Printable Version of Module 5: Endings
written by Marlon Feld




To print from Netscape just click "Print Module 5." To print from Internet Explorer just go to the File menu, then choose "Print." When you are finished printing, click "Close This Window" to return to Module 5.

Musical Works

 

  1. Joseph Haydn, String Quartet in Bb "Joke", last movement (1781)
    Kod‡ly Quartet, Naxos DDD 8.550788

  2. Ludwig van Beethoven, Symphony #5, first movement (1808)
    Beethoven: Symphonien Nr. 5, Wiener Philharmoniker, Carlos Kleiber, Deutsche Grammophon CD 447 400-2


  3. Fryderyk Chopin, Prelude in E Minor (1839)
    EMI CDH 7 61050 2; Performed by Alfred Cortot


  4. Robert Schumann, Dichterliebe, "In wunderschonen Monat Mai" (1840)
    Thomas Allen/Roger Vignoles, VC 7 90787-2, Track 1


  5. Igor Stravinsky, Three Pieces for String Quartet, #1 (1914)
    Haubenstock-Ramati - von Einem, EMI Classics CDC 7 54347 2


  6. The Beatles, "Cry Baby Cry" (1968)

Questions on musical works


For each of the musical works:

Does the work end, or does it just stop? If it ends, is there a separate section that you would call "the ending"? If so,

  • what similarities are there between the ending and earlier parts of the work? Conversely, do new things happen in the ending that didn't happen before?
  • is the ending smoothly connected to the work, or is there a disjunction? Consider this question both in terms of raw sound, and in terms of musical psychology.

Is there anything ambiguous, uncertain, or incomplete about how the work ends or stops? Are you left feeling that it should have gone on longer, or maybe not as long?

If the work just stops, does it stop in the middle of trying to get somewhere, or was it not going anywhere? Could it have stopped earlier or later?

Does the way the work stops or ends lead you to reevaluate the rest of the work? Or does it confirm opinions you already have?

Readings


1. A description of rondo form, by the author of this module.

Although pieces called "rondos" arose in the Classical period (the late 18th century), the basic idea behind the rondo has existed for almost the entire history of music: something that stays the same alternates with things that change. In form notation, a rondo looks like this: ABACA..., where A is the recurring passage of music, and B and C are the contrasting sections. The number of contrasting sections varies; two is a minimum, and more than four would be unusual.

The A section of the rondo typically has its own formal structure. In the works of Classical composers, this form is often aababa, where a might be called the rondo's theme, and b, while different, shares some of a's rhythmic and melodic patterns. When the A section returns after contrasting section, it may be abbreviated to aba.

The contrasting sections (B, C, and possibly D and E) often do not split into subsections as cleanly as does the A section. They rush forward in a flowing stream, sometimes with rather fiery material. In many cases, the A section sounds relatively stable and balanced in comparison to the contrasting sections.

In the Classical period, rondos in multi-movement works were almost always final movements. Because a typical rondo did not transpose, rearrange, or otherwise "develop" its main theme (as found in the A section), the rondo was considered a relatively "light" form, not too serious. Rondo themes tended to be bouncy rather than stately. Haydn, a composer renowned for his wit, would sometimes end a contrasting section with a dramatic gesture, suggesting that some sort of grand entrance would follow; what followed was the familiar A section, the very opposite of grand.

 

2. A description of the coda in sonata form, by the author of this module.

"Coda" refers to a section of an instrumental movement that serves as an ending. (The term originally derives from the Latin for "tail.") Not every section ending an instrumental work counts as a coda: the coda must appear after the main business of the movement is over, as a sort of clincher. What constitutes a coda will thus depend on what the movement's "main business" is believed to be.

In the case of Classical-period works written according to formula, the coda constitutes the music that is heard after the needs of the formula have been fulfilled. The first movement of Beethoven's Symphony #5 follows a formula later dubbed sonata form. A movement in sonata form consists of three large sections: the exposition, in which musical material is introduced (this section is often played twice); the development, in which the material is twisted, fragmented, and recombined; and the recapitulation, in which the material from the exposition reappears in roughly its original form (but with some harmonic changes). The recapitulation is held to end when it has covered all the material of the exposition; anything after that is coda. On the recording presented here, the recapitulation ends and the coda begins at 5:52.

While some codas are comprised of simple, repetitive ending gestures, others are more complex, reusing musical material from earlier in the movement and/or presenting new material that sounds important. Some music theorists, influenced by Beethoven in particular, came to call the coda of a sonata form the "second development," suggesting that the coda's role in presenting and recombining the movement's melodies and rhythms could earn it a place in the movement's main business. Is the coda then still a coda? It is if the movement is still interpreted according to the sonata-form formula, in which anything after the recapitulation is extra.

