152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187 of 512
Let's start with a retrospect on what you were talking about last time, which is a mere
thirteen years ago.
That's right. And I was interested that, in what I said last in '64 in that session,
that I recalled very well the difficulties that I had with Punch [Arthur Ochs Sulzberger] in
the spring of '64 over the supersonic transport problem. What it really involved was
whether or not the Times should support the development, which involved federal funds,
the development of the supersonic, and Punch was very strongly for it. I was extremely
dubious about the wisdom of it, on environmental as well as general public policy grounds.
While I remember that we had difficulty over this, and I guess it was the first real problem
that we had, as between myself as editor and Punch as publisher, I did not recall, until I re-
read the transcript of the 1964 oral history that I'd given thirteen years ago, the apparent
severity of it. I really hadn't recalled that. And I notice that I felt that I was going through
a real crisis, even considering the possibility of resignation at that point. But then we
satisfactorily worked out a compromise on the issue, in which I was quite satisfied about.
So this was kind of a test, I guess.
In retrospect of the time, in retrospect, say, of 1965, you didn't think anything of it,
because you had come to a satisfactory resolution.
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help