in the sciences by building a research park that includes academic
programs, business incubators, and museums.
Since universities are by definition nonprofits, one wonders
why there is such a driving need to follow what is basically the business model
of a capitalist firm. As we know from reading the business press, big
corporations are under tremendous pressure to add new lines of business and
increase volume. But why can't
You can find answers to this question in a perceptive article titled "The Corporate University in American Society" by David Schultz that appeared in Logos Journal: http://www.logosjournal.com/issue_4.4/schultz.htm. He writes:
Higher education in
Yet while for much of
their existence colleges and universities have managed to hold these twin
imperatives in balance, political-economic forces such as globalization, an
increasingly conservative political agenda, and a tightening of public
financial support for higher education have tipped the balance, resulting in
the emergence of the corporate university.
As corporatized entities, American colleges
and universities are under increasing pressure to emulate other market
participants and operate in ways that affect their governance and structure, as
well as how they generate revenue. The
result is that the new corporate university seeks to jettison many of the traditional
manifestations of higher education, such as tenure, academic freedom, and
shared governance, and replace them with a business model of management and
more adjunct faculty who are viewed as mere employees. The need to do this is simple—less revenue to
support colleges and universities is coming from the government, thereby
forcing higher education to reduce labor costs and also seek financial support
from private sector investors who view the traditional mission of these schools
with suspicion.
In December 1980, Congress passed the Bayh-Dole
bill which gave universities the right to profit from patents on products
developed within the institution. As the inventor of numerous pharmaceuticals,
Ultimately, the ties between the university and the
corporate world go back to WWII when governments turned to the university to
help provide the technologies that would win the war. After all, it was