Previous | Next
565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485868788 of 512
Do they send the story out, in the tradition of the Times, in sort of story capsule
beforehand so that you have a rough idea of what the column will be on?
If they do, believe it or not, I don't even see it. I don't know. I really don't want to
know. As a matter of fact, I make a policy of not reading their copy until after it has
appeared in the paper. I always read it but I never read it prior to its appearance in the
paper, because I don't want to be influenced or affected in any way by it. And I don't have
any editorial responsibility for it, and therefore I don't edit it.
Now, this is only true in our page of these three columns: Krock, Reston, and Sulzberger.
It's not true of [Russell] Baker, who came into the page under different circumstances.
This question that you asked is an important question as far as newspapers generally and
the relationship between columnists and editorial page, and my answer in brief, what I was
really trying to get at, I guess in a rather verbose way, was that I think if you have good,
live editorials, you don't have to worry about the competition of a good, lively column. I
think, if I may say so without sounding boastful, I think we have both on our editorial page.
On the days Baker doesn't sign, does one of your editorial writers write the column?
The only unsigned column we have is called “Topics of the Times,” which we now
run only once a week. It used to run much more frequently, but with the advent of Baker
and my desire to squeeze a little more space for letters on the page, I had to reduce “Topics”
to only one day a week. That is a contributed column, written occasionally by one of the
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help