BioMERGE graphic image
BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image
BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image
BioMERGE graphic image BioMERGE graphic image
 

BioMERGE Workshop I
"The interface between intrinsic and extrinsic drivers."

24-29 October 2002
University of Washington Seattle, Washington, USA

Download PDF of Conclusions Presentation

One of the primary goals of ASW1 was to develop a conceptual model to link changes in biodiversity to changes in ecosystem function. We determined that a two-level approach, based on the recognition of "response" and "effect" functional traits, was most appropriate. The "response traits" of the extant biota combined with the state changes caused by a driver enter into the response algortithm which determines the richness, composition, and distribution of abundances of the species in the new biota. The "effect traits" of the new biota, along with possible direct effects of the driver, determine the new level of ecosystem functioning.

MODEL ECOSYSTEM >>>

An additional goal of ASSW1 was to determine what a generic or model ecosystem might look like in order to facillitate our conceptual discussions.

 

  • Consumers link producers and decomposers

  • Functional groups are not necessarily nested within trophic levels nor or trophic groups cleanly definable as functional groups

  • Dashed arrows indicate minor flows while solid arrows indicate major flows. CI = inorganic carbon, CO = organic carbon, NI = inorganic nutrients, and NO = organic nutrients.

 

 

 

EXAMPLE DATASETS >>>

As an exercise, workshop participants developed two hypothetical datasets containing information on the abundance of species, their functional traits, and levels of ecosystem functioning prior to and after the imposition of a driver. The idea was to explore what was needed to constitute a "minimal" dataset, that is one for which observersknowing nothing about the nature of the driver were able to make informed guesses about the nature of the driver and why the ecosystem had responded in the observed manner. Below are the two example datasets that the participants developed.

ID#
Taxon
Nt1
Nt2
Trait 1
Trait 2
Trait 3
Trait 4
Trait 5
Trait 6
Trait 7
1
Aardvark**
23
25
4,5,6
2
Sunbird
42
20
7,8,9
3
Bombylid Flies
92
15
4,5,6
4
Ant 1*
0.5
0.1
+
7,8,9
-
5
Ant 2*
0.2
0.002
+
7,8,9
-
6
Ant 3*
0
1
-
10
+++
7
Dicot Shrub 1
80
50
med
med
1
Seed and root
8
Dicot Shrub 2
20
21
high
med
1.5
Seed and root
9
Dicot Shrub 3
10
1
med
low
1
Seed
10
Grass 1
5
5
high
med
0.1
Seed and veg.
11
Grass 2
10
20
high
high
0.25
Seed and veg.
12
Grass 3
0
90
high
high
0.2
Seed and veg.

Traits: 1) fire tolerance, 2) fire promotion, 3) root depth (m), 4) regeneration strategy 5) seed dispersal +/-,
6) consumes species #, 7) aggressiveness

** number per km2, * colony number per m2, rest are number per hectare
Environment: no change in annual rainfall, average temperature, atmospheric composition


Species
Trophic Group
Family
Body Mass (kg)
Height (cm)
C:N
Year 1
Year 10
T1 % Cover
T2 % Cover
T1 Abun
T2 Abun
A. nasty
Predator
Felidae
100
0.1
0.001
B. maximus
Herbivore
Boivid
500
2
0
B. minimus
Herbivore
Cervid
60
12
2
C. minimini
Herbivore
Cervid
40
10
1
D. minitini
Herbivore
Lagomorph
5
30
3
P. maximus
Poaceae
160
High
10
90
P. minimus
Poaceae
30
Low
20
5
Q. minimini
Poaceae
40
Low
50
3
R. minitini
Poaceae
35
Low
20
2
AG Biomass(g/m2)
350
700
Decomposition
Fast
Slow
Litter
Thin
Thick

This area receives 1000 mm rain per year. Animal abundances are in individuals/hectare

PARTICIPANTS IN ASW1 >>>

David Ackerly, Stanford University
Ansgar Kahmen, Max Planck Inst of Biogeochemistry
Mike Austin, CSIRO Sharon Lawler, UC Davis
Andy Beattie, Macquarie University
Michel Loreau, Ecole Normale Superior
Jason Bradford, UC Davis
Nicholas Mouquet, FSU
Laura Cacho, U Virginia
Peter Morin, Rutgers University
Robert Colwell, U Connecticut
Shahid Naeem, U Washington
Amy Downing, Ohio Wesleyan
Duane Peltzer, Landcare Research
Jeff Dukes, Carnegie Institute of Washington
Andrea Pfisterer, U Zurich
Katia Engelhardt, University of Maryland
Jennifer Ruesink, U Washington
Andy Hector, NERC, Imperial College Mahesh Sankaran, Colorado State
Melinda Hillery, Edith Cowan Univsersity
Brian Starzomski, U British Columbia
Pablo Inchausti, Ecole Normale Superior
Amy Symstad, Illinois Natural History Survey
Claire Jouseau, U Washington
Volkmar Wolters, Justus Leibig U
Justin Wright, U Washington

 

 
BioMERGE graphic image
About Page Press & Public Workshops Page Resources Page Current News