Previous | Next
Part: 1234 Session: 1234 Page 152153154155156157158159160161162163164165166167168169170171172173174175176177178179180181182183184185186187 of 512
the days when I used to complain, particularly to Turner, this was the answer that I got quite often.
Well, I got two kinds of answers. One answer would be: “Yes, I agree with you, that was terrible and it shouldn't have happened.” That was, I think, the more frequent answer. But occasionally I would get - particularly from Turner's successors, I would get the answer that, “Well, I just don't feel that this was editorialization.”
And I gradually tapered off in arguing about it.
Scotty Reston was not strong on this?
I don't remember any particular discussion with him about that, but on the question of columns and columnists under their own name, that's a totally different matter.
I think that's clear. Scotty's successor was?
That was Abe Rosenthal, wasn't it? Yes. Yes, Rosenthal, I think, succeeded Scotty as the top news executive of the Times, yes. I do think that there is a different perception, on his part and on my part, of what is and what is not editorialization in the news.
Part of the problem is, I suppose, that interpretive journalism has become so much more important than it was.
© 2006 Columbia University Libraries | Oral History Research Office | Rights and Permissions | Help