Spring
Decision
Analysis for Clinical and Public Health Practices
Y. Claire
Wang, M.D., Sc.D.
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This course is designed to provide an
introduction to the methods and growing range of applications of decision
analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care technology assessment,
medical decision making, and health resource allocation.
Course requirements:
1.
Class
attendance and participation
2.
Case
assignments
3.
A brief essay
(research article critique)
4.
Final
examination
PREREQUISITES
An introductory course in biostatistics
is a prerequisite, but may be taken concurrently. Introductory economics may be
helpful but is not required.
COURSE LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Students who successfully complete this
course will be able to:
§ Identify and describe the uses and limitations of
these techniques.
§ Critique and apply these methods in decision making
under uncertainty in health policy and patient care.
§ Master a set of basic techniques used in performing
decision analyses and cost-effectiveness analyses.
TEXTBOOK AND OTHER RESOURCES:
Most of the
required readings are published
journal articles, which will be posted on CourseWorks. We will also assign chapters
from the textbook Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating
Evidence and Values by Myriam Hunink and colleagues as essential readings. The purchase of this book is optional but
strongly recommended for interested students, since most of
the topics covered in this course are expertly elaborated in this text.
Hunink MGM, Glasziou PP, Siegel JE, Weeks JC, Pliskin
JS, Elstein AS, Weinstein MC: Decision Making in
Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,
2001.
Alternative Texts:
Muennig, P. Cost-effectiveness
Analysis in Health: A Practical Approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007
Clemen RT. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction
to Decision Analysis, 2nd edition. Belmont, California: Duxbury
Press, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1995.
Haddix
AC, Teutsch SM, Corso PS.
Prevention Effectiveness: A Guide to Decision Analysis and Economic
Evaluation.
Other Useful References:
Gold MR, Siegel
JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC (eds.): Cost-Effectiveness in Health and
Medicine. Report of the Panel on
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Drummond
M, Stoddart G, Torrance G. Methods for the
Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programs, 2nd edition.
Oxford: Oxford University Press (1997).
Raiffa H. Decision Analysis: Introductory
Lectures on Choices Under Uncertainty, Reading, Massachusetts:
Addison-Wesley (1968).
CEA Registry:
Course Schedule
|
Session 1 – Introduction & Decision Trees |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Uses of decision
analysis in public health
and medicine: what, why, and who; Elements
of Decision Analysis; Constructing decision trees; Calculating expected values; Threshold analysis; Sensitivity analysis. Reading: Hunink, Glasziou, et al.: Decision
Making in Health and Medicine, Chapter 1 & 2. Pearson SD, Rawlings MD: Quality,
Innovation, and Value for Money: NICE and the British National Health Service.
JAMA 2005; 294 (20): 2618-2622. Assignment: Read Detsky et al. for tree-building tips: Detsky AS et al. Primer on Medical Decision Analysis:
Part 2 – Building a Tree. Medical Decision Making 1997; 17 (2): 126-135. Lab 1:
Introduction to TreeAge I Learn to
build a simple decision tree and perform sensitivity analyses using the TreeAge software. |
|
Session 2 – Evaluating Decisions to Test |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Decisions involving imperfect tests; Test
characteristics (Sensitivity/Specificity); Probability Revision; Bayes’s Formula Reading: Hunink, Glasziou, et al.: Decision
Making in Health and Medicine, Chapter 5: p128-149. Grimes DA, Schulz KF: Uses and abuses of screening tests. The Lancet 2002; 359 (9309): 881-884 Wald NJ, Hackshaw
AK, Frost CD. When can a risk factor be
used as a worthwhile screening test? BMJ 1999; 319: 1562-5 Lab 2:
Introduction to TreeAge II Incorporate imperfect tests into decision
tree in TreeAge |
|
Session 3 – Diagnostic Testing Strategies |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Tests with
multiple results; ROC curves, Choosing an optimal positivity criterion. Reading: Hunink, Glasziou, et al.: Decision
Making in Health and Medicine, Chapter 7. Obuchowski NA: Receiver
Operating Characteristic Curves and their use in radiology. Radiology
2003; 229(1): 3-8. Avins AL, Browner WS. Improving the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease to Aid in the
Management of High Cholesterol Levels: What a Difference a Decade Makes. JAMA
1998; 279: 445-449 Lab 3: Build
decision tree in Excel; ROC Curve An Excel tutorial on constructing ROC
curve and building decision trees in Excel when TreeAge
is not available. |
|
Session 4 – Recurring Events and Markov Models |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Life expectancy revisited; Recurring
events; Introduction to Markov models; Using Markov models to inform decision
analyses; Concepts of cohort simulation versus Muennig P, Franks P, Gold MR. The cost-effectiveness of health
insurance. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005; 28:59-64. Smith KJ,
Roberts MS. The cost-effectiveness of
Sildenafil. Ann Int Med 2000; 132: 933-937. Lab 4: Markov models I Simple Markov models in Excel :
Matrix Multiplication Markov modeling in TreeAge: life expectancy |
