Previous | Next
120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151 of 512
do. Mr. Sulzberger and Mr. Merz did. And as a matter of fact, I do with them or I wouldn't
be where I am together either, because we all do have basically the same long-term views.
To express it in the loosest possible terms, we have a basically liberal, internationalist kind
of outlook that I think comes through in our daily reactions to what is happening. But this
is a different thing from saying that we're planning an editorial to be run six months from
now. That you can't do. At least I don't think you can do it on a daily newspaper. About
the furthest insofar as actual editorial project goes, specific editorial projection goes, would
be a matter of a few weeks.
In the Vietnam thing, for instance, I've been fussing around and there has been planning
over a matter of weeks and it will be a couple of more weeks before it's actually run. But
that's still relatively short term.
Okay, now you wanted to discuss an incident with President Kennedy.
Well, this is just a little vignette that might be amusing and throw some light on
Kennedy himself. It must have been about 1955 or '6-no later than that-when Mr.
Kennedy was senator, and I as a member of the editorial board at the time used to go to
Washington fairly frequently and drop in on various political figures that I thought were of
interest and talk with them, get background information. I did this habitually a few times
a year. I almost always, from the time Kennedy became senator, would stop in to see him
because I very, very early in his senatorial career began to form a very high opinion of him
and of his future possibilities. I have to say in parentheses here that I think I'm the first
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help