Previous | Next
152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187 of 512
On this issue, yes.
It almost ruined their friendship.
I think - I never had very close personal relations with any of these executives on
the Times, news people, in any case, but I am quite sure that this difference helped to chill
whatever relationship I would have had. I do feel that, in all candor. I felt that. Maybe I
imagined this, and maybe I was a little supersensitive about it, but I have to say that I
think the answer to that question is: yes, I think it did. Although I certainly don't have any
dramatic evidences of that in my mind, except occasionally at these luncheons there would
be sharp - but it was perfectly obvious that I didn't have very close personal connections
with any of the people in the news department, and I feel that this rather -
Just as well.
Yes. Well, I think that this rather helped to chill that.
Turner Catledge, who I guess of all the people in the news department I was friendliest
with - we always had very friendly relationships, and, as a matter of fact, I think that
Turner was probably, maybe by coincidence, more sympathetic than anybody else over
among the top executives to the position that we were taking on Vietnam.
You mentioned Halberstam. That raises a question that I think may be worth just
digressing or going into for a minute, because this comes to another matter that, to me, was
© 2006 Columbia University
Libraries | Oral History
Research Office | Rights and
Permissions | Help