The
Posted to www.marxmail.org on March 24, 2006
The latest London Review of Books has an article by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt titled "The Israel Lobby." It and the longer paper that is based on has generated some controversy. The London Review article argues:
"[T]he thrust of US policy in the region derives almost entirely from domestic politics, and especially the activities of the ‘Israel Lobby’. Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that US interests and those of the other country – in this case, Israel – are essentially identical."
Full: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/mear01_.html
This argument has been heard before. Although it superficially sounds "radical", it is most often heard from paleoconservatives like Pat Buchanan who also sparked controversy in the 1980s for making similar arguments.
In the most recent development, Alan Dershowitz has become the main antagonist of Mearsheimer and Walt (who is on the faculty at Harvard with Dershowitz) in terms depressingly similar to the Norman Finkelstein controversy:
A prominent Harvard
law professor, Alan Dershowitz, is alleging that the authors of a Harvard
Kennedy School paper about the "Israel lobby," one of which is the
Kennedy School's academic dean, culled sections of the paper from neo-Nazi and
other anti-Israel hate Web sites.
"What we're
discovering first of all is that the quotes that they use are not only wrenched
out of context, but they are the common quotes that appear on hate sites,"
Mr. Dershowitz, who is identified in the paper as part of the "lobby,"
told The New York Sun yesterday.
"The wrenching
out of context is done by the hate sites, and then [the authors] cite them to
the original sources, in order to disguise the fact that they've gotten them
from hate sites."
Full: http://www.nysun.com/pf.php?id=29741
It is understandable why somebody like Dershowitz might
become so upset. When professors from prestigious universities publish a
lengthy attack on
Before examining Mearsheimer and Walt's arguments, it might be worthwhile to put them into context ideologically. Both men subscribe to "realist" theory, which falls within the international relations (IR) branch of political science. This term is related to "realpolitik," the word coined by Bismark that obviously described the way that another realist Henry Kissinger conducted foreign policy.
"States are assumed at a minimum to want to ensure their own survival. This driving force of survival is the primary factor influencing their behaviour and in turn ensures states develop offensive military capabilities, as a mean to increase their relative power. Neorealists bring attention to a persistent lack of trust between states which requires states to be on guard and act in an overtly aggressive manner."
Full: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neorealism
To some extent, it is difficult to predict how realist scholars will apply their theories to the world of practical politics. One realist, E.H. Carr, had a career that defied conventional anti-Communist expectations while another, George Kennan, exemplified professional anti-Communism.
Mearsheimer was opposed to the invasion of
The London Review article is filled with "realist" reasoning, such as the following:
"One might argue that
I am not sure what kind of argument this is, at least in
terms of accepted progressive thinking. Soviet "expansion" in the
region amounted to support for half-hearted nationalist regimes such as
Mearsheimer and Walt are very much into quantitative analysis, seeing the strategic value of a state in terms of dollars and cents:
"Backing
However, it is difficult to quantify the impact of
In other respects, the article helps to expose Israeli pretensions. By quoting from the Zionist leaders themselves, the authors allow them to hoist themselves on their own petard. For example, they quote David Ben-Gurion's words to Nahum Goldmann, the president of the World Jewish Congress:
"If I were an Arab leader I would never make terms with
Apparently, Dershowitz did a little bit of detective work and came to the conclusion that the authors were prowling around neo-Nazi websites. Quoting from the NY Sun article once again:
Under the section
"Manipulating the Media," on pages 19 and 20 of the paper [a
reference to the longer paper the article is based on, which is at: http://ksgnotes1.harvard.edu/Research/wpaper.nsf/rwp/RWP06-011/$File/rwp_06_011_walt.pdf],
Messrs. Walt and Mearsheimer write: "In his memoirs, for example, former
Times executive editor Max Frankel acknowledged the impact his own pro-Israel
attitude had on his editorial choices. In his words: 'I was much more deeply
devoted to
Yet the Frankel quote used by Messrs. Mearsheimer and Walt, Mr. Dershowitz said, is nearly identical to the quote used by a neo-Nazi Web site in its own take on Jewish press influence, "Jewish Influence in the Mass Media." The document, posted on Holywar.org, quotes more extensively from the same section in Mr. Frankel's memoir.
In terms of the detective work, Dershowitz neglects to
mention that Frankel's quote can be found in Canadian Dimension, a socialist
magazine that I have written for over the past 10 years or so, as well as Indymedia outlets. This is a rather pointless exercise. Neo-Nazi
websites will quote practically anybody who has been critical of
The more interesting question for Marxists and radicals such
as us is how to weigh the role of the Israeli lobby or any other factor for
that matter in analyzing
To begin with, it is important to make a distinction between Marxism and economic determinism which are really two different things. For example, Charles A. Beard's "An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution" is a classic in this vein. It examines the constitution as a kind of compromise between conflicting economic interests. Sometimes Marxist literature, especially vulgar Marxist literature, reads this way.
However, Marxism has always understood that ideas can become part of the objective conditions of society--as much as the mode of production--through the heavy weight of tradition. For example, there is no economic basis for homophobia in the same narrow sense as racism, but that does not mean that the U.S. will allow gay marriage any time in the near future no matter how many gay conservatives argue for how it makes sense economically.
You also have to reckon with the element of irrationality
which seeps into any capitalist system in decline, like Nazi Germany or the
Until we have access to the secret files of the national
security state, it will be impossible to "prove" why the