Letter to Paul Krugman on
immigration
Posted to www.marxmail.org on March 27, 2006
Dear Paul Krugman,
I was dumbfounded to read your op-ed piece in the NY Times today echoing many of the themes of the nativist right.
You refer to a number of "facts" that should strengthen the case for a "need to reduce the inflow of low-skill immigrants." They include:
1. A questioning of the economic benefits immigrants bring to the economy, which in your estimation has raised the total income of native-born Americans by no more than a fraction of 1 percent since 1980.
2. An assertion that immigrant workers have depressed the wages of unskilled native-born workers, such as U.S. high school dropouts, who would earn as much as 8 percent more if it weren't for Mexican immigration.
3. Worries about low-skill immigrants threatening to unravel
the safety net of the
Although I understand that you have earned many awards for
your writings and have been appointed to some of the most prestigious
universities in the
Fundamentally, immigration is a result of too few jobs in
And why have jobs disappeared in
Turning the clock back 6 years to July 5, 2000, you wrote a
column hailing the election of Vicente Fox which you described as a "cause
for rejoicing, not just for
Turning the clock back another 3 years to February 13, 1997,
we find you boosting globalization just like your colleague Tom Friedman. In
making your own case for "the world is flat," you scoff at worries
about job loss in the
"Of course, international competition plays a role in some downsizings, but as Newsweek's list makes clear, it is hardly the most important cause of the phenomenon. To my knowledge there are no Japanese keiretsu competing to carry my long-distance calls or South Korean conglomerates offering me local service. Nor have many Americans started buying their home appliances at Mexican stores or smoking French cigarettes."
However, this is a rather U.S.-centric view of the problem
which ignores the impact of globalization on other countries. By focusing on
whether Americans will buy home appliances at Mexican stores, you seem to miss
the other side of the equation, namely the impact of free trade *inside*
An October 30, 2005 St. Louis Post-Dispatch article filled in the details that were woefully neglected in your op-ed pieces:
Alonzo Moran earns
more money driving a fork-lift in a cotton gin in
But after 13 months as
a migrant farm worker, Moran is eager to return to the 30 acres he owns in the
Mexican state of Tamaulipas.
There, his land lies
fallow, not worth planting because of depressed corn prices he blames on the
North American Free Trade Agreement.
"What is my dream
for the future? I want corn prices to be high again so I can go back to
There are many reasons
for the recent record migration from
A favorite destination
is
Many stay. From 2000
to 2004 alone,
And those are just the
Hispanics who get counted.