 

3. From the book Beethoven Hero by Scott Burnham.

The coda of [the first movement of Beethoven's Symphony #5] is the epitome of the struggling Beethoven, for rarely does his music appear to work so hard in order to get nowhere fast. Every step is now laborious, an effect ensured by the figuration added to what are essentially descending and ascending C-minor scales....An element of melodic construction that is often used as a means for a quick and effortless sprint from octave to octave, the scale here becomes an imposing staircase upon which some ponderous weight is hauled up and down, step by step....

The excessive effort of this coda, expressed both in the violent outbursts at its beginning and end and in the belabored figurations mentioned earlier, can be heard as something like the forced assertions of bad faith. Consider the very last bars of the movement: the first theme is referred to almost nostalgically and then blasted away with far more firepower than is needed, resulting in an almost churlish display of power. This juxtaposition emphasizes the containment mechanism of closure, made to sound, at least in the immediate context, like overkill. The effect is actually one of irony, for the emphatic final bars do provide the commensurate degree of closure for the opening phrase of the movement (and the entire ensuing process); only by immediately appending these bars to a now wistful version of that opening does their requisite closure become overwrought and forced.

 

4. Teaching material written by the author for Schumann's "Im wunderschonen Monat Mai."

Dichterliebe ("The Poet's Love") is a song cycle written on poems by the German Romantic poet Heinrich Heine. A song cycle is a sequence of songs meant to be performed as a single, large work. Through the 16 songs that comprise Dichterliebe, the singer/poet descends from hopeful love to bitter irony, disillusionment, and despair. "Im wunderschonen Monat Mai" ("In the wonderfully lovely month of May") is the first song, in which the singer still hopes that the woman he loves can be his:

Im wunderschonen Monat Mai,
Als alle Knospen sprangen,
Da ist in meinem Herzen
Die Liebe aufgegangen.

In the wonderfully lovely month of May,
When all the buds were bursting,
Then it was that in my heart
Love broke through.

Im wunderschonen Monat Mai,
Als alle Vogel sangen,
Da hab'ich ihr gestanden
Main Sehnen und Verlangen.

In the wonderfully lovely month of May,
When all the birds were singing,
Then it was that I confessed to her
My longing and desire.


This song is strophic, meaning that the same music is used for each of the two verses. (Songs in which different verses have different music are called through-composed.) The two verses are very similar in their layout: each verse features two lines that describe a happy spring scene, and two more lines in which the singer/poet describes his own love. The second verse is somewhat more active, in that the singer not only feels his love, but "confesses" it to the woman he loves.

A piano introduction precedes the singing of the first verse; this piano music returns between the verses, and returns again to end the song. The form of the song can thus be described as ABABA, where A represents the solo piano music and B represents a sung verse. (Granting the piano music a full capital letter reflects the point of view that it is somehow important; my use of the term "introduction" might be read as implying the opposite.)

The piano introduction puts us in a minor key, but never arrives on the tonic chord, the "home base," of this key. You may be able to feel an unresolved, floating, almost uncomfortable quality to this introduction; this is a result of the avoidance of the tonic. Notice that the piano introduction has both a melody and an accompaniment; the melody, in a high register, sounds like something that could be sung.

When the voice comes in, it changes this melody to a different key, one in major instead of minor. This change becomes apparent when the voice ends the first line on the tonic chord of the major key. The major mode suggests the happiness and optimism in the setting: "In the wonderfully lovely month of May..." The second line has the same music, as the description of the landscape continues.

The singer begins to reach higher during the third line. This reaching upward in pitch accords with the singer's change from describing a peaceful, static landscape to his describing the tumultuous longing in his heart. The singer reaches his highest note near the end of the fourth line, the line that directly refers to love. (The singer "breaks through" to a high note just as love "breaks through" in his heart!)

Instead of coming down from his high notes and relaxing, the singer drops out; the solo piano music takes over, carrying on the melody that the singer left off. Because the piano's music is harmonically unresolved and in minor, the mood darkens. Does the piano "know" that the singer's love will be unrequited?

If so, the piano doesn't tell the singer, for the second verse follows the same musical and emotional process as the first verse. The final solo piano passage ends the song on a non-tonic chord. The end of a work of music is the most typical place for the "home base" of the tonic chord to appear; in this regard, "In wunderschonen Monat Mai" is quite unusual.

 

Questions on readings


Reading 2:
The author on sonata-form codas

The author mentions that theorists concocted the idea of the coda as "second development" under Beethoven's influence. Given the author's description of the "official" development, does the coda of the first movement of Beethoven's Symphony #5 qualify as a "second development"? Or is it "comprised of simple, repetitive ending gestures"? Or does it fit both these descriptions, or neither?

Reading 3: Scott Burnham

Do you agree with Burnham's characterization of the ending of the first movement of Beethoven's Symphony #5?

Reading 4: The author on Schumann

In describing "In wunderschonen Monat Mai," the author combines technical fact and subjective characterization. Does the characterization seem accurate to you? Can the facts that the author cites be used to defend a different interpretation of the song?