Jeffrey Hatcher (Ph.D. 2007, Anthropology)
(co-advised
by Don Melnick)

Relating Paternity and Population
Genetics in Blue Monkeys,
Cercopithecus mitis stuhlmanni: Empirical Results and
Strategies for Obtaining Them
The same programs were used
for
simulations to evaluate the utility of laboratory methods for use in
software
for both analyzing paternity (CERVUS) and inbreeding (GENEPOP).
Simulations
were also used to evaluate the potential for the study population to
show a
relationship between patterns of non-random paternity to changes in
gene
frequencies over generations.
Results of simulations were
compared to
empirical data derived from the Isecheno study site in the Kakamega
Forest,
Kenya. They showed that the number of genotyped loci had inadequate
statistical
power for paternity assignment, especially in light of incomplete
candidate
sampling and genotyping. Nevertheless, estimates of relative
reproductive
success suggest that resident males sire more offspring in the study
groups
than do non-residents, although the latter may account collectively for
about
one half of the offspring sired. It also appears that the study
population is
not optimal, by itself, to discern the full potential of social systems
to
affect genetic evolution.
Population
genetics analyses
of
inbreeding coefficients and correlations between paternal allele
distributions
of offspring and allele distributions of the total male population
revealed a
detectable but slight relationship between social organization, male
reproductive success, and genetic structure.