Thomas Brown and the bastard Piscataways
posted
to www.marxmail.org on
We make our debut in
the far west, where the snowy mountains look down upon us in the hottest summer
day as well as in the winter's cold; here where a few months ago the wild
beasts and wilder Indians held undisturbed possession - where now surges the
advancing wave of Anglo Saxon enterprise and civilization; where soon we fondly
hope will be erected a great and powerful state, another empire in the
sisterhood of empires...
Fondly looking forward
to a long and pleasant acquaintance with our readers, hoping well to act our
part, we send forth to the world the first number of the Rocky Mountain News.
--Rocky Mountain News,
To give you an idea of how shameless this disgusting rag is, they include this openly racist crap on their website: (http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/aboutus/creekjoa.shtml)
The newspaper's founder was one William T. Byers. Showing
that he was dead serious about the advancing wave of Anglo-Saxon civilization
subduing the wild Indians, he called for the extinction of the
This rancid newspaper has basically been leading the campaign to fire Ward Churchill. If you go to the Rocky Mountain News website, you will find 139 (!) items that mention Ward Churchill. The charges against him are now focusing on his academic credentials, since it is becoming obvious that it is not possible to fire somebody for making unpopular comments about 9/11.
It should also be noted that the
"Newly released documents show that a vice chancellor
at
Colorado Indynews reports that Caplis was paid off to attack Ward Churchill:
An anonymous tipster
working with, what was referred to as, a “faith-based think tank”, claims that
KHOW/Clear Channel’s Dan Caplis accepted a “gift”
from the unnamed group to spread the biased Ward Churchill story in an attempt
to “frame the left”, the anti-war movement, and the 9-11 truth movement into
“one package”. The person also stated this was a ploy to set-up an “Ideological
Enemy” on “American Soil” and to re-invent Ward Churchill as a “sacrificial
lamb”
full: http://colorado.indymedia.org/feature/display/10164/index.php
Of particular use to the Rocky Mountain News is the article
by Thomas Brown that has circulated widely on the Internet, which charges
Churchill with not substantiating allegations that the
Thomas Brown, a
professor of sociology at Lamar University, has written a paper that outlines
what looks like a more conventional form of academic fraud on Churchill's part.
According to Brown, Churchill fabricated a story about the U.S. Army
intentionally creating a smallpox epidemic among the Mandan tribe in 1837, by
simply inventing almost all of the story's most crucial facts, and then
attributing these "facts" to sources that say nothing of the kind.
It should be mentioned that
So we are talking about a rather well-organized cabal at
this point, involving the
Recently Brown joined Doug Henwood's LBO-Talk mailing list to make his case. (I should mention that whatever my disagreements with Henwood in the past, he has played a very positive role in stressing the "an injury to one is an injury to all" nature of the Ward Churchill controversy.) When asked by Henwood why he chose to launch his assault on Churchill at the very moment this carefully orchestrated neo-McCarthyite attack was being organized, Brown gave a highly revealing reply, which can be read in its entirety at http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/pipermail/lbo-talk/Week-of-Mon-20050214/003589.html:
Brown writes, "I made the essay public now as a gift to the left, so that it would not be necessary to line up behind Churchill on the free speech issue." With gifts like this, one might actually prefer a smallpox blanket. You can get vaccinated against smallpox; it is much more difficult to protect oneself against McCarthyism.
When he characterized Ward Churchill's politics as
"irredentist" on LBO-Talk, Charles Brown [no relation, as Charles was
anxious to point out] questioned the relevance of this term to land claims by
American Indians. The irredenta included Trentino,
Today, it is a term that has largely reactionary
connotations. That Brown would apply it to a movement that, for example, fought
for control over the
Although Brown fancies himself as some kind of expert on American Indian affairs, nearly everything he writes is tainted. In a paper on his website (http://hal.lamar.edu/~BROWNTF/PISCATAWAY.HTML) titled "Ethnic Identity Movements and the Legal Process: The Piscataway Revival," Brown seems consumed with the need to sniff out the true racial make-up of the Piscataways, something that is consistent with his burning desire to prove that Ward Churchill is not a real Indian. He writes:
A comprehensive
examination of the
There are only four
cases of free servant women charged with bearing bastards by Indians on the
Western Shore (and some of these may well be East Indians, not native American
Indians). These women were given the lesser charge of fornication. Thus when Wesort progenitors were charged with bastardy
instead of fornication, and punished accordingly, it is a clear indication that
the father was a slave--not an Indian. And no Piscataways
were enslaved. In fact, none of the Wesort
progenitors were ever identified as Indians in the colonial records. The
courts' treatment of the Wesort progenitors'
mixed-race unions in the bastardy proceedings clearly
indicate that they involve people of African and European descent, and not
Indians.
My goodness, all this talk about bastardy and fornication. One imagines that if
fascism ever comes to the