|
Session 5 – Preferences
in Medical Decision Making |
|
|
|
Learning
Objectives: Measuring and Valuing Outcomes in Individuals;
Eliciting Utilities; Standard Gamble; Time Trade-Off; Rating Scale; Other
Quality-of-Life Measures Reading: Hunink, Glasziou, et al.: Decision
Making in Health and Medicine, Chapter 4: Sections 4.1-4.3. Gold, Siegal, Russell and
Weinstein. Cost-effectiveness
in Health and Medicine. Chapter 4. Identifying and Valuing
Outcomes. Page 113-128. Lab 5: Markov
models II [Continue] Markov modeling in TreeAge
3-state Markov model, multiple outcomes, and
probabilistic sensitivity analysis |
|
Session 6 – Quality-adjusted
Life Years |
|
|
|
Learning
Objectives: Life expectancy;
Quality-adjusted life years
(QALYs); Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) Reading: Weinstein MC, Gold MR et al.: HALYS and QALYS and DALYS, OH MY: Similarities and Differences in
Summary Measures of Population Health. Annual Review of Public Health,
2002, 23: 115-134 Murray CJL,
Salomon JA, Mathers C. A Critical Examination of Summary Measures of Population Health. Bulletin
of the World Health Organization, 2000;78:981-992. Murray CJL
et al.: Eight Americas: investigating mortality disparities across races,
counties, and race-counties in the United States, PLoS
Med 2006: 3(9) e260 Lab 6: QALY
in Excel; Markov models III 1. Excel tutorial on QALY 2. Replicate in TreeAge Muennig et al. The cost-effectiveness of health insurance. American
Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005; 28:59-64. |
|
Session 7 – Biases and Framing Effects |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Biases in
probability judgment; Framing effects; Representativeness, availability,
anchoring and adjustments; Heuristics; Subjective probability Reading: Redelmeier DA et al.: Understanding patients’ decisions. JAMA 1993; 270: 72-76 McNeilm BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC,
Tversky A: On
the Elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 1259-1262 Tversky A, Kahneman
D: The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science 1981; 211:453-458 |
SPRING BREAK
(No Class on 3/15)
|
Session 8 – Cost-Effectiveness
Analysis & Resource Allocation |
|
|
3/22 |
Learning
Objectives: Methods in economic evaluation:
Shopping spree vs. competing choices problems; Resource allocation;
Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis; Dominance and extended dominance. Reading: Doubilet P, Weinstein MC, McNeil BJ: Use
and misuse of the term ‘cost‑effective’ in medicine. N Engl J Med 1986;
314:253‑256. Hunink, Glasziou, et al.: Decision Making in Health and Medicine,
Section 9.6. Muennig P, Franks P, Gold M. The cost-effectiveness of health
insurance. Am J Prev Med 2005; 28 (1): 59-64. Rinfret S, Cohen DJ, Lamas GA, Fleischmann KE, Weinstein
MC, Orav J, Schron E, Lee
KL, Goldman L: Cost-effectiveness of
dual-chamber pacing as compared with ventricular pacing for sinus-node
dysfunction. Circulation 2005;
111: 165-72 Paltiel AD, Weinstein
MC, Kimmel AD, Seage GR III, Losina E, Zhang H, Freedberg
KA, Walensky RP: Expanded HIV Screening in the United States – an Analysis of
cost-effectiveness. The Kim JJ, Wright TC, Goldie
SJ: Cost-effectiveness of alternative
triage strategies for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. JAMA 2002; 287:2382-2390. Fowler RA et al. Cost-effectiveness of defending against
bioterrorism: a comparison of vaccination and antibiotic prophylaxis against
anthrax. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 601-610. McMahon PM, Araki SS, Sandberg EA, Neumann PJ, Gazelle GS: Cost-effectiveness of PET in the diagnosis
of Alzheimer disease. Radiology
2003; 228:515-522. Rein DB et al. Cost-effectiveness of routine childhood vaccination for hepatitis A
in the Fiscella K, Franks P. Cost-Effectiveness
of the Transdermal Nicotine Patch as an Adjunct to Physicians’ Smoking
Cessation Counseling. JAMA 1996; 275:1247-1251. Lab 7: Excel
workshop: Competing choices, shopping spree |
|
|
|
|
Session 9 – CEA
workshop, Time Preferences and Discounting |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Rationale for discounting; Present value and future value;
Amortization; Keeler and Cretin’s paradox; Consequences of discounting;
choice of discount rates. Reading: Hunink, Glasziou, et al.: Decision
Making in Health and Medicine, Section 9.5. Weinstein et al. Recommendations of the Panel on
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996; 276: 1253-1258. Siegal JE et al.
Recommendations for Reporting Cost-Effectiveness Analyses. JAMA 1996; 276:
1339-1341. Lab 8: Cost-effectiveness
Analysis in TreeAge Advanced GCA case |
|
Session 10 – Public Health Application:
Cancer Screening Guest Speaker: Elena Elkin, PhD, Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: How
decision analysis can be used to assess the health benefits and costs of
cancer screening interventions; sources of data for models of cancer
screening; common biases in the estimation of screening efficacy; currently
recommended cancer screening strategies and their cost-effectiveness. Reading: Knudsen AB, McMahon MA,
Gazelle GS. Use of
Modeling to Evaluate the Cost-Effectiveness of Cancer Screening Programs. J Clin Oncology 25 (2) 2007, p203-208 |
|
Session 11 – Ethical and Policy Implications Guest
Lecturers |
|
|
|
Learning Objectives: Historical
resistance to CEA in the U.S.; Legal, political, and ethical concerns; The
future of CEA Reading: Neumann PJ. Using
cost-effectiveness analysis to improve health care. Chapter 3-5. |
|
Session 12
– Wrap-up and Exam Review |