Convergence

Robert J. Barro and Xavier X. Sala-i-Martin

Journal of Political Economy; v100 n2 April 1992, pp. 223- 51.

Abstract

A key economic issue is whether poor countries or regions tend to grow faster than rich ones: are there automatic forces that lead to convergence over time in the levels of per capita income and product? We use the neoclassical growth model as a framework to study convergence across the 48 contiguous U.S. states. We exploit data on personal income since 1840 and on gross state product since 1963. The U.S. states provide clear evidence of convergence, but the findings can be reconciled quantitatively with the neoclassical model only if diminishing returns to capital set in very slowly. The results for per capita GDP from a broad sample of countries are similar if we hold constant a set of variables that proxy for differences in steady-state characteristics.

Descriptors

General Aggregative Models: Neoclassical (New Classical), E130. Personal Income and Wealth Distribution, D310. General Spatial Economics: Analysis of Growth, Development, and Changes, R110. Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity (economic geography), R120. Macroeconomic Theory--General, 0230. National Wealth and Balance Sheets, 2240. Income Distribution, 2213. Urban Economics and Public Policy, 9310. Regional Economic Studies, 9412. Theory of Regional Economics, 9411. Economic Geography, 7310.