Letter to Bill Weinberg
posted
to www.marxmail.org on
Dear Bill Weinberg,
I assume that you are the author of the article titled "How the Antiwar Movement Was Blowing It" (http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20031020/025813.html) that was just forwarded to Doug Henwood's listserv by a Mr. Chuck Zero, an anarchist ubiquitous to the non-Marxist leftwing of the Internet who named himself after Subcommandante Zero as I understand it. I myself am named after my grandfather Louis Proyect, although he was known as Lebel Proyect.
I also assume that you are the host of the anarchist
talk-show Moorish Orthodox Radio Crusade that comes on Tuesday at
By the way, I have never been able to figure out the connection between anarchism and the Moorish empire, but perhaps that's because I am usually asleep not a half-hour into your show. I also want to commend you for your excellent website titled World War Three Report at http://www.ww3report.com/. It is chock-full of useful information and written with lots of radical flair and panache. If I weren't already committed to Marxism, I might find myself seduced by your message--especially if I were first coming around politics and looking for something really exciting and different.
That being said, I am rather perplexed by your statement:
Sound-bight [sic]
pseudo-analysis is an inherent danger of activism, which must be guarded
against at all times. Slogans like "Bring the troops home" and
"US out of
I was always under the impression that anarchists were in favor of immediate communism like the day before yesterday. Right? How does that square with worrying about the responsibilities of an occupying power? In fact, in my humble bronto-Marxist opinion, one nation occupies another only as a function of the violation of international law. But, hey, what do I know. I still like Lenin.
You also ask what happened to CARDRI:
Whatever happened to
CARDRI, the Committee Against Repression and for Democratic Rights in
It appears that CARDRI has morphed into something called
INDICT. If you go to opendemocracy.net, a website edited by Todd Gitlin and funded by The Rockefeller Foundation and the
Bank of Sweden among others, you'll find an effusive piece on INDICT which is
pushing for a war crime tribunal on
INDICT'S president is Ann Clwyd, a
Blairite MP, who was praised on William J. Bennett's
website www.empoweramerica.org for her all-out support for the war in Iraq, and
formerly the President of CADRI. Her board includes Peter Galbraith, the former
Ann Clwyd is a pretty good
fund-raiser, according to opendemocracy.org. She got her hands on $3 million
under the Iraq Liberation Act passed by the US Congress in 1998. I used to have
lots more trouble raising money for
Follow-up posted on
It turns out that Weinberg's support for the occupation of
http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=03/10/24/7842430
I love this one especially:
so is Weinberg the proponent of anarchist
colonialism? :) bring the poor savages to modernity nicely through the
international law for states and ruling classes? what
are "freedom-hating jihadis"? Must be part
of his crusade fantasy.
Meanwhile, Weinberg has written another article that is meant as some kind of apology. You can read it in its entirety on Henwood's list at:
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20031027/026182.html
It repeats previous complaints against the WWP, which are virtually identical to those that can be read from Nation Magazine hacks like David Corn or on salon.com but tries to mollify his anarchist pals with claims that he is not really an imperialist mouthpiece.
I do want to hone in one item, however, that apparently has gotten under Weinberg's skin sufficiently for him to defend himself in a manner of speaking. Under bullet 2, he replies to the charge that he is a government agent. He says:
"This accusation borders on the hilarious, given that I
have spent the last several months risking my butt to report on US
imperialism's war crimes in
One would hope that given this reasonable stance that
Weinberg might remove a document from his website written by fellow anarchist
Manny Goldstein titled "THE MYSTERIOUS RAMSEY CLARK: STALINIST DUPE OR
RULING-CLASS SPOOK?" which has been making the rounds in anarchist
cyber-circles for years now. Among other things, it condemns
This, plus the fact that both Clark and his father were high officials in the Justice Department, apparently leads Goldstein to say the following:
"Take a close look and there is something downright
suspicious about former Attorney General Ramsey Clark, now the darling of
certain sectors of the radical left. His journey has taken him from the heights
of federal power to outer orbits of the political fringe. In the process, he
has seemingly transformed from a shill for the most corrupt elements of the
"What is Ramsey Clark: dupe, kook or spook? Has a
well-intentioned but none-too-bright
"You decide."
Okay, I will decide. Manny Goldstein is a god-damned
snitch-jacket punk and Bill Weinberg is a horse's ass for circulating this kind
of garbage.